Determining optimal pinger spacing for harbour porpoise bycatch mitigation

A trial was conducted in the Danish North Sea hake gillnet fishery in July to September 2006 to determine whether the spacing of the Aquatec AQUAmark100 pinger could be increased without reducing the effectiveness of the pinger in mitigating harbour porpoise bycatch. The trial was designed as a cont...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Endangered Species Research
Main Authors: F Larsen, C Krog, O Ritzau Eigaard
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Inter-Research 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00494
https://doaj.org/article/692eef11c9814825b0c940cb57ca7cab
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:692eef11c9814825b0c940cb57ca7cab
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:692eef11c9814825b0c940cb57ca7cab 2023-05-15T16:33:19+02:00 Determining optimal pinger spacing for harbour porpoise bycatch mitigation F Larsen C Krog O Ritzau Eigaard 2013-04-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00494 https://doaj.org/article/692eef11c9814825b0c940cb57ca7cab EN eng Inter-Research https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esr/v20/n2/p147-152/ https://doaj.org/toc/1863-5407 https://doaj.org/toc/1613-4796 1863-5407 1613-4796 doi:10.3354/esr00494 https://doaj.org/article/692eef11c9814825b0c940cb57ca7cab Endangered Species Research, Vol 20, Iss 2, Pp 147-152 (2013) Zoology QL1-991 Botany QK1-989 article 2013 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00494 2022-12-31T14:50:19Z A trial was conducted in the Danish North Sea hake gillnet fishery in July to September 2006 to determine whether the spacing of the Aquatec AQUAmark100 pinger could be increased without reducing the effectiveness of the pinger in mitigating harbour porpoise bycatch. The trial was designed as a controlled experiment where nets without pingers formed the control group (41 hauls) and nets with pingers spaced at 455 m (24 hauls) and 585 m (43 hauls), respectively, formed the 2 experimental groups. Nets without pingers had a bycatch frequency of 0.54 incidents per haul, nets with pingers spaced at 585 m had a bycatch frequency of 0.12 incidents per haul, and nets with pingers spaced at 455 m had a bycatch frequency of 0. The bycatch frequencies for the 2 experimental groups were both significantly different from the bycatch frequencies of the control group (p < 0.0001). These results show that the spacing of the Aquatec AQUAmark100 pinger can be increased without reducing the effectiveness of the pinger in mitigating harbour porpoise bycatch, thereby reducing some of the disadvantages of widespread pinger deployment. The results also stress the importance of basing implementation regulation on solid evidence and led the Danish Fisheries Directorate in 2007 to allow the use of the AQUAmark100 pinger with a spacing of up to 455 m under derogation to the European Union’s Council Regulation No. 812/2004. Article in Journal/Newspaper Harbour porpoise Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Hake ENVELOPE(15.612,15.612,66.797,66.797) Endangered Species Research 20 2 147 152
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Zoology
QL1-991
Botany
QK1-989
spellingShingle Zoology
QL1-991
Botany
QK1-989
F Larsen
C Krog
O Ritzau Eigaard
Determining optimal pinger spacing for harbour porpoise bycatch mitigation
topic_facet Zoology
QL1-991
Botany
QK1-989
description A trial was conducted in the Danish North Sea hake gillnet fishery in July to September 2006 to determine whether the spacing of the Aquatec AQUAmark100 pinger could be increased without reducing the effectiveness of the pinger in mitigating harbour porpoise bycatch. The trial was designed as a controlled experiment where nets without pingers formed the control group (41 hauls) and nets with pingers spaced at 455 m (24 hauls) and 585 m (43 hauls), respectively, formed the 2 experimental groups. Nets without pingers had a bycatch frequency of 0.54 incidents per haul, nets with pingers spaced at 585 m had a bycatch frequency of 0.12 incidents per haul, and nets with pingers spaced at 455 m had a bycatch frequency of 0. The bycatch frequencies for the 2 experimental groups were both significantly different from the bycatch frequencies of the control group (p < 0.0001). These results show that the spacing of the Aquatec AQUAmark100 pinger can be increased without reducing the effectiveness of the pinger in mitigating harbour porpoise bycatch, thereby reducing some of the disadvantages of widespread pinger deployment. The results also stress the importance of basing implementation regulation on solid evidence and led the Danish Fisheries Directorate in 2007 to allow the use of the AQUAmark100 pinger with a spacing of up to 455 m under derogation to the European Union’s Council Regulation No. 812/2004.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author F Larsen
C Krog
O Ritzau Eigaard
author_facet F Larsen
C Krog
O Ritzau Eigaard
author_sort F Larsen
title Determining optimal pinger spacing for harbour porpoise bycatch mitigation
title_short Determining optimal pinger spacing for harbour porpoise bycatch mitigation
title_full Determining optimal pinger spacing for harbour porpoise bycatch mitigation
title_fullStr Determining optimal pinger spacing for harbour porpoise bycatch mitigation
title_full_unstemmed Determining optimal pinger spacing for harbour porpoise bycatch mitigation
title_sort determining optimal pinger spacing for harbour porpoise bycatch mitigation
publisher Inter-Research
publishDate 2013
url https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00494
https://doaj.org/article/692eef11c9814825b0c940cb57ca7cab
long_lat ENVELOPE(15.612,15.612,66.797,66.797)
geographic Hake
geographic_facet Hake
genre Harbour porpoise
genre_facet Harbour porpoise
op_source Endangered Species Research, Vol 20, Iss 2, Pp 147-152 (2013)
op_relation https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esr/v20/n2/p147-152/
https://doaj.org/toc/1863-5407
https://doaj.org/toc/1613-4796
1863-5407
1613-4796
doi:10.3354/esr00494
https://doaj.org/article/692eef11c9814825b0c940cb57ca7cab
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00494
container_title Endangered Species Research
container_volume 20
container_issue 2
container_start_page 147
op_container_end_page 152
_version_ 1766023016211283968