Landscape‐level wolf space use is correlated with prey abundance, ease of mobility, and the distribution of prey habitat
Abstract Predator space use influences ecosystem dynamics, and a fundamental goal assumed for a foraging predator is to maximize encounter rate with prey. This can be achieved by disproportionately utilizing areas of high prey density or, where prey are mobile and therefore spatially unpredictable,...
Published in: | Ecosphere |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1783 https://doaj.org/article/666dd79e23444e16b661b828a36799fb |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:666dd79e23444e16b661b828a36799fb |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:666dd79e23444e16b661b828a36799fb 2023-05-15T13:13:36+02:00 Landscape‐level wolf space use is correlated with prey abundance, ease of mobility, and the distribution of prey habitat Andrew M. Kittle Morgan Anderson Tal Avgar James A. Baker Glen S. Brown Jevon Hagens Ed Iwachewski Scott Moffatt Anna Mosser Brent R. Patterson Douglas E. B. Reid Arthur R. Rodgers Jen Shuter Garrett M. Street Ian D. Thompson Lucas M. Vander Vennen John M. Fryxell 2017-04-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1783 https://doaj.org/article/666dd79e23444e16b661b828a36799fb EN eng Wiley https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1783 https://doaj.org/toc/2150-8925 2150-8925 doi:10.1002/ecs2.1783 https://doaj.org/article/666dd79e23444e16b661b828a36799fb Ecosphere, Vol 8, Iss 4, Pp n/a-n/a (2017) Alces alces Canis lupus functional response predator–prey game Rangifer tarandus caribou Ecology QH540-549.5 article 2017 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1783 2022-12-30T23:03:48Z Abstract Predator space use influences ecosystem dynamics, and a fundamental goal assumed for a foraging predator is to maximize encounter rate with prey. This can be achieved by disproportionately utilizing areas of high prey density or, where prey are mobile and therefore spatially unpredictable, utilizing patches of their prey's preferred resources. A third, potentially complementary strategy is to increase mobility by using linear features like roads and/or frozen waterways. Here, we used novel population‐level predator utilization distributions (termed “localized density distributions”) in a single‐predator (wolf), two‐prey (moose and caribou) system to evaluate these space‐use hypotheses. The study was conducted in contrasting sections of a large boreal forest area in northern Ontario, Canada, with a spatial gradient of human disturbances and predator and prey densities. Our results indicated that wolves consistently used forest stands preferred by moose, their main prey species in this part of Ontario. Direct use of prey‐rich areas was also significant but restricted to where there was a high local density of moose, whereas use of linear features was pronounced where local moose density was lower. These behaviors suggest that wolf foraging decisions, while consistently influenced by spatially anchored patches of prey forage resources, were also determined by local ecological conditions, specifically prey density. Wolves appeared to utilize prey‐rich areas when regional preferred prey density exceeded a threshold that made this profitable, whereas they disproportionately used linear features that promoted mobility when low prey density made directly tracking prey distribution unprofitable. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Canis lupus Rangifer tarandus Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Canada Ecosphere 8 4 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
Alces alces Canis lupus functional response predator–prey game Rangifer tarandus caribou Ecology QH540-549.5 |
spellingShingle |
Alces alces Canis lupus functional response predator–prey game Rangifer tarandus caribou Ecology QH540-549.5 Andrew M. Kittle Morgan Anderson Tal Avgar James A. Baker Glen S. Brown Jevon Hagens Ed Iwachewski Scott Moffatt Anna Mosser Brent R. Patterson Douglas E. B. Reid Arthur R. Rodgers Jen Shuter Garrett M. Street Ian D. Thompson Lucas M. Vander Vennen John M. Fryxell Landscape‐level wolf space use is correlated with prey abundance, ease of mobility, and the distribution of prey habitat |
topic_facet |
Alces alces Canis lupus functional response predator–prey game Rangifer tarandus caribou Ecology QH540-549.5 |
description |
Abstract Predator space use influences ecosystem dynamics, and a fundamental goal assumed for a foraging predator is to maximize encounter rate with prey. This can be achieved by disproportionately utilizing areas of high prey density or, where prey are mobile and therefore spatially unpredictable, utilizing patches of their prey's preferred resources. A third, potentially complementary strategy is to increase mobility by using linear features like roads and/or frozen waterways. Here, we used novel population‐level predator utilization distributions (termed “localized density distributions”) in a single‐predator (wolf), two‐prey (moose and caribou) system to evaluate these space‐use hypotheses. The study was conducted in contrasting sections of a large boreal forest area in northern Ontario, Canada, with a spatial gradient of human disturbances and predator and prey densities. Our results indicated that wolves consistently used forest stands preferred by moose, their main prey species in this part of Ontario. Direct use of prey‐rich areas was also significant but restricted to where there was a high local density of moose, whereas use of linear features was pronounced where local moose density was lower. These behaviors suggest that wolf foraging decisions, while consistently influenced by spatially anchored patches of prey forage resources, were also determined by local ecological conditions, specifically prey density. Wolves appeared to utilize prey‐rich areas when regional preferred prey density exceeded a threshold that made this profitable, whereas they disproportionately used linear features that promoted mobility when low prey density made directly tracking prey distribution unprofitable. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Andrew M. Kittle Morgan Anderson Tal Avgar James A. Baker Glen S. Brown Jevon Hagens Ed Iwachewski Scott Moffatt Anna Mosser Brent R. Patterson Douglas E. B. Reid Arthur R. Rodgers Jen Shuter Garrett M. Street Ian D. Thompson Lucas M. Vander Vennen John M. Fryxell |
author_facet |
Andrew M. Kittle Morgan Anderson Tal Avgar James A. Baker Glen S. Brown Jevon Hagens Ed Iwachewski Scott Moffatt Anna Mosser Brent R. Patterson Douglas E. B. Reid Arthur R. Rodgers Jen Shuter Garrett M. Street Ian D. Thompson Lucas M. Vander Vennen John M. Fryxell |
author_sort |
Andrew M. Kittle |
title |
Landscape‐level wolf space use is correlated with prey abundance, ease of mobility, and the distribution of prey habitat |
title_short |
Landscape‐level wolf space use is correlated with prey abundance, ease of mobility, and the distribution of prey habitat |
title_full |
Landscape‐level wolf space use is correlated with prey abundance, ease of mobility, and the distribution of prey habitat |
title_fullStr |
Landscape‐level wolf space use is correlated with prey abundance, ease of mobility, and the distribution of prey habitat |
title_full_unstemmed |
Landscape‐level wolf space use is correlated with prey abundance, ease of mobility, and the distribution of prey habitat |
title_sort |
landscape‐level wolf space use is correlated with prey abundance, ease of mobility, and the distribution of prey habitat |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1783 https://doaj.org/article/666dd79e23444e16b661b828a36799fb |
geographic |
Canada |
geographic_facet |
Canada |
genre |
Alces alces Canis lupus Rangifer tarandus |
genre_facet |
Alces alces Canis lupus Rangifer tarandus |
op_source |
Ecosphere, Vol 8, Iss 4, Pp n/a-n/a (2017) |
op_relation |
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1783 https://doaj.org/toc/2150-8925 2150-8925 doi:10.1002/ecs2.1783 https://doaj.org/article/666dd79e23444e16b661b828a36799fb |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1783 |
container_title |
Ecosphere |
container_volume |
8 |
container_issue |
4 |
_version_ |
1766259355976466432 |