Assessing bias corrections of oceanic surface conditions for atmospheric models

Future sea surface temperature and sea-ice concentration from coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation models such as those from the CMIP5 experiment are often used as boundary forcings for the downscaling of future climate experiments. Yet, these models show some considerable biases when compar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geoscientific Model Development
Main Authors: J. Beaumet, G. Krinner, M. Déqué, R. Haarsma, L. Li
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-321-2019
https://doaj.org/article/661cc2ca1abe4a5c8eb6d3d1427ab9d4
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:661cc2ca1abe4a5c8eb6d3d1427ab9d4
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:661cc2ca1abe4a5c8eb6d3d1427ab9d4 2023-05-15T18:17:12+02:00 Assessing bias corrections of oceanic surface conditions for atmospheric models J. Beaumet G. Krinner M. Déqué R. Haarsma L. Li 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-321-2019 https://doaj.org/article/661cc2ca1abe4a5c8eb6d3d1427ab9d4 EN eng Copernicus Publications https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/321/2019/gmd-12-321-2019.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1991-959X https://doaj.org/toc/1991-9603 doi:10.5194/gmd-12-321-2019 1991-959X 1991-9603 https://doaj.org/article/661cc2ca1abe4a5c8eb6d3d1427ab9d4 Geoscientific Model Development, Vol 12, Pp 321-342 (2019) Geology QE1-996.5 article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-321-2019 2022-12-31T01:37:29Z Future sea surface temperature and sea-ice concentration from coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation models such as those from the CMIP5 experiment are often used as boundary forcings for the downscaling of future climate experiments. Yet, these models show some considerable biases when compared to the observations over present climate. In this paper, existing methods such as an absolute anomaly method and a quantile–quantile method for sea surface temperature (SST) as well as a look-up table and a relative anomaly method for sea-ice concentration (SIC) are presented. For SIC, we also propose a new analogue method. Each method is objectively evaluated with a perfect model test using CMIP5 model experiments and some real-case applications using observations. We find that with respect to other previously existing methods, the analogue method is a substantial improvement for the bias correction of future SIC. Consistency between the constructed SST and SIC fields is an important constraint to consider, as is consistency between the prescribed sea-ice concentration and thickness; we show that the latter can be ensured by using a simple parameterisation of sea-ice thickness as a function of instantaneous and annual minimum SIC. Article in Journal/Newspaper Sea ice Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Geoscientific Model Development 12 1 321 342
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle Geology
QE1-996.5
J. Beaumet
G. Krinner
M. Déqué
R. Haarsma
L. Li
Assessing bias corrections of oceanic surface conditions for atmospheric models
topic_facet Geology
QE1-996.5
description Future sea surface temperature and sea-ice concentration from coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation models such as those from the CMIP5 experiment are often used as boundary forcings for the downscaling of future climate experiments. Yet, these models show some considerable biases when compared to the observations over present climate. In this paper, existing methods such as an absolute anomaly method and a quantile–quantile method for sea surface temperature (SST) as well as a look-up table and a relative anomaly method for sea-ice concentration (SIC) are presented. For SIC, we also propose a new analogue method. Each method is objectively evaluated with a perfect model test using CMIP5 model experiments and some real-case applications using observations. We find that with respect to other previously existing methods, the analogue method is a substantial improvement for the bias correction of future SIC. Consistency between the constructed SST and SIC fields is an important constraint to consider, as is consistency between the prescribed sea-ice concentration and thickness; we show that the latter can be ensured by using a simple parameterisation of sea-ice thickness as a function of instantaneous and annual minimum SIC.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author J. Beaumet
G. Krinner
M. Déqué
R. Haarsma
L. Li
author_facet J. Beaumet
G. Krinner
M. Déqué
R. Haarsma
L. Li
author_sort J. Beaumet
title Assessing bias corrections of oceanic surface conditions for atmospheric models
title_short Assessing bias corrections of oceanic surface conditions for atmospheric models
title_full Assessing bias corrections of oceanic surface conditions for atmospheric models
title_fullStr Assessing bias corrections of oceanic surface conditions for atmospheric models
title_full_unstemmed Assessing bias corrections of oceanic surface conditions for atmospheric models
title_sort assessing bias corrections of oceanic surface conditions for atmospheric models
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-321-2019
https://doaj.org/article/661cc2ca1abe4a5c8eb6d3d1427ab9d4
genre Sea ice
genre_facet Sea ice
op_source Geoscientific Model Development, Vol 12, Pp 321-342 (2019)
op_relation https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/321/2019/gmd-12-321-2019.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1991-959X
https://doaj.org/toc/1991-9603
doi:10.5194/gmd-12-321-2019
1991-959X
1991-9603
https://doaj.org/article/661cc2ca1abe4a5c8eb6d3d1427ab9d4
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-321-2019
container_title Geoscientific Model Development
container_volume 12
container_issue 1
container_start_page 321
op_container_end_page 342
_version_ 1766191279641722880