Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies.

This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and mi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLOS Biology
Main Author: Philip L Munday
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022
Subjects:
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ocean acidification
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809
https://doaj.org/article/65ceffb2dd7f437e8d7537bfaa1a76a8
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:65ceffb2dd7f437e8d7537bfaa1a76a8
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:65ceffb2dd7f437e8d7537bfaa1a76a8 2023-05-15T17:50:08+02:00 Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies. Philip L Munday 2022-11-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809 https://doaj.org/article/65ceffb2dd7f437e8d7537bfaa1a76a8 EN eng Public Library of Science (PLoS) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809 https://doaj.org/toc/1544-9173 https://doaj.org/toc/1545-7885 1544-9173 1545-7885 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809 https://doaj.org/article/65ceffb2dd7f437e8d7537bfaa1a76a8 PLoS Biology, Vol 20, Iss 11, p e3001809 (2022) Biology (General) QH301-705.5 article 2022 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809 2022-12-30T19:28:53Z This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and missing studies with strong effects. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ocean acidification Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles PLOS Biology 20 11 e3001809
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Philip L Munday
Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies.
topic_facet Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
description This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and missing studies with strong effects.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Philip L Munday
author_facet Philip L Munday
author_sort Philip L Munday
title Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies.
title_short Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies.
title_full Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies.
title_fullStr Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies.
title_full_unstemmed Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies.
title_sort reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809
https://doaj.org/article/65ceffb2dd7f437e8d7537bfaa1a76a8
genre Ocean acidification
genre_facet Ocean acidification
op_source PLoS Biology, Vol 20, Iss 11, p e3001809 (2022)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809
https://doaj.org/toc/1544-9173
https://doaj.org/toc/1545-7885
1544-9173
1545-7885
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809
https://doaj.org/article/65ceffb2dd7f437e8d7537bfaa1a76a8
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809
container_title PLOS Biology
container_volume 20
container_issue 11
container_start_page e3001809
_version_ 1766156737965981696

Similar Items