Incorporating Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Impact Assessment—How Can It Be Done?

An obligation to consider traditional knowledge (TK) in planning, resource, and land management, particularly in Sami areas, has been formalized through the Nature Diversity Act. However, current Norwegian legislation and guidelines contain few clarifications of what TK is, how to approach it, or ho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Review on Law and Politics
Main Authors: Einar Eyþórsson, Alma Elizabeth Thuestad
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Norwegian
Published: Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP 2015
Subjects:
Law
K
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v6.101
https://doaj.org/article/657e889afb6c4aef9fe131c96cc84140
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:657e889afb6c4aef9fe131c96cc84140
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:657e889afb6c4aef9fe131c96cc84140 2023-05-15T14:21:29+02:00 Incorporating Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Impact Assessment—How Can It Be Done? Einar Eyþórsson Alma Elizabeth Thuestad 2015-11-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v6.101 https://doaj.org/article/657e889afb6c4aef9fe131c96cc84140 EN NO eng nor Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP http://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/101/209 https://doaj.org/toc/2387-4562 2387-4562 doi:10.17585/arctic.v6.101 https://doaj.org/article/657e889afb6c4aef9fe131c96cc84140 Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 6, Iss 2, Pp 132-150 (2015) Sami traditional knowledge land and resource use impact assessment Finnmark Commission Law K article 2015 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v6.101 2022-12-31T04:27:04Z An obligation to consider traditional knowledge (TK) in planning, resource, and land management, particularly in Sami areas, has been formalized through the Nature Diversity Act. However, current Norwegian legislation and guidelines contain few clarifications of what TK is, how to approach it, or how to appropriately include such data in assessment and planning processes. The Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research has incorporated TK about land and resource use in several impact assessments (IAs), building on a methodological approach applied for a number of review assignments for the Finnmark Commission. While the experiences from reviews for the Commission and IAs concerning Sami land and resource use may represent a step towards incorporating TK in Norwegian planning processes, the approach to documentation, methodology, and ethics in this field is open for debate. The same can be said of the formal frameworks for IA and the willingness to incorporate TK in planning programs, in general. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic review on law and politics Finnmark sami sami Finnmark Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Review on Law and Politics 6 2
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
Norwegian
topic Sami traditional knowledge
land and resource use
impact assessment
Finnmark Commission
Law
K
spellingShingle Sami traditional knowledge
land and resource use
impact assessment
Finnmark Commission
Law
K
Einar Eyþórsson
Alma Elizabeth Thuestad
Incorporating Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Impact Assessment—How Can It Be Done?
topic_facet Sami traditional knowledge
land and resource use
impact assessment
Finnmark Commission
Law
K
description An obligation to consider traditional knowledge (TK) in planning, resource, and land management, particularly in Sami areas, has been formalized through the Nature Diversity Act. However, current Norwegian legislation and guidelines contain few clarifications of what TK is, how to approach it, or how to appropriately include such data in assessment and planning processes. The Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research has incorporated TK about land and resource use in several impact assessments (IAs), building on a methodological approach applied for a number of review assignments for the Finnmark Commission. While the experiences from reviews for the Commission and IAs concerning Sami land and resource use may represent a step towards incorporating TK in Norwegian planning processes, the approach to documentation, methodology, and ethics in this field is open for debate. The same can be said of the formal frameworks for IA and the willingness to incorporate TK in planning programs, in general.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Einar Eyþórsson
Alma Elizabeth Thuestad
author_facet Einar Eyþórsson
Alma Elizabeth Thuestad
author_sort Einar Eyþórsson
title Incorporating Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Impact Assessment—How Can It Be Done?
title_short Incorporating Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Impact Assessment—How Can It Be Done?
title_full Incorporating Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Impact Assessment—How Can It Be Done?
title_fullStr Incorporating Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Impact Assessment—How Can It Be Done?
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Impact Assessment—How Can It Be Done?
title_sort incorporating traditional knowledge in environmental impact assessment—how can it be done?
publisher Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP
publishDate 2015
url https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v6.101
https://doaj.org/article/657e889afb6c4aef9fe131c96cc84140
genre Arctic
Arctic review on law and politics
Finnmark
sami
sami
Finnmark
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic review on law and politics
Finnmark
sami
sami
Finnmark
op_source Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 6, Iss 2, Pp 132-150 (2015)
op_relation http://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/101/209
https://doaj.org/toc/2387-4562
2387-4562
doi:10.17585/arctic.v6.101
https://doaj.org/article/657e889afb6c4aef9fe131c96cc84140
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v6.101
container_title Arctic Review on Law and Politics
container_volume 6
container_issue 2
_version_ 1766294211196354560