Improving permafrost physics in the coupled Canadian Land Surface Scheme (v.3.6.2) and Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (v.2.1) (CLASS-CTEM)

The Canadian Land Surface Scheme and Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CLASS-CTEM) together form the land surface component of the Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM). Here, we investigate the impact of changes to CLASS-CTEM that are designed to improve the simulation of permafrost physics. Ove...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geoscientific Model Development
Main Authors: J. R. Melton, D. L. Verseghy, R. Sospedra-Alfonso, S. Gruber
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4443-2019
https://doaj.org/article/632fa4df24ea4fc68733a067afb8ec09
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:632fa4df24ea4fc68733a067afb8ec09
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:632fa4df24ea4fc68733a067afb8ec09 2023-05-15T13:03:26+02:00 Improving permafrost physics in the coupled Canadian Land Surface Scheme (v.3.6.2) and Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (v.2.1) (CLASS-CTEM) J. R. Melton D. L. Verseghy R. Sospedra-Alfonso S. Gruber 2019-10-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4443-2019 https://doaj.org/article/632fa4df24ea4fc68733a067afb8ec09 EN eng Copernicus Publications https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/4443/2019/gmd-12-4443-2019.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1991-959X https://doaj.org/toc/1991-9603 doi:10.5194/gmd-12-4443-2019 1991-959X 1991-9603 https://doaj.org/article/632fa4df24ea4fc68733a067afb8ec09 Geoscientific Model Development, Vol 12, Pp 4443-4467 (2019) Geology QE1-996.5 article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4443-2019 2022-12-30T23:23:24Z The Canadian Land Surface Scheme and Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CLASS-CTEM) together form the land surface component of the Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM). Here, we investigate the impact of changes to CLASS-CTEM that are designed to improve the simulation of permafrost physics. Overall, 18 tests were performed, including changing the model configuration (number and depth of ground layers, different soil permeable depth datasets, adding a surface moss layer), and investigating alternative parameterizations of soil hydrology, soil thermal conductivity, and snow properties. To evaluate these changes, CLASS-CTEM outputs were compared to 1570 active layer thickness (ALT) measurements from 97 observation sites that are part of the Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost (GTN-P), 105 106 monthly ground temperature observations from 132 GTN-P borehole sites, a blend of five observation-based snow water equivalent (SWE) datasets (Blended-5), remotely sensed albedo, and seasonal discharge for major rivers draining permafrost regions. From the tests performed, the final revised model configuration has more ground layers (increased from 3 to 20) extending to greater depth (from 4.1 to 61.4 m) and uses a new soil permeable depths dataset with a surface layer of moss added. The most beneficial change to the model parameterizations was incorporation of unfrozen water in frozen soils. These changes to CLASS-CTEM cause a small improvement in simulated SWE with little change in surface albedo but greatly improve the model performance at the GTN-P ALT and borehole sites. Compared to the GTN-P observations, the revised CLASS-CTEM ALTs have a weighted mean absolute error (wMAE) of 0.41–0.47 m (depending on configuration), improved from >2.5 m for the original model, while the borehole sites see a consistent improvement in wMAE for most seasons and depths considered, with seasonal wMAE values for the shallow surface layers of the revised model simulation of at most 3.7 ∘ C, which is 1.2 ∘ C more than the wMAE ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Active layer thickness Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost GTN-P permafrost Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Geoscientific Model Development 12 10 4443 4467
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle Geology
QE1-996.5
J. R. Melton
D. L. Verseghy
R. Sospedra-Alfonso
S. Gruber
Improving permafrost physics in the coupled Canadian Land Surface Scheme (v.3.6.2) and Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (v.2.1) (CLASS-CTEM)
topic_facet Geology
QE1-996.5
description The Canadian Land Surface Scheme and Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CLASS-CTEM) together form the land surface component of the Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM). Here, we investigate the impact of changes to CLASS-CTEM that are designed to improve the simulation of permafrost physics. Overall, 18 tests were performed, including changing the model configuration (number and depth of ground layers, different soil permeable depth datasets, adding a surface moss layer), and investigating alternative parameterizations of soil hydrology, soil thermal conductivity, and snow properties. To evaluate these changes, CLASS-CTEM outputs were compared to 1570 active layer thickness (ALT) measurements from 97 observation sites that are part of the Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost (GTN-P), 105 106 monthly ground temperature observations from 132 GTN-P borehole sites, a blend of five observation-based snow water equivalent (SWE) datasets (Blended-5), remotely sensed albedo, and seasonal discharge for major rivers draining permafrost regions. From the tests performed, the final revised model configuration has more ground layers (increased from 3 to 20) extending to greater depth (from 4.1 to 61.4 m) and uses a new soil permeable depths dataset with a surface layer of moss added. The most beneficial change to the model parameterizations was incorporation of unfrozen water in frozen soils. These changes to CLASS-CTEM cause a small improvement in simulated SWE with little change in surface albedo but greatly improve the model performance at the GTN-P ALT and borehole sites. Compared to the GTN-P observations, the revised CLASS-CTEM ALTs have a weighted mean absolute error (wMAE) of 0.41–0.47 m (depending on configuration), improved from >2.5 m for the original model, while the borehole sites see a consistent improvement in wMAE for most seasons and depths considered, with seasonal wMAE values for the shallow surface layers of the revised model simulation of at most 3.7 ∘ C, which is 1.2 ∘ C more than the wMAE ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author J. R. Melton
D. L. Verseghy
R. Sospedra-Alfonso
S. Gruber
author_facet J. R. Melton
D. L. Verseghy
R. Sospedra-Alfonso
S. Gruber
author_sort J. R. Melton
title Improving permafrost physics in the coupled Canadian Land Surface Scheme (v.3.6.2) and Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (v.2.1) (CLASS-CTEM)
title_short Improving permafrost physics in the coupled Canadian Land Surface Scheme (v.3.6.2) and Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (v.2.1) (CLASS-CTEM)
title_full Improving permafrost physics in the coupled Canadian Land Surface Scheme (v.3.6.2) and Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (v.2.1) (CLASS-CTEM)
title_fullStr Improving permafrost physics in the coupled Canadian Land Surface Scheme (v.3.6.2) and Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (v.2.1) (CLASS-CTEM)
title_full_unstemmed Improving permafrost physics in the coupled Canadian Land Surface Scheme (v.3.6.2) and Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (v.2.1) (CLASS-CTEM)
title_sort improving permafrost physics in the coupled canadian land surface scheme (v.3.6.2) and canadian terrestrial ecosystem model (v.2.1) (class-ctem)
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4443-2019
https://doaj.org/article/632fa4df24ea4fc68733a067afb8ec09
genre Active layer thickness
Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost
GTN-P
permafrost
genre_facet Active layer thickness
Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost
GTN-P
permafrost
op_source Geoscientific Model Development, Vol 12, Pp 4443-4467 (2019)
op_relation https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/4443/2019/gmd-12-4443-2019.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1991-959X
https://doaj.org/toc/1991-9603
doi:10.5194/gmd-12-4443-2019
1991-959X
1991-9603
https://doaj.org/article/632fa4df24ea4fc68733a067afb8ec09
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4443-2019
container_title Geoscientific Model Development
container_volume 12
container_issue 10
container_start_page 4443
op_container_end_page 4467
_version_ 1766336787022610432