Nubia-Eurasia kinematics: an alternative interpretation from Mediterranean and North Atlantic evidence

It is argued that the Plio-Quaternary deformation pattern in the Mediterranean region is compatible with a SSWNNE convergence between Africa (Nubia) and Eurasia and that the significant difference between this kinematics and the one provided by global models (SSE-NNW convergence e.g., the NUVEL-1) m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of Geophysics
Main Authors: D. Albarello, D. Babbucci, M. Viti, E. Mantovani
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3073
https://doaj.org/article/60e7013078aa4842a7319fba85b8816c
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:60e7013078aa4842a7319fba85b8816c
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:60e7013078aa4842a7319fba85b8816c 2023-05-15T17:28:32+02:00 Nubia-Eurasia kinematics: an alternative interpretation from Mediterranean and North Atlantic evidence D. Albarello D. Babbucci M. Viti E. Mantovani 2007-06-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3073 https://doaj.org/article/60e7013078aa4842a7319fba85b8816c EN eng Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/3073 https://doaj.org/toc/1593-5213 https://doaj.org/toc/2037-416X doi:10.4401/ag-3073 1593-5213 2037-416X https://doaj.org/article/60e7013078aa4842a7319fba85b8816c Annals of Geophysics, Vol 50, Iss 3 (2007) Nubia-Eurasia kinematics Mediterranean region Plio-Quaternary deformation Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 Geophysics. Cosmic physics QC801-809 article 2007 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3073 2022-12-31T10:52:36Z It is argued that the Plio-Quaternary deformation pattern in the Mediterranean region is compatible with a SSWNNE convergence between Africa (Nubia) and Eurasia and that the significant difference between this kinematics and the one provided by global models (SSE-NNW convergence e.g., the NUVEL-1) may be due to the fact that those models interpret North Atlantic data by adopting an oversimplified two-plate configuration, which cannot account for the occurrence of significant seismotectonic activity inside the presumed Nubia and Eurasia blocks. It is shown that the adoption of a new plate configuration involving the Iberia and Morocco microplates, strongly suggested by geological and seismotectonic evidence, makes it possible to identify a kinematic model compatible within errors with the constraints recognized in the Mediterranean region and with the NUVEL-1 North Atlantic data set. Some considerations are made about why the present-day Nubia-Eurasia kinematic models inferred from geodetic observations are significantly different from long-term models, such as model NUVEL- 1 and the one proposed in this work. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Annals of Geophysics 50 3
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Nubia-Eurasia kinematics
Mediterranean region
Plio-Quaternary deformation
Meteorology. Climatology
QC851-999
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
spellingShingle Nubia-Eurasia kinematics
Mediterranean region
Plio-Quaternary deformation
Meteorology. Climatology
QC851-999
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
D. Albarello
D. Babbucci
M. Viti
E. Mantovani
Nubia-Eurasia kinematics: an alternative interpretation from Mediterranean and North Atlantic evidence
topic_facet Nubia-Eurasia kinematics
Mediterranean region
Plio-Quaternary deformation
Meteorology. Climatology
QC851-999
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
description It is argued that the Plio-Quaternary deformation pattern in the Mediterranean region is compatible with a SSWNNE convergence between Africa (Nubia) and Eurasia and that the significant difference between this kinematics and the one provided by global models (SSE-NNW convergence e.g., the NUVEL-1) may be due to the fact that those models interpret North Atlantic data by adopting an oversimplified two-plate configuration, which cannot account for the occurrence of significant seismotectonic activity inside the presumed Nubia and Eurasia blocks. It is shown that the adoption of a new plate configuration involving the Iberia and Morocco microplates, strongly suggested by geological and seismotectonic evidence, makes it possible to identify a kinematic model compatible within errors with the constraints recognized in the Mediterranean region and with the NUVEL-1 North Atlantic data set. Some considerations are made about why the present-day Nubia-Eurasia kinematic models inferred from geodetic observations are significantly different from long-term models, such as model NUVEL- 1 and the one proposed in this work.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author D. Albarello
D. Babbucci
M. Viti
E. Mantovani
author_facet D. Albarello
D. Babbucci
M. Viti
E. Mantovani
author_sort D. Albarello
title Nubia-Eurasia kinematics: an alternative interpretation from Mediterranean and North Atlantic evidence
title_short Nubia-Eurasia kinematics: an alternative interpretation from Mediterranean and North Atlantic evidence
title_full Nubia-Eurasia kinematics: an alternative interpretation from Mediterranean and North Atlantic evidence
title_fullStr Nubia-Eurasia kinematics: an alternative interpretation from Mediterranean and North Atlantic evidence
title_full_unstemmed Nubia-Eurasia kinematics: an alternative interpretation from Mediterranean and North Atlantic evidence
title_sort nubia-eurasia kinematics: an alternative interpretation from mediterranean and north atlantic evidence
publisher Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)
publishDate 2007
url https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3073
https://doaj.org/article/60e7013078aa4842a7319fba85b8816c
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Annals of Geophysics, Vol 50, Iss 3 (2007)
op_relation http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/3073
https://doaj.org/toc/1593-5213
https://doaj.org/toc/2037-416X
doi:10.4401/ag-3073
1593-5213
2037-416X
https://doaj.org/article/60e7013078aa4842a7319fba85b8816c
op_doi https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3073
container_title Annals of Geophysics
container_volume 50
container_issue 3
_version_ 1766121269393096704