Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques
This paper examines the individual recourse for unconstitutionality under the Congolese Constitution of 18 February 2006. It focuses on practical modalities for its exercise rather than analysing the merits of cases dealt with by the Congolese Constitutional Court. This recourse is now affected by t...
Published in: | Recht in Afrika |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | German English French |
Published: |
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118 https://doaj.org/article/5ec2062c65b748d88c37fb1674048bce |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:5ec2062c65b748d88c37fb1674048bce |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:5ec2062c65b748d88c37fb1674048bce 2023-05-15T13:48:22+02:00 Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques Balingene Kahombo 2018-05-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118 https://doaj.org/article/5ec2062c65b748d88c37fb1674048bce DE EN FR ger eng fre Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118 https://doaj.org/toc/2363-6270 2363-6270 doi:10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118 https://doaj.org/article/5ec2062c65b748d88c37fb1674048bce Recht in Afrika, Vol 20, Iss 2, Pp 118-146 (2018) Asia and Eurasia Africa Pacific Area and Antarctica KL-KWX article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118 2022-12-31T02:08:44Z This paper examines the individual recourse for unconstitutionality under the Congolese Constitution of 18 February 2006. It focuses on practical modalities for its exercise rather than analysing the merits of cases dealt with by the Congolese Constitutional Court. This recourse is now affected by the ambiguity of its legal framework, which has reduced the scope of article 162(2) of the Constitution and its efficacy, because of a misunderstanding created by the Organic Law of 15 October 2013 and the diverging jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice and the Constitutional Court. This ambiguity is contrary to the aspirations of the Congolese people to democracy, respect for human rights, legal security and rule of law which have informed the opening of constitutional justice to individuals in the Democratic Republic of Congo. In order to get out of this situation, the author recom- mends several legislative amendments or an appropriate jurisprudential option by the Con- stitutional Court concerning the basis of its competence ratione materiae and the admissi- bility of individual recourses submitted to its appreciation. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Pacific Recht in Afrika 20 2 118 146 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
German English French |
topic |
Asia and Eurasia Africa Pacific Area and Antarctica KL-KWX |
spellingShingle |
Asia and Eurasia Africa Pacific Area and Antarctica KL-KWX Balingene Kahombo Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques |
topic_facet |
Asia and Eurasia Africa Pacific Area and Antarctica KL-KWX |
description |
This paper examines the individual recourse for unconstitutionality under the Congolese Constitution of 18 February 2006. It focuses on practical modalities for its exercise rather than analysing the merits of cases dealt with by the Congolese Constitutional Court. This recourse is now affected by the ambiguity of its legal framework, which has reduced the scope of article 162(2) of the Constitution and its efficacy, because of a misunderstanding created by the Organic Law of 15 October 2013 and the diverging jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice and the Constitutional Court. This ambiguity is contrary to the aspirations of the Congolese people to democracy, respect for human rights, legal security and rule of law which have informed the opening of constitutional justice to individuals in the Democratic Republic of Congo. In order to get out of this situation, the author recom- mends several legislative amendments or an appropriate jurisprudential option by the Con- stitutional Court concerning the basis of its competence ratione materiae and the admissi- bility of individual recourses submitted to its appreciation. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Balingene Kahombo |
author_facet |
Balingene Kahombo |
author_sort |
Balingene Kahombo |
title |
Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques |
title_short |
Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques |
title_full |
Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques |
title_fullStr |
Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques |
title_full_unstemmed |
Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques |
title_sort |
les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques |
publisher |
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118 https://doaj.org/article/5ec2062c65b748d88c37fb1674048bce |
geographic |
Pacific |
geographic_facet |
Pacific |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctica |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctica |
op_source |
Recht in Afrika, Vol 20, Iss 2, Pp 118-146 (2018) |
op_relation |
https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118 https://doaj.org/toc/2363-6270 2363-6270 doi:10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118 https://doaj.org/article/5ec2062c65b748d88c37fb1674048bce |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118 |
container_title |
Recht in Afrika |
container_volume |
20 |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
118 |
op_container_end_page |
146 |
_version_ |
1766249172655144960 |