Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques

This paper examines the individual recourse for unconstitutionality under the Congolese Constitution of 18 February 2006. It focuses on practical modalities for its exercise rather than analysing the merits of cases dealt with by the Congolese Constitutional Court. This recourse is now affected by t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Recht in Afrika
Main Author: Balingene Kahombo
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:German
English
French
Published: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118
https://doaj.org/article/5ec2062c65b748d88c37fb1674048bce
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:5ec2062c65b748d88c37fb1674048bce
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:5ec2062c65b748d88c37fb1674048bce 2023-05-15T13:48:22+02:00 Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques Balingene Kahombo 2018-05-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118 https://doaj.org/article/5ec2062c65b748d88c37fb1674048bce DE EN FR ger eng fre Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118 https://doaj.org/toc/2363-6270 2363-6270 doi:10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118 https://doaj.org/article/5ec2062c65b748d88c37fb1674048bce Recht in Afrika, Vol 20, Iss 2, Pp 118-146 (2018) Asia and Eurasia Africa Pacific Area and Antarctica KL-KWX article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118 2022-12-31T02:08:44Z This paper examines the individual recourse for unconstitutionality under the Congolese Constitution of 18 February 2006. It focuses on practical modalities for its exercise rather than analysing the merits of cases dealt with by the Congolese Constitutional Court. This recourse is now affected by the ambiguity of its legal framework, which has reduced the scope of article 162(2) of the Constitution and its efficacy, because of a misunderstanding created by the Organic Law of 15 October 2013 and the diverging jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice and the Constitutional Court. This ambiguity is contrary to the aspirations of the Congolese people to democracy, respect for human rights, legal security and rule of law which have informed the opening of constitutional justice to individuals in the Democratic Republic of Congo. In order to get out of this situation, the author recom- mends several legislative amendments or an appropriate jurisprudential option by the Con- stitutional Court concerning the basis of its competence ratione materiae and the admissi- bility of individual recourses submitted to its appreciation. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Pacific Recht in Afrika 20 2 118 146
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language German
English
French
topic Asia and Eurasia
Africa
Pacific Area
and Antarctica
KL-KWX
spellingShingle Asia and Eurasia
Africa
Pacific Area
and Antarctica
KL-KWX
Balingene Kahombo
Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques
topic_facet Asia and Eurasia
Africa
Pacific Area
and Antarctica
KL-KWX
description This paper examines the individual recourse for unconstitutionality under the Congolese Constitution of 18 February 2006. It focuses on practical modalities for its exercise rather than analysing the merits of cases dealt with by the Congolese Constitutional Court. This recourse is now affected by the ambiguity of its legal framework, which has reduced the scope of article 162(2) of the Constitution and its efficacy, because of a misunderstanding created by the Organic Law of 15 October 2013 and the diverging jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice and the Constitutional Court. This ambiguity is contrary to the aspirations of the Congolese people to democracy, respect for human rights, legal security and rule of law which have informed the opening of constitutional justice to individuals in the Democratic Republic of Congo. In order to get out of this situation, the author recom- mends several legislative amendments or an appropriate jurisprudential option by the Con- stitutional Court concerning the basis of its competence ratione materiae and the admissi- bility of individual recourses submitted to its appreciation.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Balingene Kahombo
author_facet Balingene Kahombo
author_sort Balingene Kahombo
title Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques
title_short Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques
title_full Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques
title_fullStr Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques
title_full_unstemmed Les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques
title_sort les modalités d’exercice du recours individuel en inconstitutionnalité en droit positif congolais entre ambiguïté et nécessité de réforme juridiques
publisher Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118
https://doaj.org/article/5ec2062c65b748d88c37fb1674048bce
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Recht in Afrika, Vol 20, Iss 2, Pp 118-146 (2018)
op_relation https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118
https://doaj.org/toc/2363-6270
2363-6270
doi:10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118
https://doaj.org/article/5ec2062c65b748d88c37fb1674048bce
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2017-2-118
container_title Recht in Afrika
container_volume 20
container_issue 2
container_start_page 118
op_container_end_page 146
_version_ 1766249172655144960