LLIN evaluation in Uganda project (LLINEUP2): association between housing construction and malaria burden in 32 districts

• Published in: Malaria Journal
• Main Authors: Samuel Gonahasa, Martha Nassali, Catherine Maiteki‑Sebuguzi, Jane F. Namuganga, Jimmy Opigo, Isaiah Nabende, Jaffer Okiring, Adrienne Epstein, Katherine Snyman, Joaniter I. Nankabirwa, Moses R. Kamya, Grant Dorsey, Sarah G. Staedke
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2024
• Subjects: Malaria; House construction; Modern housing; Malaria incidence; Parasite prevalence; Uganda; Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine; RC955-962; Infectious and parasitic diseases; RC109-216; Arctic
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-024-05012-y; https://doaj.org/article/5d13868f55f34901b49e220291a39dde

Abstract Background Well-built housing limits mosquito entry and can reduce malaria transmission. The association between community-level housing and malaria burden in Uganda was assessed using data from randomly selected households near 64 health facilities in 32 districts. Methods Houses were classified as ‘improved’ (synthetic walls and roofs, eaves closed or absent) or ‘less-improved’ (all other construction). Associations between housing and parasitaemia were made using mixed effects logistic regression (individual-level) and multivariable fractional response logistic regression (community-level), and between housing and malaria incidence using multivariable Poisson regression. Results Between November 2021 and March 2022, 4.893 children aged 2–10 years were enrolled from 3.518 houses; of these, 1.389 (39.5%) were classified as improved. Children living in improved houses had 58% lower odds (adjusted odds ratio = 0.42, 95% CI 0.33–0.53, p < 0.0001) of parasitaemia than children living in less-improved houses. Communities with > 67% of houses improved had a 63% lower parasite prevalence (adjusted prevalence ratio 0.37, 95% CI 0.19–0.70, p < 0.0021) and 60% lower malaria incidence (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.36–0.44, p < 0.0001) compared to communities with < 39% of houses improved. Conclusions Improved housing was strongly associated with lower malaria burden across a range of settings in Uganda and should be utilized for malaria control.