Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case

Sovereignty acquired by occupation entails “recognize[d] title based on discovery,” “a reasonable period [of] … effective occupation of the region claimed to be discovered” and “the continuous and peaceful display of State authority.” Only terra nullius is subject to occupation. A territory inhabite...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Review on Law and Politics
Main Author: Peter Thomas Ørebech
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Norwegian
Published: Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP 2016
Subjects:
Law
K
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.262
https://doaj.org/article/5c68856927b8408291ec9b723ca772d7
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:5c68856927b8408291ec9b723ca772d7
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:5c68856927b8408291ec9b723ca772d7 2023-05-15T14:21:31+02:00 Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case Peter Thomas Ørebech 2016-05-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.262 https://doaj.org/article/5c68856927b8408291ec9b723ca772d7 EN NO eng nor Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/262/810 https://doaj.org/toc/2387-4562 2387-4562 doi:10.17585/arctic.v7.262 https://doaj.org/article/5c68856927b8408291ec9b723ca772d7 Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-22 (2016) discovery occupation sovereignty Norse and Indigenous peoples Inuits Eastern Greenland Case – Permanent Court of International Justice 1933 Law K article 2016 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.262 2022-12-31T05:00:18Z Sovereignty acquired by occupation entails “recognize[d] title based on discovery,” “a reasonable period [of] … effective occupation of the region claimed to be discovered” and “the continuous and peaceful display of State authority.” Only terra nullius is subject to occupation. A territory inhabited by indigenous groups that sustain social and political organization may impede an occupying power because the terra nullius requirement fails. While sovereignty over thinly populated areas are often lax, case law requires less public involvement in these sparsely inhabited areas. This study reveals that the Dano-Norwegian Kings regarded the Inuit as “our subjects.” The Kings’ pretention of absolutum dominium and jurisdiction involved both the Norse and Inuit ethnic groups and “bygð ok ubygð” (settled and unsettled) land. The exodus of the Norse peoples in 1450 AD for 200 years did not undermine the acquired sovereignty of the Dano-Norwegian Crown, which as a result, spoiled the 1931 Norwegian pretentions to legally occupy East-Greenland. Denmark's triumph in the 1933-East Greenland case resulted from a “zero-sum principle.” More than a 100 years earlier, the Danish Kingdom lost a succession of countries and dependencies. The 1814 Kiel Treaty transferred mainland Norway to Sweden, but explicitly states that none of the ancient Norwegian dependencies, Greenland, Iceland and Faroe Islands would follow suit. Thus, these territories remained part of the Kingdom of Denmark. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic review on law and politics East Greenland Faroe Islands Greenland Iceland inuit inuits Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Faroe Islands Greenland Norway Arctic Review on Law and Politics 7 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
Norwegian
topic discovery
occupation
sovereignty
Norse and Indigenous peoples
Inuits
Eastern Greenland Case – Permanent Court of International Justice 1933
Law
K
spellingShingle discovery
occupation
sovereignty
Norse and Indigenous peoples
Inuits
Eastern Greenland Case – Permanent Court of International Justice 1933
Law
K
Peter Thomas Ørebech
Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case
topic_facet discovery
occupation
sovereignty
Norse and Indigenous peoples
Inuits
Eastern Greenland Case – Permanent Court of International Justice 1933
Law
K
description Sovereignty acquired by occupation entails “recognize[d] title based on discovery,” “a reasonable period [of] … effective occupation of the region claimed to be discovered” and “the continuous and peaceful display of State authority.” Only terra nullius is subject to occupation. A territory inhabited by indigenous groups that sustain social and political organization may impede an occupying power because the terra nullius requirement fails. While sovereignty over thinly populated areas are often lax, case law requires less public involvement in these sparsely inhabited areas. This study reveals that the Dano-Norwegian Kings regarded the Inuit as “our subjects.” The Kings’ pretention of absolutum dominium and jurisdiction involved both the Norse and Inuit ethnic groups and “bygð ok ubygð” (settled and unsettled) land. The exodus of the Norse peoples in 1450 AD for 200 years did not undermine the acquired sovereignty of the Dano-Norwegian Crown, which as a result, spoiled the 1931 Norwegian pretentions to legally occupy East-Greenland. Denmark's triumph in the 1933-East Greenland case resulted from a “zero-sum principle.” More than a 100 years earlier, the Danish Kingdom lost a succession of countries and dependencies. The 1814 Kiel Treaty transferred mainland Norway to Sweden, but explicitly states that none of the ancient Norwegian dependencies, Greenland, Iceland and Faroe Islands would follow suit. Thus, these territories remained part of the Kingdom of Denmark.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Peter Thomas Ørebech
author_facet Peter Thomas Ørebech
author_sort Peter Thomas Ørebech
title Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case
title_short Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case
title_full Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case
title_fullStr Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case
title_full_unstemmed Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case
title_sort terra nullius, inuit habitation and norse occupation – with special emphasis on the 1933 east greenland case
publisher Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.262
https://doaj.org/article/5c68856927b8408291ec9b723ca772d7
geographic Faroe Islands
Greenland
Norway
geographic_facet Faroe Islands
Greenland
Norway
genre Arctic
Arctic review on law and politics
East Greenland
Faroe Islands
Greenland
Iceland
inuit
inuits
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic review on law and politics
East Greenland
Faroe Islands
Greenland
Iceland
inuit
inuits
op_source Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-22 (2016)
op_relation https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/262/810
https://doaj.org/toc/2387-4562
2387-4562
doi:10.17585/arctic.v7.262
https://doaj.org/article/5c68856927b8408291ec9b723ca772d7
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.262
container_title Arctic Review on Law and Politics
container_volume 7
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766294227445088256