Comparing elevation and backscatter retrievals from CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 over Arctic summer sea ice

The CryoSat-2 radar altimeter and ICESat-2 laser altimeter can provide complementary measurements of the freeboard and thickness of Arctic sea ice. However, both sensors face significant challenges for accurately measuring the ice freeboard when the sea ice is melting in summer months. Here, we used...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: G. J. Dawson, J. C. Landy
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4165-2023
https://doaj.org/article/5b244b03a4174e63a02a92dd7e76e5e3
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:5b244b03a4174e63a02a92dd7e76e5e3
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:5b244b03a4174e63a02a92dd7e76e5e3 2023-10-29T02:34:18+01:00 Comparing elevation and backscatter retrievals from CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 over Arctic summer sea ice G. J. Dawson J. C. Landy 2023-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4165-2023 https://doaj.org/article/5b244b03a4174e63a02a92dd7e76e5e3 EN eng Copernicus Publications https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/4165/2023/tc-17-4165-2023.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1994-0416 https://doaj.org/toc/1994-0424 doi:10.5194/tc-17-4165-2023 1994-0416 1994-0424 https://doaj.org/article/5b244b03a4174e63a02a92dd7e76e5e3 The Cryosphere, Vol 17, Pp 4165-4178 (2023) Environmental sciences GE1-350 Geology QE1-996.5 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4165-2023 2023-10-01T00:39:33Z The CryoSat-2 radar altimeter and ICESat-2 laser altimeter can provide complementary measurements of the freeboard and thickness of Arctic sea ice. However, both sensors face significant challenges for accurately measuring the ice freeboard when the sea ice is melting in summer months. Here, we used crossover points between CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 to compare elevation retrievals over summer sea ice between 2018–2021. We focused on the electromagnetic (EM) bias documented in CryoSat-2 measurements, associated with surface melt ponds over summer sea ice which cause the radar altimeter to underestimate elevation. The laser altimeter of ICESat-2 is not susceptible to this bias but has other biases associated with melt ponds. So, we compared the elevation difference and reflectance statistics between the two satellites. We found that CryoSat-2 underestimated elevation compared to ICESat-2 by a median difference of 2.4 cm and by a median absolute deviation of 5.3 cm, while the differences between individual ICESat-2 beams and CryoSat-2 ranged between 1–3.5 cm. Spatial and temporal patterns of the bias were compared to surface roughness information derived from the ICESat-2 elevation data, the ICESat-2 photon rate (surface reflectivity), the CryoSat-2 backscatter, and the melt pond fraction derived from Sentinel-3 Ocean and Land Color Instrument (OLCI) data. We found good agreement between theoretical predictions of the CryoSat-2 EM melt pond bias and our new observations; however, at typical roughness <0.1 m the experimentally measured bias was larger (5–10 cm) compared to biases resulting from the theoretical simulations (0–5 cm). This intercomparison will be valuable for interpreting and improving the summer sea ice freeboard retrievals from both altimeters. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Sea ice The Cryosphere Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles The Cryosphere 17 9 4165 4178
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Geology
QE1-996.5
G. J. Dawson
J. C. Landy
Comparing elevation and backscatter retrievals from CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 over Arctic summer sea ice
topic_facet Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Geology
QE1-996.5
description The CryoSat-2 radar altimeter and ICESat-2 laser altimeter can provide complementary measurements of the freeboard and thickness of Arctic sea ice. However, both sensors face significant challenges for accurately measuring the ice freeboard when the sea ice is melting in summer months. Here, we used crossover points between CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 to compare elevation retrievals over summer sea ice between 2018–2021. We focused on the electromagnetic (EM) bias documented in CryoSat-2 measurements, associated with surface melt ponds over summer sea ice which cause the radar altimeter to underestimate elevation. The laser altimeter of ICESat-2 is not susceptible to this bias but has other biases associated with melt ponds. So, we compared the elevation difference and reflectance statistics between the two satellites. We found that CryoSat-2 underestimated elevation compared to ICESat-2 by a median difference of 2.4 cm and by a median absolute deviation of 5.3 cm, while the differences between individual ICESat-2 beams and CryoSat-2 ranged between 1–3.5 cm. Spatial and temporal patterns of the bias were compared to surface roughness information derived from the ICESat-2 elevation data, the ICESat-2 photon rate (surface reflectivity), the CryoSat-2 backscatter, and the melt pond fraction derived from Sentinel-3 Ocean and Land Color Instrument (OLCI) data. We found good agreement between theoretical predictions of the CryoSat-2 EM melt pond bias and our new observations; however, at typical roughness <0.1 m the experimentally measured bias was larger (5–10 cm) compared to biases resulting from the theoretical simulations (0–5 cm). This intercomparison will be valuable for interpreting and improving the summer sea ice freeboard retrievals from both altimeters.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author G. J. Dawson
J. C. Landy
author_facet G. J. Dawson
J. C. Landy
author_sort G. J. Dawson
title Comparing elevation and backscatter retrievals from CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 over Arctic summer sea ice
title_short Comparing elevation and backscatter retrievals from CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 over Arctic summer sea ice
title_full Comparing elevation and backscatter retrievals from CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 over Arctic summer sea ice
title_fullStr Comparing elevation and backscatter retrievals from CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 over Arctic summer sea ice
title_full_unstemmed Comparing elevation and backscatter retrievals from CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 over Arctic summer sea ice
title_sort comparing elevation and backscatter retrievals from cryosat-2 and icesat-2 over arctic summer sea ice
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4165-2023
https://doaj.org/article/5b244b03a4174e63a02a92dd7e76e5e3
genre Arctic
Sea ice
The Cryosphere
genre_facet Arctic
Sea ice
The Cryosphere
op_source The Cryosphere, Vol 17, Pp 4165-4178 (2023)
op_relation https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/4165/2023/tc-17-4165-2023.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1994-0416
https://doaj.org/toc/1994-0424
doi:10.5194/tc-17-4165-2023
1994-0416
1994-0424
https://doaj.org/article/5b244b03a4174e63a02a92dd7e76e5e3
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4165-2023
container_title The Cryosphere
container_volume 17
container_issue 9
container_start_page 4165
op_container_end_page 4178
_version_ 1781056812581126144