Brief communication: An alternative method for estimating the scavenging efficiency of black carbon by meltwater over sea ice
The meltwater scavenging coefficient (MSC) of black carbon (BC) is a crucial parameter in snow and sea ice models, as it determines the BC enrichment in the surface layer of melting snow over sea ice and therefore modulates the BC–snow–albedo feedbacks. We present a new method for MSC estimation by...
Published in: | The Cryosphere |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-3309-2019 https://doaj.org/article/5a6f69a32a7d469f912dad0b13a7b7cd |
Summary: | The meltwater scavenging coefficient (MSC) of black carbon (BC) is a crucial parameter in snow and sea ice models, as it determines the BC enrichment in the surface layer of melting snow over sea ice and therefore modulates the BC–snow–albedo feedbacks. We present a new method for MSC estimation by sampling the melt–refreeze ice layer that is produced from refreezing of the meltwater within snowpack and its overlying snow and measuring their physical characteristics in Elson Lagoon northeast of Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska, during the melting season. The bias of estimated MSC ranges from −5.4 % to 7.3 %, which is not exactly dependent on the degree of ablation. The average MSC value calculated with this proposed method is slightly lower than that derived from the repeating sampling (RS) method in Elson Lagoon while still being within its best estimate range. Further estimation demonstrates that the MSC in the Canada Basin ( 23.6 % ±2.1 % ) is close to that in Greenland ( 23.0 % ±12.5 % ) and larger than that in the Chukchi Sea ( 17.9 % ±5.0 % ) in the northwest of Utqiaġvik. Elson Lagoon has the lowest MSC ( 14.5 % ±2.6 % ) in the study areas. The method suggested in this study provides a possible approach for large-scale measurements of MSC over the sea ice area in the Arctic. Of course, this method depends on the presence of a melt–refreeze ice layer in the observation area. |
---|