Incentive Systems That Support Sustainability: A First Nations Example

Prior to contact with European settlers, the incentive and governance systems used by First Nations peoples of the Northwest coast of North America provided more sustainable use of the fisheries and other resources of that region than did subsequent systems. This paper explores the major reason for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Conservation Ecology
Main Author: Ronald L. Trosper
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00058-020211
https://doaj.org/article/5a6d8403f6c94ffa9d51089349bd247d
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:5a6d8403f6c94ffa9d51089349bd247d
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:5a6d8403f6c94ffa9d51089349bd247d 2023-05-15T16:15:41+02:00 Incentive Systems That Support Sustainability: A First Nations Example Ronald L. Trosper 1998-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00058-020211 https://doaj.org/article/5a6d8403f6c94ffa9d51089349bd247d EN eng Resilience Alliance http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol2/iss2/art11/ https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087 1708-3087 doi:10.5751/ES-00058-020211 https://doaj.org/article/5a6d8403f6c94ffa9d51089349bd247d Ecology and Society, Vol 2, Iss 2, p 11 (1998) incentive systems ecological rationality ecosystem management sustainability potlatch First Nations American Indians common-pool resource Northwest Coast fishery property rights watershed ecosystem Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Ecology QH540-549.5 article 1998 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00058-020211 2022-12-31T08:09:27Z Prior to contact with European settlers, the incentive and governance systems used by First Nations peoples of the Northwest coast of North America provided more sustainable use of the fisheries and other resources of that region than did subsequent systems. This paper explores the major reason for that success: the requirements of the potlatch system that chiefs share their income with each other. Because chiefs controlled well-defined territories and subjected each other to review, the potlatch governance system embodied the characteristics of negative feedback, coordination, resiliency, and robustness that political scientist John Dryzek identifies as means to support ecological rationality in the management of ecosystems. This ecological rationality occurs because the sharing of income made chiefs aware of the effects that their actions had on the income of other chiefs. In addition, public discussions that occurred at feasts would allow chiefs to coordinate their actions as needed. The paper concludes with proposals for application of the potlatch system to modern circumstances. Such application means changing the rules for the distribution of income from using ecosystem resources so that all entities share their surplus income with each other. The potlatch system can be applied to modern organizations by noting that chief executive officers are like chiefs, that profit is like surplus income, and that corporations can be viewed as similar to the houses of the traditional Northwest systems. One major change is that profit is no longer privately owned, and must be shared with other organizations that use an ecosystem. Although controls on behavior mandated by state power would be reduced, a modernized potlatch system would still need to operate within a context provided by governments and international agreements. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Conservation Ecology 2 2
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic incentive systems
ecological rationality
ecosystem management
sustainability
potlatch
First Nations
American Indians
common-pool resource
Northwest Coast fishery
property rights
watershed ecosystem
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle incentive systems
ecological rationality
ecosystem management
sustainability
potlatch
First Nations
American Indians
common-pool resource
Northwest Coast fishery
property rights
watershed ecosystem
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Ronald L. Trosper
Incentive Systems That Support Sustainability: A First Nations Example
topic_facet incentive systems
ecological rationality
ecosystem management
sustainability
potlatch
First Nations
American Indians
common-pool resource
Northwest Coast fishery
property rights
watershed ecosystem
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
description Prior to contact with European settlers, the incentive and governance systems used by First Nations peoples of the Northwest coast of North America provided more sustainable use of the fisheries and other resources of that region than did subsequent systems. This paper explores the major reason for that success: the requirements of the potlatch system that chiefs share their income with each other. Because chiefs controlled well-defined territories and subjected each other to review, the potlatch governance system embodied the characteristics of negative feedback, coordination, resiliency, and robustness that political scientist John Dryzek identifies as means to support ecological rationality in the management of ecosystems. This ecological rationality occurs because the sharing of income made chiefs aware of the effects that their actions had on the income of other chiefs. In addition, public discussions that occurred at feasts would allow chiefs to coordinate their actions as needed. The paper concludes with proposals for application of the potlatch system to modern circumstances. Such application means changing the rules for the distribution of income from using ecosystem resources so that all entities share their surplus income with each other. The potlatch system can be applied to modern organizations by noting that chief executive officers are like chiefs, that profit is like surplus income, and that corporations can be viewed as similar to the houses of the traditional Northwest systems. One major change is that profit is no longer privately owned, and must be shared with other organizations that use an ecosystem. Although controls on behavior mandated by state power would be reduced, a modernized potlatch system would still need to operate within a context provided by governments and international agreements.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ronald L. Trosper
author_facet Ronald L. Trosper
author_sort Ronald L. Trosper
title Incentive Systems That Support Sustainability: A First Nations Example
title_short Incentive Systems That Support Sustainability: A First Nations Example
title_full Incentive Systems That Support Sustainability: A First Nations Example
title_fullStr Incentive Systems That Support Sustainability: A First Nations Example
title_full_unstemmed Incentive Systems That Support Sustainability: A First Nations Example
title_sort incentive systems that support sustainability: a first nations example
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 1998
url https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00058-020211
https://doaj.org/article/5a6d8403f6c94ffa9d51089349bd247d
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source Ecology and Society, Vol 2, Iss 2, p 11 (1998)
op_relation http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol2/iss2/art11/
https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087
1708-3087
doi:10.5751/ES-00058-020211
https://doaj.org/article/5a6d8403f6c94ffa9d51089349bd247d
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00058-020211
container_title Conservation Ecology
container_volume 2
container_issue 2
_version_ 1766001451271716864