Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia

Abstract Predation from large carnivores and human harvest are the two main mortality factors affecting the dynamics of many ungulate populations. We examined long-term moose (Alces alces) harvest data from two countries that share cross-border populations of wolves (Canis lupus) and their main prey...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific Reports
Main Authors: Camilla Wikenros, Håkan Sand, Johan Månsson, Erling Maartmann, Ane Eriksen, Petter Wabakken, Barbara Zimmermann
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2020
Subjects:
R
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8
https://doaj.org/article/578b511348ea439fbd25c2c2c2968813
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:578b511348ea439fbd25c2c2c2968813
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:578b511348ea439fbd25c2c2c2968813 2023-05-15T13:13:21+02:00 Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia Camilla Wikenros Håkan Sand Johan Månsson Erling Maartmann Ane Eriksen Petter Wabakken Barbara Zimmermann 2020-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8 https://doaj.org/article/578b511348ea439fbd25c2c2c2968813 EN eng Nature Portfolio https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8 https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8 2045-2322 https://doaj.org/article/578b511348ea439fbd25c2c2c2968813 Scientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020) Medicine R Science Q article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8 2022-12-31T08:59:39Z Abstract Predation from large carnivores and human harvest are the two main mortality factors affecting the dynamics of many ungulate populations. We examined long-term moose (Alces alces) harvest data from two countries that share cross-border populations of wolves (Canis lupus) and their main prey moose. We tested how a spatial gradient of increasing wolf territory density affected moose harvest density and age and sex composition of the harvested animals (n = 549,310), along a latitudinal gradient during 1995–2017. In areas containing average-sized wolf territories, harvest density was on average 37% (Norway) and 51% (Sweden) lower than in areas without wolves. In Sweden, calves made up a higher proportion of the moose harvest than in Norway, and this proportion was reduced with increased wolf territory density, while it increased in Norway. The proportion of females in the adult harvest was more strongly reduced in Sweden than in Norway as a response to increased wolf territory density. Moose management in both countries performed actions aimed to increase productivity in the moose population, in order to compensate for the increased mortality caused by wolves. These management actions are empirical examples of an adaptive management in response to the return of large carnivores. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Canis lupus Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Norway Scientific Reports 10 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Camilla Wikenros
Håkan Sand
Johan Månsson
Erling Maartmann
Ane Eriksen
Petter Wabakken
Barbara Zimmermann
Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia
topic_facet Medicine
R
Science
Q
description Abstract Predation from large carnivores and human harvest are the two main mortality factors affecting the dynamics of many ungulate populations. We examined long-term moose (Alces alces) harvest data from two countries that share cross-border populations of wolves (Canis lupus) and their main prey moose. We tested how a spatial gradient of increasing wolf territory density affected moose harvest density and age and sex composition of the harvested animals (n = 549,310), along a latitudinal gradient during 1995–2017. In areas containing average-sized wolf territories, harvest density was on average 37% (Norway) and 51% (Sweden) lower than in areas without wolves. In Sweden, calves made up a higher proportion of the moose harvest than in Norway, and this proportion was reduced with increased wolf territory density, while it increased in Norway. The proportion of females in the adult harvest was more strongly reduced in Sweden than in Norway as a response to increased wolf territory density. Moose management in both countries performed actions aimed to increase productivity in the moose population, in order to compensate for the increased mortality caused by wolves. These management actions are empirical examples of an adaptive management in response to the return of large carnivores.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Camilla Wikenros
Håkan Sand
Johan Månsson
Erling Maartmann
Ane Eriksen
Petter Wabakken
Barbara Zimmermann
author_facet Camilla Wikenros
Håkan Sand
Johan Månsson
Erling Maartmann
Ane Eriksen
Petter Wabakken
Barbara Zimmermann
author_sort Camilla Wikenros
title Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia
title_short Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia
title_full Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia
title_fullStr Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia
title_sort impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in scandinavia
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8
https://doaj.org/article/578b511348ea439fbd25c2c2c2968813
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Alces alces
Canis lupus
genre_facet Alces alces
Canis lupus
op_source Scientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8
https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322
doi:10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8
2045-2322
https://doaj.org/article/578b511348ea439fbd25c2c2c2968813
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8
container_title Scientific Reports
container_volume 10
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766257833510174720