Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia
Abstract Predation from large carnivores and human harvest are the two main mortality factors affecting the dynamics of many ungulate populations. We examined long-term moose (Alces alces) harvest data from two countries that share cross-border populations of wolves (Canis lupus) and their main prey...
Published in: | Scientific Reports |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8 https://doaj.org/article/578b511348ea439fbd25c2c2c2968813 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:578b511348ea439fbd25c2c2c2968813 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:578b511348ea439fbd25c2c2c2968813 2023-05-15T13:13:21+02:00 Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia Camilla Wikenros Håkan Sand Johan Månsson Erling Maartmann Ane Eriksen Petter Wabakken Barbara Zimmermann 2020-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8 https://doaj.org/article/578b511348ea439fbd25c2c2c2968813 EN eng Nature Portfolio https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8 https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8 2045-2322 https://doaj.org/article/578b511348ea439fbd25c2c2c2968813 Scientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020) Medicine R Science Q article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8 2022-12-31T08:59:39Z Abstract Predation from large carnivores and human harvest are the two main mortality factors affecting the dynamics of many ungulate populations. We examined long-term moose (Alces alces) harvest data from two countries that share cross-border populations of wolves (Canis lupus) and their main prey moose. We tested how a spatial gradient of increasing wolf territory density affected moose harvest density and age and sex composition of the harvested animals (n = 549,310), along a latitudinal gradient during 1995–2017. In areas containing average-sized wolf territories, harvest density was on average 37% (Norway) and 51% (Sweden) lower than in areas without wolves. In Sweden, calves made up a higher proportion of the moose harvest than in Norway, and this proportion was reduced with increased wolf territory density, while it increased in Norway. The proportion of females in the adult harvest was more strongly reduced in Sweden than in Norway as a response to increased wolf territory density. Moose management in both countries performed actions aimed to increase productivity in the moose population, in order to compensate for the increased mortality caused by wolves. These management actions are empirical examples of an adaptive management in response to the return of large carnivores. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Canis lupus Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Norway Scientific Reports 10 1 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Camilla Wikenros Håkan Sand Johan Månsson Erling Maartmann Ane Eriksen Petter Wabakken Barbara Zimmermann Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia |
topic_facet |
Medicine R Science Q |
description |
Abstract Predation from large carnivores and human harvest are the two main mortality factors affecting the dynamics of many ungulate populations. We examined long-term moose (Alces alces) harvest data from two countries that share cross-border populations of wolves (Canis lupus) and their main prey moose. We tested how a spatial gradient of increasing wolf territory density affected moose harvest density and age and sex composition of the harvested animals (n = 549,310), along a latitudinal gradient during 1995–2017. In areas containing average-sized wolf territories, harvest density was on average 37% (Norway) and 51% (Sweden) lower than in areas without wolves. In Sweden, calves made up a higher proportion of the moose harvest than in Norway, and this proportion was reduced with increased wolf territory density, while it increased in Norway. The proportion of females in the adult harvest was more strongly reduced in Sweden than in Norway as a response to increased wolf territory density. Moose management in both countries performed actions aimed to increase productivity in the moose population, in order to compensate for the increased mortality caused by wolves. These management actions are empirical examples of an adaptive management in response to the return of large carnivores. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Camilla Wikenros Håkan Sand Johan Månsson Erling Maartmann Ane Eriksen Petter Wabakken Barbara Zimmermann |
author_facet |
Camilla Wikenros Håkan Sand Johan Månsson Erling Maartmann Ane Eriksen Petter Wabakken Barbara Zimmermann |
author_sort |
Camilla Wikenros |
title |
Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia |
title_short |
Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia |
title_full |
Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia |
title_fullStr |
Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia |
title_sort |
impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in scandinavia |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8 https://doaj.org/article/578b511348ea439fbd25c2c2c2968813 |
geographic |
Norway |
geographic_facet |
Norway |
genre |
Alces alces Canis lupus |
genre_facet |
Alces alces Canis lupus |
op_source |
Scientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020) |
op_relation |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8 https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8 2045-2322 https://doaj.org/article/578b511348ea439fbd25c2c2c2968813 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8 |
container_title |
Scientific Reports |
container_volume |
10 |
container_issue |
1 |
_version_ |
1766257833510174720 |