Russian-Norwegian borderland in the foreign historical literature in the 20th — beginning of the 21st centuries

The article presents a review of foreign research on the history of Russian-Norwegian borderland in 16th — early 20th centuries. The dominance of the empirical positivism and historical nationalism in the history of the Northern frontier delimitation led to the formation of relatively stable and uni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic and North
Main Author: Konstantin S. Zaikov
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Russian
Published: Northern Arctic Federal University 2018
Subjects:
H
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.30.60
https://doaj.org/article/56abba35b9744d668485acc23684db8a
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:56abba35b9744d668485acc23684db8a
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:56abba35b9744d668485acc23684db8a 2023-05-15T15:12:20+02:00 Russian-Norwegian borderland in the foreign historical literature in the 20th — beginning of the 21st centuries Konstantin S. Zaikov 2018-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.30.60 https://doaj.org/article/56abba35b9744d668485acc23684db8a EN RU eng rus Northern Arctic Federal University https://narfu.ru/upload/iblock/e9e/04_Zaikov.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2221-2698 doi:10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.30.60 2221-2698 https://doaj.org/article/56abba35b9744d668485acc23684db8a Арктика и Север, Vol 30, Pp 49-61 (2018) history border frontier historiography the Russian-Norwegian relations the Russian-Norwegian borderland the Sami Social Sciences H article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.30.60 2022-12-30T20:15:00Z The article presents a review of foreign research on the history of Russian-Norwegian borderland in 16th — early 20th centuries. The dominance of the empirical positivism and historical nationalism in the history of the Northern frontier delimitation led to the formation of relatively stable and unilateral interpretations of the Russian-Norwegian border in the first half of the 20th century. The state was perceived as an a priori objective phenomenon. That’s why historians and legal scholars understood the “border” as a static instrument of political power, ignoring its multipotential phenomena and variety of its subjects. The Scandinavian historiography has developed a historical tradition of perception of the Treaty 1826 on the delimitation of “common districts” as a fair act of institutionalization of borders over the common possession. As a part of this tradition, it may seem that Norwegian territorial claims did not look expansive in relation to Russia. However, for a long time the Scandinavian historians advocated the theory that the Russian Empire, driven by the idea of permanent territorial extensions, had posed a threat to the Norwegian Finmark. So, the delineation of the Northern frontier was a diplomatic deal aimed at creating legitimate barriers to further Russian expansion in Western Europe through the Norwegian Arctic. Thus, the author concludes that from the methodological perspective, the evolution of the Russian-Norwegian borderlands is still not sufficiently developed in foreign historiography and requires closer attention to create high-quality reconstruction of the Russian-Norwegian borderland evolution from the territory with frontlines configuration of political boundaries in the 13th century — the early 19th century to the space with a sealed political boundary in the 20th century. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic sami Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Arctic and North 30 60 75
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
Russian
topic history
border
frontier
historiography
the Russian-Norwegian relations
the Russian-Norwegian borderland
the Sami
Social Sciences
H
spellingShingle history
border
frontier
historiography
the Russian-Norwegian relations
the Russian-Norwegian borderland
the Sami
Social Sciences
H
Konstantin S. Zaikov
Russian-Norwegian borderland in the foreign historical literature in the 20th — beginning of the 21st centuries
topic_facet history
border
frontier
historiography
the Russian-Norwegian relations
the Russian-Norwegian borderland
the Sami
Social Sciences
H
description The article presents a review of foreign research on the history of Russian-Norwegian borderland in 16th — early 20th centuries. The dominance of the empirical positivism and historical nationalism in the history of the Northern frontier delimitation led to the formation of relatively stable and unilateral interpretations of the Russian-Norwegian border in the first half of the 20th century. The state was perceived as an a priori objective phenomenon. That’s why historians and legal scholars understood the “border” as a static instrument of political power, ignoring its multipotential phenomena and variety of its subjects. The Scandinavian historiography has developed a historical tradition of perception of the Treaty 1826 on the delimitation of “common districts” as a fair act of institutionalization of borders over the common possession. As a part of this tradition, it may seem that Norwegian territorial claims did not look expansive in relation to Russia. However, for a long time the Scandinavian historians advocated the theory that the Russian Empire, driven by the idea of permanent territorial extensions, had posed a threat to the Norwegian Finmark. So, the delineation of the Northern frontier was a diplomatic deal aimed at creating legitimate barriers to further Russian expansion in Western Europe through the Norwegian Arctic. Thus, the author concludes that from the methodological perspective, the evolution of the Russian-Norwegian borderlands is still not sufficiently developed in foreign historiography and requires closer attention to create high-quality reconstruction of the Russian-Norwegian borderland evolution from the territory with frontlines configuration of political boundaries in the 13th century — the early 19th century to the space with a sealed political boundary in the 20th century.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Konstantin S. Zaikov
author_facet Konstantin S. Zaikov
author_sort Konstantin S. Zaikov
title Russian-Norwegian borderland in the foreign historical literature in the 20th — beginning of the 21st centuries
title_short Russian-Norwegian borderland in the foreign historical literature in the 20th — beginning of the 21st centuries
title_full Russian-Norwegian borderland in the foreign historical literature in the 20th — beginning of the 21st centuries
title_fullStr Russian-Norwegian borderland in the foreign historical literature in the 20th — beginning of the 21st centuries
title_full_unstemmed Russian-Norwegian borderland in the foreign historical literature in the 20th — beginning of the 21st centuries
title_sort russian-norwegian borderland in the foreign historical literature in the 20th — beginning of the 21st centuries
publisher Northern Arctic Federal University
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.30.60
https://doaj.org/article/56abba35b9744d668485acc23684db8a
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
sami
genre_facet Arctic
sami
op_source Арктика и Север, Vol 30, Pp 49-61 (2018)
op_relation https://narfu.ru/upload/iblock/e9e/04_Zaikov.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/2221-2698
doi:10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.30.60
2221-2698
https://doaj.org/article/56abba35b9744d668485acc23684db8a
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.30.60
container_title Arctic and North
container_volume 30
container_start_page 60
op_container_end_page 75
_version_ 1766343034698465280