Linking co-monitoring to co-management: bringing together local, traditional, and scientific knowledge in a wildlife status assessment framework

Effective wildlife management requires accurate and timely information on conservation status and trends, and knowledge of the factors driving population change. Reliable monitoring of wildlife population health, including disease, body condition, and population trends and demographics, is central t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Science
Main Authors: Stephanie J. Peacock, Fabien Mavrot, Matilde Tomaselli, Andrea Hanke, Heather Fenton, Rosemin Nathoo, Oscar Alejandro Aleuy, Juliette Di Francesco, Xavier Fernandez Aguilar, Naima Jutha, Pratap Kafle, Jesper Mosbacher, Annie Goose, Ekaluktutiak Hunters and Trappers Organization, Kugluktuk Angoniatit Association, Olokhaktomiut Hunters and Trappers Committee, Susan J. Kutz
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
French
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2019-0019
https://doaj.org/article/569f9f0958984929b74b1d22d4086931
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:569f9f0958984929b74b1d22d4086931
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:569f9f0958984929b74b1d22d4086931 2023-05-15T14:23:38+02:00 Linking co-monitoring to co-management: bringing together local, traditional, and scientific knowledge in a wildlife status assessment framework Stephanie J. Peacock Fabien Mavrot Matilde Tomaselli Andrea Hanke Heather Fenton Rosemin Nathoo Oscar Alejandro Aleuy Juliette Di Francesco Xavier Fernandez Aguilar Naima Jutha Pratap Kafle Jesper Mosbacher Annie Goose Ekaluktutiak Hunters and Trappers Organization Kugluktuk Angoniatit Association Olokhaktomiut Hunters and Trappers Committee Susan J. Kutz 2020-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2019-0019 https://doaj.org/article/569f9f0958984929b74b1d22d4086931 EN FR eng fre Canadian Science Publishing https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2019-0019 https://doaj.org/toc/2368-7460 doi:10.1139/as-2019-0019 2368-7460 https://doaj.org/article/569f9f0958984929b74b1d22d4086931 Arctic Science, Vol 6, Iss 3, Pp 247-266 (2020) wildlife health conservation traditional knowledge local knowledge status assessment angutikhat aaniaqtailini nunguttailini pitquhit ilihimani nunalikni ilihimani qanuritni naunaiyaqni Environmental sciences GE1-350 Environmental engineering TA170-171 article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2019-0019 2022-12-31T13:18:55Z Effective wildlife management requires accurate and timely information on conservation status and trends, and knowledge of the factors driving population change. Reliable monitoring of wildlife population health, including disease, body condition, and population trends and demographics, is central to achieving this, but conventional scientific monitoring alone is often not sufficient. Combining different approaches and knowledge types can provide a more holistic understanding than conventional science alone and can bridge gaps in scientific monitoring in remote and sparsely populated areas. Inclusion of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) is core to the wildlife co-management mandate of the Canadian territories and is usually included through consultation and engagement processes. We propose a status assessment framework that provides a systematic and transparent approach to including TEK, as well as local ecological knowledge (LEK), in the design, implementation, and interpretation of wildlife conservation status assessments. Drawing on a community-based monitoring program for muskoxen and caribou in northern Canada, we describe how scientific knowledge and TEK/LEK, documented through conventional monitoring, hunter-based sampling, or qualitative methods, can be brought together to inform indicators of wildlife health within our proposed assessment framework. Atuttiaqtut angutikhat aulatauni piyalgit nalaumayumik piyarakittumiklu tuhagakhat nunguttailininut qanuritni pitquhitlu, ilihimanilu pityutit pipkaqni amigaitnit alanguqni. Naahuriyaulat munarini angutikhat amigaitni aaniaqtailini, ilautitlugit aaniarutit, timai qanuritnit, amigaitnitlu pitquhit hiamaumanilu, atugauniqhauyut pitaqninut una, kihimik atuqtauvaktut naunaiyaiyit munariyauni kihimik amihuni naamangitmata. Ilaliutyaqni allatqit pityuhit ilihimanitlu qanuritni piqarutaulat tamatkiumaniqhanik kangiqhimani atuqtauvaktuniunganit naunaiyaiyit munarinit ahiniittut akuttuyunik amigaitni inait. Ilaliutyaqni pitquhit uumatyutit ilihimani (TEK) ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Canada Arctic Science 6 3 247 266
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
French
topic wildlife health
conservation
traditional knowledge local knowledge
status assessment
angutikhat aaniaqtailini
nunguttailini
pitquhit ilihimani
nunalikni ilihimani
qanuritni naunaiyaqni
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Environmental engineering
TA170-171
spellingShingle wildlife health
conservation
traditional knowledge local knowledge
status assessment
angutikhat aaniaqtailini
nunguttailini
pitquhit ilihimani
nunalikni ilihimani
qanuritni naunaiyaqni
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Environmental engineering
TA170-171
Stephanie J. Peacock
Fabien Mavrot
Matilde Tomaselli
Andrea Hanke
Heather Fenton
Rosemin Nathoo
Oscar Alejandro Aleuy
Juliette Di Francesco
Xavier Fernandez Aguilar
Naima Jutha
Pratap Kafle
Jesper Mosbacher
Annie Goose
Ekaluktutiak Hunters and Trappers Organization
Kugluktuk Angoniatit Association
Olokhaktomiut Hunters and Trappers Committee
Susan J. Kutz
Linking co-monitoring to co-management: bringing together local, traditional, and scientific knowledge in a wildlife status assessment framework
topic_facet wildlife health
conservation
traditional knowledge local knowledge
status assessment
angutikhat aaniaqtailini
nunguttailini
pitquhit ilihimani
nunalikni ilihimani
qanuritni naunaiyaqni
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Environmental engineering
TA170-171
description Effective wildlife management requires accurate and timely information on conservation status and trends, and knowledge of the factors driving population change. Reliable monitoring of wildlife population health, including disease, body condition, and population trends and demographics, is central to achieving this, but conventional scientific monitoring alone is often not sufficient. Combining different approaches and knowledge types can provide a more holistic understanding than conventional science alone and can bridge gaps in scientific monitoring in remote and sparsely populated areas. Inclusion of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) is core to the wildlife co-management mandate of the Canadian territories and is usually included through consultation and engagement processes. We propose a status assessment framework that provides a systematic and transparent approach to including TEK, as well as local ecological knowledge (LEK), in the design, implementation, and interpretation of wildlife conservation status assessments. Drawing on a community-based monitoring program for muskoxen and caribou in northern Canada, we describe how scientific knowledge and TEK/LEK, documented through conventional monitoring, hunter-based sampling, or qualitative methods, can be brought together to inform indicators of wildlife health within our proposed assessment framework. Atuttiaqtut angutikhat aulatauni piyalgit nalaumayumik piyarakittumiklu tuhagakhat nunguttailininut qanuritni pitquhitlu, ilihimanilu pityutit pipkaqni amigaitnit alanguqni. Naahuriyaulat munarini angutikhat amigaitni aaniaqtailini, ilautitlugit aaniarutit, timai qanuritnit, amigaitnitlu pitquhit hiamaumanilu, atugauniqhauyut pitaqninut una, kihimik atuqtauvaktut naunaiyaiyit munariyauni kihimik amihuni naamangitmata. Ilaliutyaqni allatqit pityuhit ilihimanitlu qanuritni piqarutaulat tamatkiumaniqhanik kangiqhimani atuqtauvaktuniunganit naunaiyaiyit munarinit ahiniittut akuttuyunik amigaitni inait. Ilaliutyaqni pitquhit uumatyutit ilihimani (TEK) ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Stephanie J. Peacock
Fabien Mavrot
Matilde Tomaselli
Andrea Hanke
Heather Fenton
Rosemin Nathoo
Oscar Alejandro Aleuy
Juliette Di Francesco
Xavier Fernandez Aguilar
Naima Jutha
Pratap Kafle
Jesper Mosbacher
Annie Goose
Ekaluktutiak Hunters and Trappers Organization
Kugluktuk Angoniatit Association
Olokhaktomiut Hunters and Trappers Committee
Susan J. Kutz
author_facet Stephanie J. Peacock
Fabien Mavrot
Matilde Tomaselli
Andrea Hanke
Heather Fenton
Rosemin Nathoo
Oscar Alejandro Aleuy
Juliette Di Francesco
Xavier Fernandez Aguilar
Naima Jutha
Pratap Kafle
Jesper Mosbacher
Annie Goose
Ekaluktutiak Hunters and Trappers Organization
Kugluktuk Angoniatit Association
Olokhaktomiut Hunters and Trappers Committee
Susan J. Kutz
author_sort Stephanie J. Peacock
title Linking co-monitoring to co-management: bringing together local, traditional, and scientific knowledge in a wildlife status assessment framework
title_short Linking co-monitoring to co-management: bringing together local, traditional, and scientific knowledge in a wildlife status assessment framework
title_full Linking co-monitoring to co-management: bringing together local, traditional, and scientific knowledge in a wildlife status assessment framework
title_fullStr Linking co-monitoring to co-management: bringing together local, traditional, and scientific knowledge in a wildlife status assessment framework
title_full_unstemmed Linking co-monitoring to co-management: bringing together local, traditional, and scientific knowledge in a wildlife status assessment framework
title_sort linking co-monitoring to co-management: bringing together local, traditional, and scientific knowledge in a wildlife status assessment framework
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2019-0019
https://doaj.org/article/569f9f0958984929b74b1d22d4086931
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Arctic Science, Vol 6, Iss 3, Pp 247-266 (2020)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2019-0019
https://doaj.org/toc/2368-7460
doi:10.1139/as-2019-0019
2368-7460
https://doaj.org/article/569f9f0958984929b74b1d22d4086931
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2019-0019
container_title Arctic Science
container_volume 6
container_issue 3
container_start_page 247
op_container_end_page 266
_version_ 1766296137138962432