Heat Flow on the U.S. Beaufort Margin, Arctic Ocean: Implications for Ocean Warming, Methane Hydrate Stability, and Regional Tectonics

• Published in: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
• Main Authors: Matthew J. Hornbach, Robert N. Harris, Benjamin J. Phrampus
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2020
• Subjects: Arctic; Beaufort; climate; heat flow; hydrate; ocean temperature; Geophysics. Cosmic physics; QC801-809; Geology; QE1-996.5; Arctic Ocean; Lister; Methane hydrate
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC008933; https://doaj.org/article/54e7e769672541078fdc76b7a3ef7d06

Abstract Results from the first focused heat flow study on the U.S. Beaufort Margin provide insight into decadal‐scale Arctic Ocean temperature change and raise new questions regarding Beaufort Margin evolution. This study measured heat flow using a 3.5‐m Lister probe at 103 sites oriented along four north‐south transects perpendicular to the ~700‐km long U.S. Beaufort Margin. The new heat flow measurements, corrected both for seasonal ocean temperature fluctuations and bathymetric effects, reveal low average heat flow values (~35 mW/m2) at seafloor depths of 300–900 m below sea level (mbsl) and anomalously high (~80 mW/m2) values at seafloor depths of >1,000 mbsl, near the predicted continent‐ocean transition. Anomalously low heat flow values measured on the upper margin are consistent with previous studies suggesting decadal‐scale ocean temperature warming to ~500 mbsl. Our results, however, indicate this ocean warming likely extends to depths as great at 900 mbsl—400 m deeper than previous studies suggest—implying widespread, ongoing, methane hydrate destabilization across much of the U.S. Beaufort Margin. The cause of the anomalously high heat flow values observed at seafloor depths >1,000 at the continent‐ocean transition is unclear. We suggest three candidate processes: (1) higher heat production and lower thermal conductivity on the margin edge due to the thickest sedimentary cover at the ocean‐continent transition, (2) seaward migrating subsurface advection, and (3) possible fault‐reactivation at the northern boundary of the Alaskan Microplate.