Validation of Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery from Laboratory Panel Characterization to Image Quality Assessment: Implications for an Arctic Peatland Surrogate Simulation Site

Calibration/validation (cal/val) practices applied to airborne hyperspectral imagery of Arctic regions were developed and assessed as an integrated up-scaling methodology that considers: (i) calibration of a laboratory reflectance reference panel; (ii) cross-calibration of multiple field panels; (ii...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Raymond J. Soffer, Gabriela Ifimov, Juan Pablo Arroyo-Mora, Margaret Kalacska
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
French
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019
Subjects:
T
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2019.1650334
https://doaj.org/article/54c4f467e79f4f6bb6cd48b7286a3af4
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:54c4f467e79f4f6bb6cd48b7286a3af4
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:54c4f467e79f4f6bb6cd48b7286a3af4 2024-09-09T19:21:57+00:00 Validation of Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery from Laboratory Panel Characterization to Image Quality Assessment: Implications for an Arctic Peatland Surrogate Simulation Site Raymond J. Soffer Gabriela Ifimov Juan Pablo Arroyo-Mora Margaret Kalacska 2019-07-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2019.1650334 https://doaj.org/article/54c4f467e79f4f6bb6cd48b7286a3af4 EN FR eng fre Taylor & Francis Group http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2019.1650334 https://doaj.org/toc/1712-7971 1712-7971 doi:10.1080/07038992.2019.1650334 https://doaj.org/article/54c4f467e79f4f6bb6cd48b7286a3af4 Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol 45, Iss 3-4, Pp 476-508 (2019) Environmental sciences GE1-350 Technology T article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2019.1650334 2024-08-05T17:49:16Z Calibration/validation (cal/val) practices applied to airborne hyperspectral imagery of Arctic regions were developed and assessed as an integrated up-scaling methodology that considers: (i) calibration of a laboratory reflectance reference panel; (ii) cross-calibration of multiple field panels; (iii) quality assurance checks of field spectroscopy data; and, (iv) comparison of results with airborne hyperspectral imagery. Overall errors of up to 27% were reduced to <4% using these methods. Calibration results of the laboratory panel provided an improvement of 1% in the visible, near and lower shortwave infrared regions with respect to best estimates achievable using manufacturer supplied calibration data. This improvement was transferred to field panels using an in-house cross-calibration approach that also allowed panels to be assessed for degradation that occurs during field deployment. Comparison of the field spectroscopy results of four cal/val targets with hyperspectral imagery following atmospheric correction identified discrepancies from 1% to 4% (absolute) between 450 nm and 1050 nm, with errors as high as 27% at lower wavelengths. Application of scene-based refinements using two cal/val targets reduced this error across the entire spectral range (<4%) with the most significant improvements below 500 nm. These methods also have important implications to satellite image analysis, especially in Arctic and northern regions. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 45 3-4 476 508
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
French
topic Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Technology
T
spellingShingle Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Technology
T
Raymond J. Soffer
Gabriela Ifimov
Juan Pablo Arroyo-Mora
Margaret Kalacska
Validation of Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery from Laboratory Panel Characterization to Image Quality Assessment: Implications for an Arctic Peatland Surrogate Simulation Site
topic_facet Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Technology
T
description Calibration/validation (cal/val) practices applied to airborne hyperspectral imagery of Arctic regions were developed and assessed as an integrated up-scaling methodology that considers: (i) calibration of a laboratory reflectance reference panel; (ii) cross-calibration of multiple field panels; (iii) quality assurance checks of field spectroscopy data; and, (iv) comparison of results with airborne hyperspectral imagery. Overall errors of up to 27% were reduced to <4% using these methods. Calibration results of the laboratory panel provided an improvement of 1% in the visible, near and lower shortwave infrared regions with respect to best estimates achievable using manufacturer supplied calibration data. This improvement was transferred to field panels using an in-house cross-calibration approach that also allowed panels to be assessed for degradation that occurs during field deployment. Comparison of the field spectroscopy results of four cal/val targets with hyperspectral imagery following atmospheric correction identified discrepancies from 1% to 4% (absolute) between 450 nm and 1050 nm, with errors as high as 27% at lower wavelengths. Application of scene-based refinements using two cal/val targets reduced this error across the entire spectral range (<4%) with the most significant improvements below 500 nm. These methods also have important implications to satellite image analysis, especially in Arctic and northern regions.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Raymond J. Soffer
Gabriela Ifimov
Juan Pablo Arroyo-Mora
Margaret Kalacska
author_facet Raymond J. Soffer
Gabriela Ifimov
Juan Pablo Arroyo-Mora
Margaret Kalacska
author_sort Raymond J. Soffer
title Validation of Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery from Laboratory Panel Characterization to Image Quality Assessment: Implications for an Arctic Peatland Surrogate Simulation Site
title_short Validation of Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery from Laboratory Panel Characterization to Image Quality Assessment: Implications for an Arctic Peatland Surrogate Simulation Site
title_full Validation of Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery from Laboratory Panel Characterization to Image Quality Assessment: Implications for an Arctic Peatland Surrogate Simulation Site
title_fullStr Validation of Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery from Laboratory Panel Characterization to Image Quality Assessment: Implications for an Arctic Peatland Surrogate Simulation Site
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery from Laboratory Panel Characterization to Image Quality Assessment: Implications for an Arctic Peatland Surrogate Simulation Site
title_sort validation of airborne hyperspectral imagery from laboratory panel characterization to image quality assessment: implications for an arctic peatland surrogate simulation site
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2019.1650334
https://doaj.org/article/54c4f467e79f4f6bb6cd48b7286a3af4
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol 45, Iss 3-4, Pp 476-508 (2019)
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2019.1650334
https://doaj.org/toc/1712-7971
1712-7971
doi:10.1080/07038992.2019.1650334
https://doaj.org/article/54c4f467e79f4f6bb6cd48b7286a3af4
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2019.1650334
container_title Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing
container_volume 45
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 476
op_container_end_page 508
_version_ 1809762232849924096