Importance of mountain height and latitude for the altitudinal distribution limits of vascular plants in Scandinavia: are the mountains high enough?

The main aim of the present paper was to study regional differences in the altitudinal distribution limits of vascular plants in relation to mountain height and latitudinal position. Altitudinal limits from previously studied areas were compared with the altitudinal distribution limits given by Lid...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Arvid Odland
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Geographical Society of Finland 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/534baaa16e844d1194e5df34bb9ce517
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:534baaa16e844d1194e5df34bb9ce517
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:534baaa16e844d1194e5df34bb9ce517 2023-05-15T17:43:37+02:00 Importance of mountain height and latitude for the altitudinal distribution limits of vascular plants in Scandinavia: are the mountains high enough? Arvid Odland 2010-11-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/534baaa16e844d1194e5df34bb9ce517 EN eng Geographical Society of Finland https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/2845 https://doaj.org/toc/1798-5617 1798-5617 https://doaj.org/article/534baaa16e844d1194e5df34bb9ce517 Fennia: International Journal of Geography, Vol 188, Iss 2 (2010) Scandinavia distribution limit forest limit mountain summits climatic change Geography (General) G1-922 article 2010 ftdoajarticles 2022-12-31T09:06:40Z The main aim of the present paper was to study regional differences in the altitudinal distribution limits of vascular plants in relation to mountain height and latitudinal position. Altitudinal limits from previously studied areas were compared with the altitudinal distribution limits given by Lid & Lid (2005) as a reference. Based on these comparisons, different trend lines were used to evaluate the effects of mountain height and thereby estimate how high a mountain must be for vascular plants to reach their potential altitudinal limits. Study areas were Hardangervidda and Aurland southern Norway, Jämtland central Sweden, Lule Lappmark northern Sweden, Troms northern Norway, and Graubünden Switzerland. A regression analysis of the altitudinal limits for 177 vascular plants in Scandinavia compared with the same species in Switzerland gave a highly significant (p < 0.001) linear equation with a slope coefficient of 0.95 and a Y-intercept of 1057. Species limits in Hardangervidda, Aurland and Jämtland, however, showed non-linear altitudinal trends for the whole mountain ranges when they were compared with the highest recorded limits for the same species in Scandinavia. Differences between the recorded altitudinal limits from Scandinavia and the same species from Switzerland were in average the same for lowland, boreal and high altitudinal species (p > 0.422). Comparisons within Scandinavia show that lowland/boreal and high altitudinal species showed different altitudinal distribution patterns. The position of the forest limit increased on average with 72.4 m per degree increase in latitude from Switzerland to N Scandinavia. The altitudinal span of the alpine zone was approximately 1100 m in Switzerland and in Jotunheimen but considerably lower in the south Scandinavian study areas. Studies of altitudinal distribution limits of vascular plants may give an indication of to what extent the height of a particular mountain influence plant distribution and thereby its vegetation zonation. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Norway Northern Sweden Troms Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Norway Lule Lappmark ENVELOPE(20.000,20.000,67.000,67.000)
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Scandinavia
distribution limit
forest limit
mountain summits
climatic change
Geography (General)
G1-922
spellingShingle Scandinavia
distribution limit
forest limit
mountain summits
climatic change
Geography (General)
G1-922
Arvid Odland
Importance of mountain height and latitude for the altitudinal distribution limits of vascular plants in Scandinavia: are the mountains high enough?
topic_facet Scandinavia
distribution limit
forest limit
mountain summits
climatic change
Geography (General)
G1-922
description The main aim of the present paper was to study regional differences in the altitudinal distribution limits of vascular plants in relation to mountain height and latitudinal position. Altitudinal limits from previously studied areas were compared with the altitudinal distribution limits given by Lid & Lid (2005) as a reference. Based on these comparisons, different trend lines were used to evaluate the effects of mountain height and thereby estimate how high a mountain must be for vascular plants to reach their potential altitudinal limits. Study areas were Hardangervidda and Aurland southern Norway, Jämtland central Sweden, Lule Lappmark northern Sweden, Troms northern Norway, and Graubünden Switzerland. A regression analysis of the altitudinal limits for 177 vascular plants in Scandinavia compared with the same species in Switzerland gave a highly significant (p < 0.001) linear equation with a slope coefficient of 0.95 and a Y-intercept of 1057. Species limits in Hardangervidda, Aurland and Jämtland, however, showed non-linear altitudinal trends for the whole mountain ranges when they were compared with the highest recorded limits for the same species in Scandinavia. Differences between the recorded altitudinal limits from Scandinavia and the same species from Switzerland were in average the same for lowland, boreal and high altitudinal species (p > 0.422). Comparisons within Scandinavia show that lowland/boreal and high altitudinal species showed different altitudinal distribution patterns. The position of the forest limit increased on average with 72.4 m per degree increase in latitude from Switzerland to N Scandinavia. The altitudinal span of the alpine zone was approximately 1100 m in Switzerland and in Jotunheimen but considerably lower in the south Scandinavian study areas. Studies of altitudinal distribution limits of vascular plants may give an indication of to what extent the height of a particular mountain influence plant distribution and thereby its vegetation zonation.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Arvid Odland
author_facet Arvid Odland
author_sort Arvid Odland
title Importance of mountain height and latitude for the altitudinal distribution limits of vascular plants in Scandinavia: are the mountains high enough?
title_short Importance of mountain height and latitude for the altitudinal distribution limits of vascular plants in Scandinavia: are the mountains high enough?
title_full Importance of mountain height and latitude for the altitudinal distribution limits of vascular plants in Scandinavia: are the mountains high enough?
title_fullStr Importance of mountain height and latitude for the altitudinal distribution limits of vascular plants in Scandinavia: are the mountains high enough?
title_full_unstemmed Importance of mountain height and latitude for the altitudinal distribution limits of vascular plants in Scandinavia: are the mountains high enough?
title_sort importance of mountain height and latitude for the altitudinal distribution limits of vascular plants in scandinavia: are the mountains high enough?
publisher Geographical Society of Finland
publishDate 2010
url https://doaj.org/article/534baaa16e844d1194e5df34bb9ce517
long_lat ENVELOPE(20.000,20.000,67.000,67.000)
geographic Norway
Lule Lappmark
geographic_facet Norway
Lule Lappmark
genre Northern Norway
Northern Sweden
Troms
genre_facet Northern Norway
Northern Sweden
Troms
op_source Fennia: International Journal of Geography, Vol 188, Iss 2 (2010)
op_relation https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/2845
https://doaj.org/toc/1798-5617
1798-5617
https://doaj.org/article/534baaa16e844d1194e5df34bb9ce517
_version_ 1766145746190467072