Impact of a spatial repellent product on Anopheles and non-Anopheles mosquitoes in Sumba, Indonesia
Abstract Background The East Nusa Tenggara province, Indonesia, contributed to 5% of malaria cases nationally in 2020, with other mosquito-borne diseases, such as dengue and filariasis also being endemic. Monitoring of spatial and temporal vector species compositions and bionomic traits is an effici...
Published in: | Malaria Journal |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04185-8 https://doaj.org/article/52af96d7eac447d994c19e93cdd2ecee |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:52af96d7eac447d994c19e93cdd2ecee |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:52af96d7eac447d994c19e93cdd2ecee 2023-05-15T15:15:47+02:00 Impact of a spatial repellent product on Anopheles and non-Anopheles mosquitoes in Sumba, Indonesia Dendi H. Permana Siti Zubaidah Lepa Syahrani Puji B. S. Asih Din Syafruddin Ismail E. Rozi Anggi P. N. Hidayati Sully Kosasih Farahana K. Dewayanti Nia Rachmawati Rifqi Risandi Michael J. Bangs Claus Bøgh Jenna R. Davidson Allison L. Hendershot Timothy A. Burton John P. Grieco Evercita C. Eugenio Fang Liu Nicole L. Achee Neil F. Lobo 2022-06-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04185-8 https://doaj.org/article/52af96d7eac447d994c19e93cdd2ecee EN eng BMC https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04185-8 https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875 doi:10.1186/s12936-022-04185-8 1475-2875 https://doaj.org/article/52af96d7eac447d994c19e93cdd2ecee Malaria Journal, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2022) Spatial repellent Anthropophagic Anopheles Mosquitoes Sumba Indonesia Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 article 2022 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04185-8 2022-12-30T23:15:45Z Abstract Background The East Nusa Tenggara province, Indonesia, contributed to 5% of malaria cases nationally in 2020, with other mosquito-borne diseases, such as dengue and filariasis also being endemic. Monitoring of spatial and temporal vector species compositions and bionomic traits is an efficient method for generating evidence towards intervention strategy optimization and meeting disease elimination goals. Methods The impact of a spatial repellent (SR) on human biting mosquitoes was evaluated as part of a parent cluster-randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, in Sumba, East Nusa Tenggara. A 10-month (June 2015–March 2016) baseline study was followed by a 24-month intervention period (April 2016 to April 2018)—where half the clusters were randomly assigned either a passive transfluthrin emanator or a placebo control. Results Human-landing mosquito catches documented a reduction in landing rates related to the SR. Overall, there was a 16.4% reduction (21% indoors, and 11.3% outdoors) in human biting rates (HBR) for Anopheles. For Aedes, there was a 44.3% HBR reduction indoors and a 35.6% reduction outdoors. This reduction was 38.3% indoors and 39.1% outdoors for Armigeres, and 36.0% indoors and 32.3% outdoors for Culex species. Intervention impacts on the HBRs were not significant and are attributed to large inter-household and inter cluster variation. Anopheles flavirostris, Anopheles balabacensis and Anopheles maculatus individually impacted the overall malaria infections hazard rate with statistically significance. Though there was SR-based protection against malaria for all Anopheles species (except Anopheles sundaicus), only five (Anopheles aconitus, Anopheles kochi, Anopheles tessellatus, An. maculatus and An. sundaicus) demonstrated statistical significance. The SR numerically reduced Anopheles parity rates indoors and outdoors when compared to the placebo. Conclusion Evidence demonstrating that Anopheles vectors bite both indoors and outdoors indicates that currently implemented ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Sumba ENVELOPE(-6.712,-6.712,61.403,61.403) Malaria Journal 21 1 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
Spatial repellent Anthropophagic Anopheles Mosquitoes Sumba Indonesia Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 |
spellingShingle |
Spatial repellent Anthropophagic Anopheles Mosquitoes Sumba Indonesia Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 Dendi H. Permana Siti Zubaidah Lepa Syahrani Puji B. S. Asih Din Syafruddin Ismail E. Rozi Anggi P. N. Hidayati Sully Kosasih Farahana K. Dewayanti Nia Rachmawati Rifqi Risandi Michael J. Bangs Claus Bøgh Jenna R. Davidson Allison L. Hendershot Timothy A. Burton John P. Grieco Evercita C. Eugenio Fang Liu Nicole L. Achee Neil F. Lobo Impact of a spatial repellent product on Anopheles and non-Anopheles mosquitoes in Sumba, Indonesia |
topic_facet |
Spatial repellent Anthropophagic Anopheles Mosquitoes Sumba Indonesia Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 |
description |
Abstract Background The East Nusa Tenggara province, Indonesia, contributed to 5% of malaria cases nationally in 2020, with other mosquito-borne diseases, such as dengue and filariasis also being endemic. Monitoring of spatial and temporal vector species compositions and bionomic traits is an efficient method for generating evidence towards intervention strategy optimization and meeting disease elimination goals. Methods The impact of a spatial repellent (SR) on human biting mosquitoes was evaluated as part of a parent cluster-randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, in Sumba, East Nusa Tenggara. A 10-month (June 2015–March 2016) baseline study was followed by a 24-month intervention period (April 2016 to April 2018)—where half the clusters were randomly assigned either a passive transfluthrin emanator or a placebo control. Results Human-landing mosquito catches documented a reduction in landing rates related to the SR. Overall, there was a 16.4% reduction (21% indoors, and 11.3% outdoors) in human biting rates (HBR) for Anopheles. For Aedes, there was a 44.3% HBR reduction indoors and a 35.6% reduction outdoors. This reduction was 38.3% indoors and 39.1% outdoors for Armigeres, and 36.0% indoors and 32.3% outdoors for Culex species. Intervention impacts on the HBRs were not significant and are attributed to large inter-household and inter cluster variation. Anopheles flavirostris, Anopheles balabacensis and Anopheles maculatus individually impacted the overall malaria infections hazard rate with statistically significance. Though there was SR-based protection against malaria for all Anopheles species (except Anopheles sundaicus), only five (Anopheles aconitus, Anopheles kochi, Anopheles tessellatus, An. maculatus and An. sundaicus) demonstrated statistical significance. The SR numerically reduced Anopheles parity rates indoors and outdoors when compared to the placebo. Conclusion Evidence demonstrating that Anopheles vectors bite both indoors and outdoors indicates that currently implemented ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Dendi H. Permana Siti Zubaidah Lepa Syahrani Puji B. S. Asih Din Syafruddin Ismail E. Rozi Anggi P. N. Hidayati Sully Kosasih Farahana K. Dewayanti Nia Rachmawati Rifqi Risandi Michael J. Bangs Claus Bøgh Jenna R. Davidson Allison L. Hendershot Timothy A. Burton John P. Grieco Evercita C. Eugenio Fang Liu Nicole L. Achee Neil F. Lobo |
author_facet |
Dendi H. Permana Siti Zubaidah Lepa Syahrani Puji B. S. Asih Din Syafruddin Ismail E. Rozi Anggi P. N. Hidayati Sully Kosasih Farahana K. Dewayanti Nia Rachmawati Rifqi Risandi Michael J. Bangs Claus Bøgh Jenna R. Davidson Allison L. Hendershot Timothy A. Burton John P. Grieco Evercita C. Eugenio Fang Liu Nicole L. Achee Neil F. Lobo |
author_sort |
Dendi H. Permana |
title |
Impact of a spatial repellent product on Anopheles and non-Anopheles mosquitoes in Sumba, Indonesia |
title_short |
Impact of a spatial repellent product on Anopheles and non-Anopheles mosquitoes in Sumba, Indonesia |
title_full |
Impact of a spatial repellent product on Anopheles and non-Anopheles mosquitoes in Sumba, Indonesia |
title_fullStr |
Impact of a spatial repellent product on Anopheles and non-Anopheles mosquitoes in Sumba, Indonesia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of a spatial repellent product on Anopheles and non-Anopheles mosquitoes in Sumba, Indonesia |
title_sort |
impact of a spatial repellent product on anopheles and non-anopheles mosquitoes in sumba, indonesia |
publisher |
BMC |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04185-8 https://doaj.org/article/52af96d7eac447d994c19e93cdd2ecee |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-6.712,-6.712,61.403,61.403) |
geographic |
Arctic Sumba |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Sumba |
genre |
Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic |
op_source |
Malaria Journal, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2022) |
op_relation |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04185-8 https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875 doi:10.1186/s12936-022-04185-8 1475-2875 https://doaj.org/article/52af96d7eac447d994c19e93cdd2ecee |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04185-8 |
container_title |
Malaria Journal |
container_volume |
21 |
container_issue |
1 |
_version_ |
1766346123637686272 |