Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU

In light of Bill C-92, which establishes a framework for delegating child and family service provision to Indigenous communities, this article addresses the contested regulation of employment and labour relations in Indigenous social service workplaces. It approaches this subject by looking back at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:aboriginal policy studies
Main Authors: Adam King, Veldon Coburn, Leah Vosko, Rebecca Hall, Olena Lyubchenko, Andie Noack
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
French
Published: University of Alberta 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5663/aps.v10i1.29399
https://doaj.org/article/5209a0927a1a498a865f5eda7b00a35d
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:5209a0927a1a498a865f5eda7b00a35d
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:5209a0927a1a498a865f5eda7b00a35d 2023-05-15T16:16:00+02:00 Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU Adam King Veldon Coburn Leah Vosko Rebecca Hall Olena Lyubchenko Andie Noack 2022-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5663/aps.v10i1.29399 https://doaj.org/article/5209a0927a1a498a865f5eda7b00a35d EN FR eng fre University of Alberta https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/aps/index.php/aps/article/view/29399 https://doaj.org/toc/1923-3299 doi:10.5663/aps.v10i1.29399 1923-3299 https://doaj.org/article/5209a0927a1a498a865f5eda7b00a35d Aboriginal Policy Studies, Vol 10, Iss 1 (2022) Anthropology GN1-890 Communities. Classes. Races HT51-1595 article 2022 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5663/aps.v10i1.29399 2022-12-30T22:17:00Z In light of Bill C-92, which establishes a framework for delegating child and family service provision to Indigenous communities, this article addresses the contested regulation of employment and labour relations in Indigenous social service workplaces. It approaches this subject by looking back at NIL/TU,O Child and Family Services Society v. B.C. Government and Service Employees’ Union, a case in which employees at a First Nations child and family services provider attempted to unionize. NIL/TU,O set in motion a legal battle over the jurisdiction of Indigenous labour relations that ultimately reached the Supreme Court of Canada in 2010. The SCC’s determined that the labours of the Indigenous workers at NIȽ TU,O Child and Family Services are a matter of provincial jurisdiction because they fall outside of the “core of Indianness,“ a contested legal concept used to designate federal legislative power over First Nations peoples. Using Indigenous feminisms and a feminist political economy approach, we argue that this decision rests on gendered appraisals – and, indeed, obfuscations – of social reproduction labour. Bill C-92 necessitates revisiting the case history in NIL/TU,O because of the ways in which it seems to conflict with the new Act. We suggest that the uncertainty surrounding jurisdiction over Indigenous labour has the dual potential of, on the one hand, being used strategically for exploitative or dis-possessive purposes, or, on the other hand, taken up as a opening for increased self-determination by Indigenous peoples. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Canada aboriginal policy studies 10 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
French
topic Anthropology
GN1-890
Communities. Classes. Races
HT51-1595
spellingShingle Anthropology
GN1-890
Communities. Classes. Races
HT51-1595
Adam King
Veldon Coburn
Leah Vosko
Rebecca Hall
Olena Lyubchenko
Andie Noack
Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU
topic_facet Anthropology
GN1-890
Communities. Classes. Races
HT51-1595
description In light of Bill C-92, which establishes a framework for delegating child and family service provision to Indigenous communities, this article addresses the contested regulation of employment and labour relations in Indigenous social service workplaces. It approaches this subject by looking back at NIL/TU,O Child and Family Services Society v. B.C. Government and Service Employees’ Union, a case in which employees at a First Nations child and family services provider attempted to unionize. NIL/TU,O set in motion a legal battle over the jurisdiction of Indigenous labour relations that ultimately reached the Supreme Court of Canada in 2010. The SCC’s determined that the labours of the Indigenous workers at NIȽ TU,O Child and Family Services are a matter of provincial jurisdiction because they fall outside of the “core of Indianness,“ a contested legal concept used to designate federal legislative power over First Nations peoples. Using Indigenous feminisms and a feminist political economy approach, we argue that this decision rests on gendered appraisals – and, indeed, obfuscations – of social reproduction labour. Bill C-92 necessitates revisiting the case history in NIL/TU,O because of the ways in which it seems to conflict with the new Act. We suggest that the uncertainty surrounding jurisdiction over Indigenous labour has the dual potential of, on the one hand, being used strategically for exploitative or dis-possessive purposes, or, on the other hand, taken up as a opening for increased self-determination by Indigenous peoples.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Adam King
Veldon Coburn
Leah Vosko
Rebecca Hall
Olena Lyubchenko
Andie Noack
author_facet Adam King
Veldon Coburn
Leah Vosko
Rebecca Hall
Olena Lyubchenko
Andie Noack
author_sort Adam King
title Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU
title_short Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU
title_full Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU
title_fullStr Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU
title_full_unstemmed Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU
title_sort determining the “core of indianness:” a feminist political economy of nil/tu,o v. bcgeu
publisher University of Alberta
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.5663/aps.v10i1.29399
https://doaj.org/article/5209a0927a1a498a865f5eda7b00a35d
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source Aboriginal Policy Studies, Vol 10, Iss 1 (2022)
op_relation https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/aps/index.php/aps/article/view/29399
https://doaj.org/toc/1923-3299
doi:10.5663/aps.v10i1.29399
1923-3299
https://doaj.org/article/5209a0927a1a498a865f5eda7b00a35d
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5663/aps.v10i1.29399
container_title aboriginal policy studies
container_volume 10
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766001858885713920