STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF MOOSE IN THE PARKLAND AND GRASSLAND NATURAL REGIONS OF ALBERTA

Moose (Alces alces) naturally colonized the Parkland Natural Region of Alberta during the 1980s and early 1990s, and later colonized the Grassland Natural Region by the early 2000s. We summarize population data during 1996–2016 for these regions, examining density, population trends, productivity, d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ronald R. Bjorge, Delaney Anderson, Emily Herdman, Scott Stevens
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Lakehead University 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/50a78214c05340248c7804051015ff68
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:50a78214c05340248c7804051015ff68
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:50a78214c05340248c7804051015ff68 2023-05-15T13:13:24+02:00 STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF MOOSE IN THE PARKLAND AND GRASSLAND NATURAL REGIONS OF ALBERTA Ronald R. Bjorge Delaney Anderson Emily Herdman Scott Stevens 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/50a78214c05340248c7804051015ff68 EN eng Lakehead University http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/232/269 https://doaj.org/toc/0835-5851 0835-5851 https://doaj.org/article/50a78214c05340248c7804051015ff68 Alces, Vol 54, Pp 17-84 (2018) Population Demography Management Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Ecology QH540-549.5 article 2018 ftdoajarticles 2022-12-30T22:47:40Z Moose (Alces alces) naturally colonized the Parkland Natural Region of Alberta during the 1980s and early 1990s, and later colonized the Grassland Natural Region by the early 2000s. We summarize population data during 1996–2016 for these regions, examining density, population trends, productivity, distribution, management, and moose-human conflicts to determine population status and sustainability. Within the Parkland, aerial surveys from one frequently monitored Wildlife Management Unit (WMU) indicated a significant increase (R2 = 0.7476, P < 0.001) in density, representing an annual rate of change of 1.07. Pooled data from an additional 21 Parkland WMUs indicated a mean annual rate of change of 1.11. Mean density for the 22 Parkland WMUs over the study period was 0.19 ± 0.06 moose/km2, and aerial surveys indicated a mean of 74.4 ± 3.6 calves/100 cows and 51.9 ± 2.9 bulls/100 cows. Within the Grassland, winter aerial survey data from 4 WMUs indicated a mean density of 0.05 ± 0.01 moose/km2, and 72.5 ± 6.75 calves/100 cows and 108.8 ± 34.4 bulls/100 cows. Hunting in these regions has been managed with a limited entry hunt. Resident rifle hunting opportunity for moose in the Parkland and Grassland increased 4.2-fold between 1996 and 2015. Opportunity in this region also represented an increasing proportion of that available province-wide, from 3.4% in 1996 to 19.8% in 2015. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Parkland ENVELOPE(-120.570,-120.570,55.917,55.917)
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Population Demography
Management
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Population Demography
Management
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Ronald R. Bjorge
Delaney Anderson
Emily Herdman
Scott Stevens
STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF MOOSE IN THE PARKLAND AND GRASSLAND NATURAL REGIONS OF ALBERTA
topic_facet Population Demography
Management
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
description Moose (Alces alces) naturally colonized the Parkland Natural Region of Alberta during the 1980s and early 1990s, and later colonized the Grassland Natural Region by the early 2000s. We summarize population data during 1996–2016 for these regions, examining density, population trends, productivity, distribution, management, and moose-human conflicts to determine population status and sustainability. Within the Parkland, aerial surveys from one frequently monitored Wildlife Management Unit (WMU) indicated a significant increase (R2 = 0.7476, P < 0.001) in density, representing an annual rate of change of 1.07. Pooled data from an additional 21 Parkland WMUs indicated a mean annual rate of change of 1.11. Mean density for the 22 Parkland WMUs over the study period was 0.19 ± 0.06 moose/km2, and aerial surveys indicated a mean of 74.4 ± 3.6 calves/100 cows and 51.9 ± 2.9 bulls/100 cows. Within the Grassland, winter aerial survey data from 4 WMUs indicated a mean density of 0.05 ± 0.01 moose/km2, and 72.5 ± 6.75 calves/100 cows and 108.8 ± 34.4 bulls/100 cows. Hunting in these regions has been managed with a limited entry hunt. Resident rifle hunting opportunity for moose in the Parkland and Grassland increased 4.2-fold between 1996 and 2015. Opportunity in this region also represented an increasing proportion of that available province-wide, from 3.4% in 1996 to 19.8% in 2015.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ronald R. Bjorge
Delaney Anderson
Emily Herdman
Scott Stevens
author_facet Ronald R. Bjorge
Delaney Anderson
Emily Herdman
Scott Stevens
author_sort Ronald R. Bjorge
title STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF MOOSE IN THE PARKLAND AND GRASSLAND NATURAL REGIONS OF ALBERTA
title_short STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF MOOSE IN THE PARKLAND AND GRASSLAND NATURAL REGIONS OF ALBERTA
title_full STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF MOOSE IN THE PARKLAND AND GRASSLAND NATURAL REGIONS OF ALBERTA
title_fullStr STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF MOOSE IN THE PARKLAND AND GRASSLAND NATURAL REGIONS OF ALBERTA
title_full_unstemmed STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF MOOSE IN THE PARKLAND AND GRASSLAND NATURAL REGIONS OF ALBERTA
title_sort status and management of moose in the parkland and grassland natural regions of alberta
publisher Lakehead University
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/50a78214c05340248c7804051015ff68
long_lat ENVELOPE(-120.570,-120.570,55.917,55.917)
geographic Parkland
geographic_facet Parkland
genre Alces alces
genre_facet Alces alces
op_source Alces, Vol 54, Pp 17-84 (2018)
op_relation http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/232/269
https://doaj.org/toc/0835-5851
0835-5851
https://doaj.org/article/50a78214c05340248c7804051015ff68
_version_ 1766258097539514368