Global Whole Lithosphere Isostasy: Implications for Surface Elevations, Structure, Strength, and Densities of the Continental Lithosphere

Abstract The observed variations in the thickness of the conductive lithosphere, derived from surface wave studies, have a first‐order control on the elevation of the continents, in addition to variations in the thickness of the crust—this defines whole lithosphere isostasy (WLI). Negative buoyancy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Main Authors: Simon Lamb, James D. P. Moore, Marta Perez‐Gussinye, Tim Stern
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009150
https://doaj.org/article/4e3703bf1dd04ceeade5327ec1440663
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:4e3703bf1dd04ceeade5327ec1440663
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:4e3703bf1dd04ceeade5327ec1440663 2023-12-03T10:13:49+01:00 Global Whole Lithosphere Isostasy: Implications for Surface Elevations, Structure, Strength, and Densities of the Continental Lithosphere Simon Lamb James D. P. Moore Marta Perez‐Gussinye Tim Stern 2020-10-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009150 https://doaj.org/article/4e3703bf1dd04ceeade5327ec1440663 EN eng Wiley https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009150 https://doaj.org/toc/1525-2027 1525-2027 doi:10.1029/2020GC009150 https://doaj.org/article/4e3703bf1dd04ceeade5327ec1440663 Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, Vol 21, Iss 10, Pp n/a-n/a (2020) Airy isostasy whole lithosphere isostasy surface elevations lithospheric density contrasts Antarctic crustal structure elastic thickness Geophysics. Cosmic physics QC801-809 Geology QE1-996.5 article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009150 2023-11-05T01:36:02Z Abstract The observed variations in the thickness of the conductive lithosphere, derived from surface wave studies, have a first‐order control on the elevation of the continents, in addition to variations in the thickness of the crust—this defines whole lithosphere isostasy (WLI). Negative buoyancy of the mantle lithosphere counters the positive buoyancy of the crust, and together, their respective thicknesses and density contrasts determine elevation of the continents both in their interiors and at their edges. The average density contrasts for lithospheric mantle with crust and with asthenosphere are typically 300 to 550 and 20 to 40 kg m−3, respectively, with a ratio 10 to 16, suggesting moderate average depletion of lithospheric mantle. We show that a crustal model for Antarctica, assuming WLI and using these density contrasts, provides a close fit to estimates of crustal thickness from surface wave tomography and gravity observations. We use a global model of WLI as a framework to assess factors controlling topography, showing that plausible regional variations in crustal and mantle densities, together with uncertainties in the crustal and conductive lithospheric thicknesses, are sufficient to account for global elevations without invoking dynamic topography greater than a few hundred meters. Estimates of elastic thickness Te in the continents are typically 25–50% of the thickness of the conductive lithosphere, indicating that the mantle part supports some of the elastic strength of the lithosphere. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Antarctic Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 21 10
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Airy isostasy
whole lithosphere isostasy
surface elevations
lithospheric density contrasts
Antarctic crustal structure
elastic thickness
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle Airy isostasy
whole lithosphere isostasy
surface elevations
lithospheric density contrasts
Antarctic crustal structure
elastic thickness
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
Geology
QE1-996.5
Simon Lamb
James D. P. Moore
Marta Perez‐Gussinye
Tim Stern
Global Whole Lithosphere Isostasy: Implications for Surface Elevations, Structure, Strength, and Densities of the Continental Lithosphere
topic_facet Airy isostasy
whole lithosphere isostasy
surface elevations
lithospheric density contrasts
Antarctic crustal structure
elastic thickness
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
Geology
QE1-996.5
description Abstract The observed variations in the thickness of the conductive lithosphere, derived from surface wave studies, have a first‐order control on the elevation of the continents, in addition to variations in the thickness of the crust—this defines whole lithosphere isostasy (WLI). Negative buoyancy of the mantle lithosphere counters the positive buoyancy of the crust, and together, their respective thicknesses and density contrasts determine elevation of the continents both in their interiors and at their edges. The average density contrasts for lithospheric mantle with crust and with asthenosphere are typically 300 to 550 and 20 to 40 kg m−3, respectively, with a ratio 10 to 16, suggesting moderate average depletion of lithospheric mantle. We show that a crustal model for Antarctica, assuming WLI and using these density contrasts, provides a close fit to estimates of crustal thickness from surface wave tomography and gravity observations. We use a global model of WLI as a framework to assess factors controlling topography, showing that plausible regional variations in crustal and mantle densities, together with uncertainties in the crustal and conductive lithospheric thicknesses, are sufficient to account for global elevations without invoking dynamic topography greater than a few hundred meters. Estimates of elastic thickness Te in the continents are typically 25–50% of the thickness of the conductive lithosphere, indicating that the mantle part supports some of the elastic strength of the lithosphere.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Simon Lamb
James D. P. Moore
Marta Perez‐Gussinye
Tim Stern
author_facet Simon Lamb
James D. P. Moore
Marta Perez‐Gussinye
Tim Stern
author_sort Simon Lamb
title Global Whole Lithosphere Isostasy: Implications for Surface Elevations, Structure, Strength, and Densities of the Continental Lithosphere
title_short Global Whole Lithosphere Isostasy: Implications for Surface Elevations, Structure, Strength, and Densities of the Continental Lithosphere
title_full Global Whole Lithosphere Isostasy: Implications for Surface Elevations, Structure, Strength, and Densities of the Continental Lithosphere
title_fullStr Global Whole Lithosphere Isostasy: Implications for Surface Elevations, Structure, Strength, and Densities of the Continental Lithosphere
title_full_unstemmed Global Whole Lithosphere Isostasy: Implications for Surface Elevations, Structure, Strength, and Densities of the Continental Lithosphere
title_sort global whole lithosphere isostasy: implications for surface elevations, structure, strength, and densities of the continental lithosphere
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009150
https://doaj.org/article/4e3703bf1dd04ceeade5327ec1440663
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
op_source Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, Vol 21, Iss 10, Pp n/a-n/a (2020)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009150
https://doaj.org/toc/1525-2027
1525-2027
doi:10.1029/2020GC009150
https://doaj.org/article/4e3703bf1dd04ceeade5327ec1440663
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009150
container_title Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
container_volume 21
container_issue 10
_version_ 1784260753330536448