Notes on Agreement in Itelmen

• Published in: Linguistic Discovery
• Main Authors: Jonathan David Bobaljik, Susi Wurmbrand
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Dartmouth College Library 2002
• Subjects: prominence hierarchy; ergative; Chuckchi; person hierarchy; ergativity; absolutive; ditransitive; intransitive; transitive; agreement; Itelmen; suffixal agreement; Alutor; agglutination; oblique agreement; object agreement; agglutinative; morphology; Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar; P101-410
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.21; https://doaj.org/article/4d817b322e724637b92ae51bf25cc93b

Agreement in Itelmen is represented by means of both prefixes and suffixes. While the prefixes reference subjects (of both transitive and intransitive verbs), the suffixal agreement morphemes on a given verb may reference the subject, the object, or an oblique argument, or some combination of these. We propose that the proper characterization of the factors that determine which arguments control suffixal agreement involves a division of labour between morphology and a notion of discourse prominence/salience. In essence, we propose that the suffixal agreement morpheme is an object agreement marker, but the features of the subject are reflected in this position when the object lacks the relevant features (for example, we treat third person as the lack of a person feature), or is absent altogether (thus, intransitive verbs agree twice with their subjects). When a verb occurs with an oblique as well as a direct object, discourse salience will determine which of these non-subject arguments will control object agreement. In addition to providing a description of a complex range of facts from Itelmen, the paper sheds light on the nature of “multiple exponence” and the role of “competition” among affixes for a particular position in the verbal agreement system.