A sublimation technique for high-precision measurements of δ 13 CO 2 and mixing ratios of CO 2 and N 2 O from air trapped in ice cores
In order to provide high precision stable carbon isotope ratios (δ 13 CO 2 or δ 13 C of CO 2 ) from small bubbly, partially and fully clathrated ice core samples we developed a new method based on sublimation coupled to gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS). In a first step th...
Published in: | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1445-2011 https://doaj.org/article/4aa669b0d6e74baa9f348a87f96a24e7 |
Summary: | In order to provide high precision stable carbon isotope ratios (δ 13 CO 2 or δ 13 C of CO 2 ) from small bubbly, partially and fully clathrated ice core samples we developed a new method based on sublimation coupled to gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS). In a first step the trapped air is quantitatively released from ~30 g of ice and CO 2 together with N 2 O are separated from the bulk air components and stored in a miniature glass tube. In an off-line step, the extracted sample is introduced into a helium carrier flow using a minimised tube cracker device. Prior to measurement, N 2 O and organic sample contaminants are gas chromatographically separated from CO 2 . Pulses of a CO 2 /N 2 O mixture are admitted to the tube cracker and follow the path of the sample through the system. This allows an identical treatment and comparison of sample and standard peaks. The ability of the method to reproduce δ 13 C from bubble and clathrate ice is verified on different ice cores. We achieve reproducibilities for bubble ice between 0.05 ‰ and 0.07 ‰ and for clathrate ice between 0.05 ‰ and 0.09 ‰ (dependent on the ice core used). A comparison of our data with measurements on bubble ice from the same ice core but using a mechanical extraction device shows no significant systematic offset. In addition to δ 13 C, the CO 2 and N 2 O mixing ratios can be volumetrically derived with a precision of 2 ppmv and 8 ppbv, respectively. |
---|