Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri?
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2019 4(2), 641-653 | European Forum Insight of 21 June 2019 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduzione. - II. Il caso AMP Antarctique di fronte alla Corte di giustizia. - III. Il giudizio della Corte: tra ripartizione delle competen...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English Spanish French Italian |
Published: |
European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/308 https://doaj.org/article/4a43d67ae2ed4e38bf5aca257e2a052e |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:4a43d67ae2ed4e38bf5aca257e2a052e |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:4a43d67ae2ed4e38bf5aca257e2a052e 2023-05-15T13:58:48+02:00 Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri? Susanna Villani 2019-06-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/308 https://doaj.org/article/4a43d67ae2ed4e38bf5aca257e2a052e EN ES FR IT eng spa fre ita European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/riflessioni-a-margine-di-sentenza-di-corte-di-giustizia-in-amp-antarctica https://doaj.org/toc/2499-8249 2499-8249 doi:10.15166/2499-8249/308 https://doaj.org/article/4a43d67ae2ed4e38bf5aca257e2a052e European Papers, Vol 2019 4, Iss 2, Pp 641-653 (2019) external action eu competences art. 218 para. 9 tfeu institutional framework international agreements action for annulment Law K Law of Europe KJ-KKZ article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/308 2022-12-31T10:49:27Z (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2019 4(2), 641-653 | European Forum Insight of 21 June 2019 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduzione. - II. Il caso AMP Antarctique di fronte alla Corte di giustizia. - III. Il giudizio della Corte: tra ripartizione delle competenze e diritto internazionale. - IV. La sentenza della Corte di giustizia: una mossa in controtendenza a favore degli Stati membri? - V. Osservazioni conclusive. | (Abstract) In November 2018, the Court of Justice ruled on the so-called Antarctica case (judgment of 20 November 2018, joined cases C‑626/15 e C‑659/16, Commission v. Council) on two actions of annulment brought by the Commission against Council decisions approving the submission to the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources ("the CCAMLR") of a reflection paper and a common position on four proposals concerning the creation and study of marine protected areas. The point concerned was the question of on behalf of whom the paper and the positions at issue could be submitted: the Union alone or the Union together with its Member States? Although it had no echo on the doctrinal level, the orientation assumed from the Court does introduce important elements, in particular in relation to the EU institutional framework as well as to the balance between Member States and the Union in terms of external action. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Antarctique* Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Antarctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English Spanish French Italian |
topic |
external action eu competences art. 218 para. 9 tfeu institutional framework international agreements action for annulment Law K Law of Europe KJ-KKZ |
spellingShingle |
external action eu competences art. 218 para. 9 tfeu institutional framework international agreements action for annulment Law K Law of Europe KJ-KKZ Susanna Villani Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri? |
topic_facet |
external action eu competences art. 218 para. 9 tfeu institutional framework international agreements action for annulment Law K Law of Europe KJ-KKZ |
description |
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2019 4(2), 641-653 | European Forum Insight of 21 June 2019 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduzione. - II. Il caso AMP Antarctique di fronte alla Corte di giustizia. - III. Il giudizio della Corte: tra ripartizione delle competenze e diritto internazionale. - IV. La sentenza della Corte di giustizia: una mossa in controtendenza a favore degli Stati membri? - V. Osservazioni conclusive. | (Abstract) In November 2018, the Court of Justice ruled on the so-called Antarctica case (judgment of 20 November 2018, joined cases C‑626/15 e C‑659/16, Commission v. Council) on two actions of annulment brought by the Commission against Council decisions approving the submission to the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources ("the CCAMLR") of a reflection paper and a common position on four proposals concerning the creation and study of marine protected areas. The point concerned was the question of on behalf of whom the paper and the positions at issue could be submitted: the Union alone or the Union together with its Member States? Although it had no echo on the doctrinal level, the orientation assumed from the Court does introduce important elements, in particular in relation to the EU institutional framework as well as to the balance between Member States and the Union in terms of external action. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Susanna Villani |
author_facet |
Susanna Villani |
author_sort |
Susanna Villani |
title |
Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri? |
title_short |
Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri? |
title_full |
Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri? |
title_fullStr |
Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Riflessioni a margine della sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso AMP Antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli Stati membri? |
title_sort |
riflessioni a margine della sentenza della corte di giustizia nel caso amp antarctica: un approccio più morbido a favore degli stati membri? |
publisher |
European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/308 https://doaj.org/article/4a43d67ae2ed4e38bf5aca257e2a052e |
geographic |
Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Antarctique* |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Antarctique* |
op_source |
European Papers, Vol 2019 4, Iss 2, Pp 641-653 (2019) |
op_relation |
https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/riflessioni-a-margine-di-sentenza-di-corte-di-giustizia-in-amp-antarctica https://doaj.org/toc/2499-8249 2499-8249 doi:10.15166/2499-8249/308 https://doaj.org/article/4a43d67ae2ed4e38bf5aca257e2a052e |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/308 |
_version_ |
1766267176384200704 |