A linear model to derive melt pond depth on Arctic sea ice from hyperspectral data

Melt ponds are key elements in the energy balance of Arctic sea ice. Observing their temporal evolution is crucial for understanding melt processes and predicting sea ice evolution. Remote sensing is the only technique that enables large-scale observations of Arctic sea ice. However, monitoring melt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: M. König, N. Oppelt
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2567-2020
https://doaj.org/article/49d417fc272b4f61b4268a6bba87e6a0
Description
Summary:Melt ponds are key elements in the energy balance of Arctic sea ice. Observing their temporal evolution is crucial for understanding melt processes and predicting sea ice evolution. Remote sensing is the only technique that enables large-scale observations of Arctic sea ice. However, monitoring melt pond deepening in this way is challenging because most of the optical signal reflected by a pond is defined by the scattering characteristics of the underlying ice. Without knowing the influence of meltwater on the reflected signal, the water depth cannot be determined. To solve the problem, we simulated the way meltwater changes the reflected spectra of bare ice. We developed a model based on the slope of the log-scaled remote sensing reflectance at 710 nm as a function of depth that is widely independent from the bottom albedo and accounts for the influence of varying solar zenith angles. We validated the model using 49 in situ melt pond spectra and corresponding depths from shallow ponds on dark and bright ice. Retrieved pond depths are accurate (root mean square error, RMSE=2.81 cm n RMSE=16 %) and highly correlated with in situ measurements ( r =0.89 <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">4.34</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn mathvariant="normal">10</mn><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">17</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math> <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="81pt" height="15pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="e889bc451f3575818ff1fb9c7014edd0"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="tc-14-2567-2020-ie00001.svg" width="81pt" height="15pt" src="tc-14-2567-2020-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg> ). The model further explains a large portion of the variation in pond depth ( R 2 =0.74 ). Our results ...