Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border

This article examines the manner in which the often-mentioned barrier effect of the Finnish-Russian border as well as the greater interaction, enabled by the gradual opening of the border, is perceived among actors involved in cross-border co-operation or border management. The discussion surroundin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jussi Laine
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Geographical Society of Finland 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/47bd830573494c22b9ddba1f9d650a45
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:47bd830573494c22b9ddba1f9d650a45
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:47bd830573494c22b9ddba1f9d650a45 2023-05-15T17:00:18+02:00 Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border Jussi Laine 2007-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/47bd830573494c22b9ddba1f9d650a45 EN eng Geographical Society of Finland https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/3720 https://doaj.org/toc/1798-5617 1798-5617 https://doaj.org/article/47bd830573494c22b9ddba1f9d650a45 Fennia: International Journal of Geography, Vol 185, Iss 1 (2007) Geography (General) G1-922 article 2007 ftdoajarticles 2022-12-31T04:13:47Z This article examines the manner in which the often-mentioned barrier effect of the Finnish-Russian border as well as the greater interaction, enabled by the gradual opening of the border, is perceived among actors involved in cross-border co-operation or border management. The discussion surrounding the impacts of borders on the areas they divide provides the analytical basis on which this article is built. It is a composition of several proposals, which taken together suggest that, first and foremost, borders are barriers for interaction, which have several different roles, some of which are more resistant to change. The empirical data consists of 81 questionnaires, originally collected for the EXLINEA research project from North and South Karelia, in Finland and in the Republic of Karelia and the Leningrad Oblast in Russia. The basic assertion of this article is that despite the benefits gained from its partial opening, the Finnish-Russian border and its side-effects still function as a barrier, separating the two sides from each other and hindering interaction. Given the role that the border plays this is not, however, a purely negative thing. A majority on both sides perceives the border as a necessary and useful institution that is sufficiently transparent to enable the two neighbours to interact in a mutually beneficial manner. Article in Journal/Newspaper karelia* karelia* Republic of Karelia Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Geography (General)
G1-922
spellingShingle Geography (General)
G1-922
Jussi Laine
Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border
topic_facet Geography (General)
G1-922
description This article examines the manner in which the often-mentioned barrier effect of the Finnish-Russian border as well as the greater interaction, enabled by the gradual opening of the border, is perceived among actors involved in cross-border co-operation or border management. The discussion surrounding the impacts of borders on the areas they divide provides the analytical basis on which this article is built. It is a composition of several proposals, which taken together suggest that, first and foremost, borders are barriers for interaction, which have several different roles, some of which are more resistant to change. The empirical data consists of 81 questionnaires, originally collected for the EXLINEA research project from North and South Karelia, in Finland and in the Republic of Karelia and the Leningrad Oblast in Russia. The basic assertion of this article is that despite the benefits gained from its partial opening, the Finnish-Russian border and its side-effects still function as a barrier, separating the two sides from each other and hindering interaction. Given the role that the border plays this is not, however, a purely negative thing. A majority on both sides perceives the border as a necessary and useful institution that is sufficiently transparent to enable the two neighbours to interact in a mutually beneficial manner.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jussi Laine
author_facet Jussi Laine
author_sort Jussi Laine
title Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border
title_short Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border
title_full Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border
title_fullStr Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border
title_full_unstemmed Incommodious border? Rethinking the function of the Finnish- Russian border
title_sort incommodious border? rethinking the function of the finnish- russian border
publisher Geographical Society of Finland
publishDate 2007
url https://doaj.org/article/47bd830573494c22b9ddba1f9d650a45
genre karelia*
karelia*
Republic of Karelia
genre_facet karelia*
karelia*
Republic of Karelia
op_source Fennia: International Journal of Geography, Vol 185, Iss 1 (2007)
op_relation https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/3720
https://doaj.org/toc/1798-5617
1798-5617
https://doaj.org/article/47bd830573494c22b9ddba1f9d650a45
_version_ 1766052956920086528