Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research

The development of evidence-based international strategies for the conservation and management of Arctic ecosystems in the face of climate change is hindered by critical knowledge gaps in Arctic floristic diversity and evolution. Particularly poorly studied are the bryophytes, which dominate the veg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Science
Main Authors: Lily R. Lewis, Stefanie M. Ickert-Bond, Elisabeth M. Biersma, Peter Convey, Bernard Goffinet, Kristian Hassel, Hans (J.D.) Kruijer, Catherine La Farge, Jordan Metzgar, Michael Stech, Juan Carlos Villarreal, Stuart F. McDaniel
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
French
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0043
https://doaj.org/article/465f1b46da3b4eb69b0418a19470af30
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:465f1b46da3b4eb69b0418a19470af30
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:465f1b46da3b4eb69b0418a19470af30 2023-05-15T14:23:40+02:00 Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research Lily R. Lewis Stefanie M. Ickert-Bond Elisabeth M. Biersma Peter Convey Bernard Goffinet Kristian Hassel Hans (J.D.) Kruijer Catherine La Farge Jordan Metzgar Michael Stech Juan Carlos Villarreal Stuart F. McDaniel 2017-06-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0043 https://doaj.org/article/465f1b46da3b4eb69b0418a19470af30 EN FR eng fre Canadian Science Publishing https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0043 https://doaj.org/toc/2368-7460 doi:10.1139/as-2016-0043 2368-7460 https://doaj.org/article/465f1b46da3b4eb69b0418a19470af30 Arctic Science, Vol 3, Iss 3, Pp 475-497 (2017) biodiversity dispersal local adaptation microbiome phylogeography Environmental sciences GE1-350 Environmental engineering TA170-171 article 2017 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0043 2022-12-31T07:38:27Z The development of evidence-based international strategies for the conservation and management of Arctic ecosystems in the face of climate change is hindered by critical knowledge gaps in Arctic floristic diversity and evolution. Particularly poorly studied are the bryophytes, which dominate the vegetation across vast areas of the Arctic and consequently play an important role in global biogeochemical cycles. Currently, much of what is known about Arctic floristic evolution is based on studies of vascular plants. Bryophytes, however, possess a number of features, such as poikilohydry, totipotency, several reproductive strategies, and the ability to disperse through microscopic diaspores, that may cause their responses to Arctic environments to differ from those of the vascular plants. Here we discuss several priority areas identified in the Arctic Council’s “Arctic Biodiversity Assessment” that are necessary to illuminate patterns of Arctic bryophyte evolution and diversity, including dispersal, glacial refugia, local adaptation, and ecological interactions with bryophyte-associated microbiomes. A survey of digitally available herbarium data archived in the largest online aggregate, GBIF, across the Arctic to boreal zones indicates that sampling coverage of mosses is heterogeneous and relatively sparse in the Arctic sensu stricto. A coordinated international effort across the Arctic will be necessary to address knowledge gaps in Arctic bryophyte diversity and evolution in the context of ongoing climate change. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic biodiversity Arctic Climate change Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Arctic Science 3 3 475 497
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
French
topic biodiversity
dispersal
local adaptation
microbiome
phylogeography
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Environmental engineering
TA170-171
spellingShingle biodiversity
dispersal
local adaptation
microbiome
phylogeography
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Environmental engineering
TA170-171
Lily R. Lewis
Stefanie M. Ickert-Bond
Elisabeth M. Biersma
Peter Convey
Bernard Goffinet
Kristian Hassel
Hans (J.D.) Kruijer
Catherine La Farge
Jordan Metzgar
Michael Stech
Juan Carlos Villarreal
Stuart F. McDaniel
Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research
topic_facet biodiversity
dispersal
local adaptation
microbiome
phylogeography
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Environmental engineering
TA170-171
description The development of evidence-based international strategies for the conservation and management of Arctic ecosystems in the face of climate change is hindered by critical knowledge gaps in Arctic floristic diversity and evolution. Particularly poorly studied are the bryophytes, which dominate the vegetation across vast areas of the Arctic and consequently play an important role in global biogeochemical cycles. Currently, much of what is known about Arctic floristic evolution is based on studies of vascular plants. Bryophytes, however, possess a number of features, such as poikilohydry, totipotency, several reproductive strategies, and the ability to disperse through microscopic diaspores, that may cause their responses to Arctic environments to differ from those of the vascular plants. Here we discuss several priority areas identified in the Arctic Council’s “Arctic Biodiversity Assessment” that are necessary to illuminate patterns of Arctic bryophyte evolution and diversity, including dispersal, glacial refugia, local adaptation, and ecological interactions with bryophyte-associated microbiomes. A survey of digitally available herbarium data archived in the largest online aggregate, GBIF, across the Arctic to boreal zones indicates that sampling coverage of mosses is heterogeneous and relatively sparse in the Arctic sensu stricto. A coordinated international effort across the Arctic will be necessary to address knowledge gaps in Arctic bryophyte diversity and evolution in the context of ongoing climate change.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lily R. Lewis
Stefanie M. Ickert-Bond
Elisabeth M. Biersma
Peter Convey
Bernard Goffinet
Kristian Hassel
Hans (J.D.) Kruijer
Catherine La Farge
Jordan Metzgar
Michael Stech
Juan Carlos Villarreal
Stuart F. McDaniel
author_facet Lily R. Lewis
Stefanie M. Ickert-Bond
Elisabeth M. Biersma
Peter Convey
Bernard Goffinet
Kristian Hassel
Hans (J.D.) Kruijer
Catherine La Farge
Jordan Metzgar
Michael Stech
Juan Carlos Villarreal
Stuart F. McDaniel
author_sort Lily R. Lewis
title Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research
title_short Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research
title_full Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research
title_fullStr Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research
title_full_unstemmed Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research
title_sort future directions and priorities for arctic bryophyte research
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0043
https://doaj.org/article/465f1b46da3b4eb69b0418a19470af30
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Arctic biodiversity
Arctic
Climate change
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic biodiversity
Arctic
Climate change
op_source Arctic Science, Vol 3, Iss 3, Pp 475-497 (2017)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0043
https://doaj.org/toc/2368-7460
doi:10.1139/as-2016-0043
2368-7460
https://doaj.org/article/465f1b46da3b4eb69b0418a19470af30
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0043
container_title Arctic Science
container_volume 3
container_issue 3
container_start_page 475
op_container_end_page 497
_version_ 1766296162155888640