Movement patterns of a commercially important, free-ranging marine invertebrate in the vicinity of a bait source

Abstract Background Catch per unit effort is a cost-effective index of abundance and fishing effort, and an integral part of many fisheries stock assessments. Trap fisheries data are often generated using non-standardised methodology and the information to improve the accuracy of estimates is not al...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal Biotelemetry
Main Authors: Kirsty J. Lees, Aileen C. Mill, Daniel J. Skerritt, Peter A. Robertson, Clare Fitzsimmons
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-018-0152-4
https://doaj.org/article/463124a5550c4ac2873e04170caff509
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:463124a5550c4ac2873e04170caff509
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:463124a5550c4ac2873e04170caff509 2023-05-15T16:08:48+02:00 Movement patterns of a commercially important, free-ranging marine invertebrate in the vicinity of a bait source Kirsty J. Lees Aileen C. Mill Daniel J. Skerritt Peter A. Robertson Clare Fitzsimmons 2018-06-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-018-0152-4 https://doaj.org/article/463124a5550c4ac2873e04170caff509 EN eng BMC http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40317-018-0152-4 https://doaj.org/toc/2050-3385 doi:10.1186/s40317-018-0152-4 2050-3385 https://doaj.org/article/463124a5550c4ac2873e04170caff509 Animal Biotelemetry, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2018) European lobster H. gammarus Fisheries Acoustic telemetry Pot-fishing Bait attraction Ecology QH540-549.5 Animal biochemistry QP501-801 article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-018-0152-4 2022-12-31T06:35:17Z Abstract Background Catch per unit effort is a cost-effective index of abundance and fishing effort, and an integral part of many fisheries stock assessments. Trap fisheries data are often generated using non-standardised methodology and the information to improve the accuracy of estimates is not always available due to current ecological knowledge gaps. Despite its economic importance, the European lobster Homarus gammarus has been relatively understudied compared to the closely related H. americanus. Previous studies investigating behaviour of Homarus spp. in relation to bait sources have been undertaken in aquariums or mesocosms rather than on free-ranging lobsters in the field. This study uses fine-scale acoustic telemetry data, and a null model approach to investigate free-ranging H. gammarus behaviour and movement in relation to baited commercial traps. Results The distribution of lobsters $${\textit{n}} = 11$$ n=11 was largely similar in the presence and absence of traps. The time spent within 20 m of a trap ranged from 3 min to 16 h 55 min ($${\textit{n}} = 27$$ n=27 ), and the distance at which lobsters began approaching a trap varied considerably (5.40 m to 125 m, $${\textit{n}} = 22$$ n=22 ); the mean distances were larger than calculated by previous studies. A fifth of trap approaches resulted in movement against the current indicating a potential olfactory response to a bait plume. A pre-existing non-random association with a trap location may increase the time spent near the trap and reduce the minimum distance between the lobster and the trap. Conclusions This is the first study to assess the movement patterns of free-ranging H. gammarus in relation to a bait source. The larger approach distances in this study were likely due to the unrestricted ranging behaviour of the tagged lobsters. Aquarium and mesocosm studies provide greater experimental control, but may restrict movement and underestimate the area of bait influence. The use of null models to infer movement patterns of free-ranging lobsters ... Article in Journal/Newspaper European lobster Homarus gammarus Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Animal Biotelemetry 6 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic European lobster
H. gammarus
Fisheries
Acoustic telemetry
Pot-fishing
Bait attraction
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Animal biochemistry
QP501-801
spellingShingle European lobster
H. gammarus
Fisheries
Acoustic telemetry
Pot-fishing
Bait attraction
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Animal biochemistry
QP501-801
Kirsty J. Lees
Aileen C. Mill
Daniel J. Skerritt
Peter A. Robertson
Clare Fitzsimmons
Movement patterns of a commercially important, free-ranging marine invertebrate in the vicinity of a bait source
topic_facet European lobster
H. gammarus
Fisheries
Acoustic telemetry
Pot-fishing
Bait attraction
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Animal biochemistry
QP501-801
description Abstract Background Catch per unit effort is a cost-effective index of abundance and fishing effort, and an integral part of many fisheries stock assessments. Trap fisheries data are often generated using non-standardised methodology and the information to improve the accuracy of estimates is not always available due to current ecological knowledge gaps. Despite its economic importance, the European lobster Homarus gammarus has been relatively understudied compared to the closely related H. americanus. Previous studies investigating behaviour of Homarus spp. in relation to bait sources have been undertaken in aquariums or mesocosms rather than on free-ranging lobsters in the field. This study uses fine-scale acoustic telemetry data, and a null model approach to investigate free-ranging H. gammarus behaviour and movement in relation to baited commercial traps. Results The distribution of lobsters $${\textit{n}} = 11$$ n=11 was largely similar in the presence and absence of traps. The time spent within 20 m of a trap ranged from 3 min to 16 h 55 min ($${\textit{n}} = 27$$ n=27 ), and the distance at which lobsters began approaching a trap varied considerably (5.40 m to 125 m, $${\textit{n}} = 22$$ n=22 ); the mean distances were larger than calculated by previous studies. A fifth of trap approaches resulted in movement against the current indicating a potential olfactory response to a bait plume. A pre-existing non-random association with a trap location may increase the time spent near the trap and reduce the minimum distance between the lobster and the trap. Conclusions This is the first study to assess the movement patterns of free-ranging H. gammarus in relation to a bait source. The larger approach distances in this study were likely due to the unrestricted ranging behaviour of the tagged lobsters. Aquarium and mesocosm studies provide greater experimental control, but may restrict movement and underestimate the area of bait influence. The use of null models to infer movement patterns of free-ranging lobsters ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kirsty J. Lees
Aileen C. Mill
Daniel J. Skerritt
Peter A. Robertson
Clare Fitzsimmons
author_facet Kirsty J. Lees
Aileen C. Mill
Daniel J. Skerritt
Peter A. Robertson
Clare Fitzsimmons
author_sort Kirsty J. Lees
title Movement patterns of a commercially important, free-ranging marine invertebrate in the vicinity of a bait source
title_short Movement patterns of a commercially important, free-ranging marine invertebrate in the vicinity of a bait source
title_full Movement patterns of a commercially important, free-ranging marine invertebrate in the vicinity of a bait source
title_fullStr Movement patterns of a commercially important, free-ranging marine invertebrate in the vicinity of a bait source
title_full_unstemmed Movement patterns of a commercially important, free-ranging marine invertebrate in the vicinity of a bait source
title_sort movement patterns of a commercially important, free-ranging marine invertebrate in the vicinity of a bait source
publisher BMC
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-018-0152-4
https://doaj.org/article/463124a5550c4ac2873e04170caff509
genre European lobster
Homarus gammarus
genre_facet European lobster
Homarus gammarus
op_source Animal Biotelemetry, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2018)
op_relation http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40317-018-0152-4
https://doaj.org/toc/2050-3385
doi:10.1186/s40317-018-0152-4
2050-3385
https://doaj.org/article/463124a5550c4ac2873e04170caff509
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-018-0152-4
container_title Animal Biotelemetry
container_volume 6
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766404813695746048