Range shifts in a foundation sedge potentially induce large Arctic ecosystem carbon losses and gains

Foundation species have disproportionately large impacts on ecosystem structure and function. As a result, future changes to their distribution may be important determinants of ecosystem carbon (C) cycling in a warmer world. We assessed the role of a foundation tussock sedge ( Eriophorum vaginatum )...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Research Letters
Main Authors: Salvatore R Curasi, Ned Fetcher, Rebecca E Hewitt, Peter M Lafleur, Michael M Loranty, Michelle C Mack, Jeremy L May, Isla H Myers-Smith, Susan M Natali, Steven F Oberbauer, Thomas C Parker, Oliver Sonnentag, Sergio A Vargas Zesati, Stan D Wullschleger, Adrian V Rocha
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2022
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac6005
https://doaj.org/article/45804bdfe0f548b2a1fb3c53c880c967
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:45804bdfe0f548b2a1fb3c53c880c967
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:45804bdfe0f548b2a1fb3c53c880c967 2023-09-05T13:16:55+02:00 Range shifts in a foundation sedge potentially induce large Arctic ecosystem carbon losses and gains Salvatore R Curasi Ned Fetcher Rebecca E Hewitt Peter M Lafleur Michael M Loranty Michelle C Mack Jeremy L May Isla H Myers-Smith Susan M Natali Steven F Oberbauer Thomas C Parker Oliver Sonnentag Sergio A Vargas Zesati Stan D Wullschleger Adrian V Rocha 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac6005 https://doaj.org/article/45804bdfe0f548b2a1fb3c53c880c967 EN eng IOP Publishing https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac6005 https://doaj.org/toc/1748-9326 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac6005 1748-9326 https://doaj.org/article/45804bdfe0f548b2a1fb3c53c880c967 Environmental Research Letters, Vol 17, Iss 4, p 045024 (2022) Arctic tundra carbon cycle climate change Eriophorum vaginatum carbon stocks Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Science Q Physics QC1-999 article 2022 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac6005 2023-08-13T00:36:42Z Foundation species have disproportionately large impacts on ecosystem structure and function. As a result, future changes to their distribution may be important determinants of ecosystem carbon (C) cycling in a warmer world. We assessed the role of a foundation tussock sedge ( Eriophorum vaginatum ) as a climatically vulnerable C stock using field data, a machine learning ecological niche model, and an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs). Field data indicated that tussock density has decreased by ∼0.97 tussocks per m ^2 over the past ∼38 years on Alaska’s North Slope from ∼1981 to 2019. This declining trend is concerning because tussocks are a large Arctic C stock, which enhances soil organic layer C stocks by 6.9% on average and represents 745 Tg C across our study area. By 2100, we project that changes in tussock density may decrease the tussock C stock by 41% in regions where tussocks are currently abundant (e.g. −0.8 tussocks per m ^2 and −85 Tg C on the North Slope) and may increase the tussock C stock by 46% in regions where tussocks are currently scarce (e.g. +0.9 tussocks per m ^2 and +81 Tg C on Victoria Island). These climate-induced changes to the tussock C stock were comparable to, but sometimes opposite in sign, to vegetation C stock changes predicted by an ensemble of TBMs. Our results illustrate the important role of tussocks as a foundation species in determining future Arctic C stocks and highlight the need for better representation of this species in TBMs. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Climate change Eriophorum Tundra Victoria Island Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Environmental Research Letters 17 4 045024
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Arctic
tundra
carbon cycle
climate change
Eriophorum vaginatum
carbon stocks
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle Arctic
tundra
carbon cycle
climate change
Eriophorum vaginatum
carbon stocks
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
Salvatore R Curasi
Ned Fetcher
Rebecca E Hewitt
Peter M Lafleur
Michael M Loranty
Michelle C Mack
Jeremy L May
Isla H Myers-Smith
Susan M Natali
Steven F Oberbauer
Thomas C Parker
Oliver Sonnentag
Sergio A Vargas Zesati
Stan D Wullschleger
Adrian V Rocha
Range shifts in a foundation sedge potentially induce large Arctic ecosystem carbon losses and gains
topic_facet Arctic
tundra
carbon cycle
climate change
Eriophorum vaginatum
carbon stocks
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
description Foundation species have disproportionately large impacts on ecosystem structure and function. As a result, future changes to their distribution may be important determinants of ecosystem carbon (C) cycling in a warmer world. We assessed the role of a foundation tussock sedge ( Eriophorum vaginatum ) as a climatically vulnerable C stock using field data, a machine learning ecological niche model, and an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs). Field data indicated that tussock density has decreased by ∼0.97 tussocks per m ^2 over the past ∼38 years on Alaska’s North Slope from ∼1981 to 2019. This declining trend is concerning because tussocks are a large Arctic C stock, which enhances soil organic layer C stocks by 6.9% on average and represents 745 Tg C across our study area. By 2100, we project that changes in tussock density may decrease the tussock C stock by 41% in regions where tussocks are currently abundant (e.g. −0.8 tussocks per m ^2 and −85 Tg C on the North Slope) and may increase the tussock C stock by 46% in regions where tussocks are currently scarce (e.g. +0.9 tussocks per m ^2 and +81 Tg C on Victoria Island). These climate-induced changes to the tussock C stock were comparable to, but sometimes opposite in sign, to vegetation C stock changes predicted by an ensemble of TBMs. Our results illustrate the important role of tussocks as a foundation species in determining future Arctic C stocks and highlight the need for better representation of this species in TBMs.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Salvatore R Curasi
Ned Fetcher
Rebecca E Hewitt
Peter M Lafleur
Michael M Loranty
Michelle C Mack
Jeremy L May
Isla H Myers-Smith
Susan M Natali
Steven F Oberbauer
Thomas C Parker
Oliver Sonnentag
Sergio A Vargas Zesati
Stan D Wullschleger
Adrian V Rocha
author_facet Salvatore R Curasi
Ned Fetcher
Rebecca E Hewitt
Peter M Lafleur
Michael M Loranty
Michelle C Mack
Jeremy L May
Isla H Myers-Smith
Susan M Natali
Steven F Oberbauer
Thomas C Parker
Oliver Sonnentag
Sergio A Vargas Zesati
Stan D Wullschleger
Adrian V Rocha
author_sort Salvatore R Curasi
title Range shifts in a foundation sedge potentially induce large Arctic ecosystem carbon losses and gains
title_short Range shifts in a foundation sedge potentially induce large Arctic ecosystem carbon losses and gains
title_full Range shifts in a foundation sedge potentially induce large Arctic ecosystem carbon losses and gains
title_fullStr Range shifts in a foundation sedge potentially induce large Arctic ecosystem carbon losses and gains
title_full_unstemmed Range shifts in a foundation sedge potentially induce large Arctic ecosystem carbon losses and gains
title_sort range shifts in a foundation sedge potentially induce large arctic ecosystem carbon losses and gains
publisher IOP Publishing
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac6005
https://doaj.org/article/45804bdfe0f548b2a1fb3c53c880c967
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
Eriophorum
Tundra
Victoria Island
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
Eriophorum
Tundra
Victoria Island
op_source Environmental Research Letters, Vol 17, Iss 4, p 045024 (2022)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac6005
https://doaj.org/toc/1748-9326
doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac6005
1748-9326
https://doaj.org/article/45804bdfe0f548b2a1fb3c53c880c967
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac6005
container_title Environmental Research Letters
container_volume 17
container_issue 4
container_start_page 045024
_version_ 1776198326049308672