Ecology of the Porcupine caribou herd

Researchers have described general patterns of population regulation that fit most caribou (Rangifer tarandus) herds. Nevertheless, specific factors operating on particular populations vary greatly, and efforts to categorize herds according to the general patterns often lead to confusion. It is diff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rangifer
Main Author: Kenneth R. Whitten
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Septentrio Academic Publishing 1996
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7557/2.16.4.1220
https://doaj.org/article/44021a8a5e65431da029c42cb1553715
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:44021a8a5e65431da029c42cb1553715
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:44021a8a5e65431da029c42cb1553715 2023-05-15T15:10:01+02:00 Ecology of the Porcupine caribou herd Kenneth R. Whitten 1996-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.7557/2.16.4.1220 https://doaj.org/article/44021a8a5e65431da029c42cb1553715 EN eng Septentrio Academic Publishing https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1220 https://doaj.org/toc/1890-6729 doi:10.7557/2.16.4.1220 1890-6729 https://doaj.org/article/44021a8a5e65431da029c42cb1553715 Rangifer, Vol 16, Iss 4 (1996) Porcupine caribou density limitation population dynamics regulation Animal culture SF1-1100 article 1996 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.7557/2.16.4.1220 2022-12-31T09:37:36Z Researchers have described general patterns of population regulation that fit most caribou (Rangifer tarandus) herds. Nevertheless, specific factors operating on particular populations vary greatly, and efforts to categorize herds according to the general patterns often lead to confusion. It is difficult for biologists to attempt to describe population dynamics in terms of density relationships for wide-ranging arctic caribou such as the Porcupine Herd. In these herds density varies as a function of dispersal and erratic movement patterns and is not simply the number of caribou divided by a fixed range area. Density is also a poor surrogate for resource availability per individual caribou because climatic factors affect forage and/or access to forage independendy of caribou numbers. Thus classic signs of nutritional stress such as delayed puberty, reduced productivity, and winter starvation can occur when a population is small as well as large and do not necessarily denote food competition brought on by high density, per se. Nutritional stress and exacerbated predation due to adverse weather conditions occasionally cause the Porcupine Herd to decline, and limiting factors such as poor nutrition, predation, harvest, accidents, and disease act in combination to keep herd growth rates low during periods of good weather. Adverse weather setbacks occur frequently, and the herd remains within a fairly restricted range of densities over long time periods. There is no true density dependent regulation and no equilibrium in this system. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic caribou Rangifer Rangifer tarandus Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Rangifer 16 4 45
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Porcupine
caribou
density
limitation
population dynamics
regulation
Animal culture
SF1-1100
spellingShingle Porcupine
caribou
density
limitation
population dynamics
regulation
Animal culture
SF1-1100
Kenneth R. Whitten
Ecology of the Porcupine caribou herd
topic_facet Porcupine
caribou
density
limitation
population dynamics
regulation
Animal culture
SF1-1100
description Researchers have described general patterns of population regulation that fit most caribou (Rangifer tarandus) herds. Nevertheless, specific factors operating on particular populations vary greatly, and efforts to categorize herds according to the general patterns often lead to confusion. It is difficult for biologists to attempt to describe population dynamics in terms of density relationships for wide-ranging arctic caribou such as the Porcupine Herd. In these herds density varies as a function of dispersal and erratic movement patterns and is not simply the number of caribou divided by a fixed range area. Density is also a poor surrogate for resource availability per individual caribou because climatic factors affect forage and/or access to forage independendy of caribou numbers. Thus classic signs of nutritional stress such as delayed puberty, reduced productivity, and winter starvation can occur when a population is small as well as large and do not necessarily denote food competition brought on by high density, per se. Nutritional stress and exacerbated predation due to adverse weather conditions occasionally cause the Porcupine Herd to decline, and limiting factors such as poor nutrition, predation, harvest, accidents, and disease act in combination to keep herd growth rates low during periods of good weather. Adverse weather setbacks occur frequently, and the herd remains within a fairly restricted range of densities over long time periods. There is no true density dependent regulation and no equilibrium in this system.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kenneth R. Whitten
author_facet Kenneth R. Whitten
author_sort Kenneth R. Whitten
title Ecology of the Porcupine caribou herd
title_short Ecology of the Porcupine caribou herd
title_full Ecology of the Porcupine caribou herd
title_fullStr Ecology of the Porcupine caribou herd
title_full_unstemmed Ecology of the Porcupine caribou herd
title_sort ecology of the porcupine caribou herd
publisher Septentrio Academic Publishing
publishDate 1996
url https://doi.org/10.7557/2.16.4.1220
https://doaj.org/article/44021a8a5e65431da029c42cb1553715
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
caribou
Rangifer
Rangifer tarandus
genre_facet Arctic
caribou
Rangifer
Rangifer tarandus
op_source Rangifer, Vol 16, Iss 4 (1996)
op_relation https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1220
https://doaj.org/toc/1890-6729
doi:10.7557/2.16.4.1220
1890-6729
https://doaj.org/article/44021a8a5e65431da029c42cb1553715
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7557/2.16.4.1220
container_title Rangifer
container_volume 16
container_issue 4
container_start_page 45
_version_ 1766341097022291968