Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II

Iceland — an independent republic — and Greenland — an autonomous country within Denmark — represent two nations with similar geographical, economic, and historical backgrounds. Isolated from the continents, both are significantly affected by an adverse climate, making their economies dependent on t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic and North
Main Author: Aliaksei PATONIA
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Russian
Published: Northern Arctic Federal University 2021
Subjects:
H
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.42.242
https://doaj.org/article/401e5b44381545daabba24dc97f7e143
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:401e5b44381545daabba24dc97f7e143
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:401e5b44381545daabba24dc97f7e143 2023-05-15T16:24:05+02:00 Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II Aliaksei PATONIA 2021-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.42.242 https://doaj.org/article/401e5b44381545daabba24dc97f7e143 EN RU eng rus Northern Arctic Federal University http://www.arcticandnorth.ru/en/article_index_years.php?ELEMENT_ID=354262 https://doaj.org/toc/2221-2698 doi:10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.42.242 2221-2698 https://doaj.org/article/401e5b44381545daabba24dc97f7e143 Арктика и Север, Vol 42, Iss 42, Pp 207-218 (2021) iceland greenland renewable energy social capital geography institution culture Social Sciences H article 2021 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.42.242 2022-12-31T09:42:38Z Iceland — an independent republic — and Greenland — an autonomous country within Denmark — represent two nations with similar geographical, economic, and historical backgrounds. Isolated from the continents, both are significantly affected by an adverse climate, making their economies dependent on trade and import. Nevertheless, despite their similarities, their national energy patterns differ substantially. Specifically, Iceland covers most of its energy mix with local renewables, whereas Greenland meets most of the energy demand with imported hydrocarbons. This paper investigates the reasons for Greenland lagging behind Iceland in terms of developing renewable energy resources. It hypothesises that, apart from the commonly-mentioned geographical, institutional, and cultural factors, the difference in social capital level has significantly contributed to the countries’ divergent energy strategies. In this sense, Iceland’s higher social capital stock stimulates its renewable power progress, whereas Greenland’s lower social capital level hampers it. To examine this hypothesis, the article constructs a ‘social capital tripod’, which assumes specific geographical, institutional, and cultural factors to be linked to renewable energy development through social capital. The findings demonstrate that Greenland, being dependent on hydrocarbon import, has a significantly lower expected level of social capital than Iceland, which runs mostly on renewables, therefore generally aligning with the research hypothesis. Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Greenland Arctic and North 42 242 256
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
Russian
topic iceland
greenland
renewable energy
social capital
geography
institution
culture
Social Sciences
H
spellingShingle iceland
greenland
renewable energy
social capital
geography
institution
culture
Social Sciences
H
Aliaksei PATONIA
Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II
topic_facet iceland
greenland
renewable energy
social capital
geography
institution
culture
Social Sciences
H
description Iceland — an independent republic — and Greenland — an autonomous country within Denmark — represent two nations with similar geographical, economic, and historical backgrounds. Isolated from the continents, both are significantly affected by an adverse climate, making their economies dependent on trade and import. Nevertheless, despite their similarities, their national energy patterns differ substantially. Specifically, Iceland covers most of its energy mix with local renewables, whereas Greenland meets most of the energy demand with imported hydrocarbons. This paper investigates the reasons for Greenland lagging behind Iceland in terms of developing renewable energy resources. It hypothesises that, apart from the commonly-mentioned geographical, institutional, and cultural factors, the difference in social capital level has significantly contributed to the countries’ divergent energy strategies. In this sense, Iceland’s higher social capital stock stimulates its renewable power progress, whereas Greenland’s lower social capital level hampers it. To examine this hypothesis, the article constructs a ‘social capital tripod’, which assumes specific geographical, institutional, and cultural factors to be linked to renewable energy development through social capital. The findings demonstrate that Greenland, being dependent on hydrocarbon import, has a significantly lower expected level of social capital than Iceland, which runs mostly on renewables, therefore generally aligning with the research hypothesis.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Aliaksei PATONIA
author_facet Aliaksei PATONIA
author_sort Aliaksei PATONIA
title Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II
title_short Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II
title_full Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II
title_fullStr Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II
title_full_unstemmed Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II
title_sort trust in ultima thules: social capital and renewable energy development in iceland and greenland. part ii
publisher Northern Arctic Federal University
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.42.242
https://doaj.org/article/401e5b44381545daabba24dc97f7e143
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
Iceland
genre_facet Greenland
Iceland
op_source Арктика и Север, Vol 42, Iss 42, Pp 207-218 (2021)
op_relation http://www.arcticandnorth.ru/en/article_index_years.php?ELEMENT_ID=354262
https://doaj.org/toc/2221-2698
doi:10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.42.242
2221-2698
https://doaj.org/article/401e5b44381545daabba24dc97f7e143
op_doi https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.42.242
container_title Arctic and North
container_issue 42
container_start_page 242
op_container_end_page 256
_version_ 1766012474933379072