Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II
Iceland — an independent republic — and Greenland — an autonomous country within Denmark — represent two nations with similar geographical, economic, and historical backgrounds. Isolated from the continents, both are significantly affected by an adverse climate, making their economies dependent on t...
Published in: | Arctic and North |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English Russian |
Published: |
Northern Arctic Federal University
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.42.242 https://doaj.org/article/401e5b44381545daabba24dc97f7e143 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:401e5b44381545daabba24dc97f7e143 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:401e5b44381545daabba24dc97f7e143 2023-05-15T16:24:05+02:00 Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II Aliaksei PATONIA 2021-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.42.242 https://doaj.org/article/401e5b44381545daabba24dc97f7e143 EN RU eng rus Northern Arctic Federal University http://www.arcticandnorth.ru/en/article_index_years.php?ELEMENT_ID=354262 https://doaj.org/toc/2221-2698 doi:10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.42.242 2221-2698 https://doaj.org/article/401e5b44381545daabba24dc97f7e143 Арктика и Север, Vol 42, Iss 42, Pp 207-218 (2021) iceland greenland renewable energy social capital geography institution culture Social Sciences H article 2021 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.42.242 2022-12-31T09:42:38Z Iceland — an independent republic — and Greenland — an autonomous country within Denmark — represent two nations with similar geographical, economic, and historical backgrounds. Isolated from the continents, both are significantly affected by an adverse climate, making their economies dependent on trade and import. Nevertheless, despite their similarities, their national energy patterns differ substantially. Specifically, Iceland covers most of its energy mix with local renewables, whereas Greenland meets most of the energy demand with imported hydrocarbons. This paper investigates the reasons for Greenland lagging behind Iceland in terms of developing renewable energy resources. It hypothesises that, apart from the commonly-mentioned geographical, institutional, and cultural factors, the difference in social capital level has significantly contributed to the countries’ divergent energy strategies. In this sense, Iceland’s higher social capital stock stimulates its renewable power progress, whereas Greenland’s lower social capital level hampers it. To examine this hypothesis, the article constructs a ‘social capital tripod’, which assumes specific geographical, institutional, and cultural factors to be linked to renewable energy development through social capital. The findings demonstrate that Greenland, being dependent on hydrocarbon import, has a significantly lower expected level of social capital than Iceland, which runs mostly on renewables, therefore generally aligning with the research hypothesis. Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Greenland Arctic and North 42 242 256 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English Russian |
topic |
iceland greenland renewable energy social capital geography institution culture Social Sciences H |
spellingShingle |
iceland greenland renewable energy social capital geography institution culture Social Sciences H Aliaksei PATONIA Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II |
topic_facet |
iceland greenland renewable energy social capital geography institution culture Social Sciences H |
description |
Iceland — an independent republic — and Greenland — an autonomous country within Denmark — represent two nations with similar geographical, economic, and historical backgrounds. Isolated from the continents, both are significantly affected by an adverse climate, making their economies dependent on trade and import. Nevertheless, despite their similarities, their national energy patterns differ substantially. Specifically, Iceland covers most of its energy mix with local renewables, whereas Greenland meets most of the energy demand with imported hydrocarbons. This paper investigates the reasons for Greenland lagging behind Iceland in terms of developing renewable energy resources. It hypothesises that, apart from the commonly-mentioned geographical, institutional, and cultural factors, the difference in social capital level has significantly contributed to the countries’ divergent energy strategies. In this sense, Iceland’s higher social capital stock stimulates its renewable power progress, whereas Greenland’s lower social capital level hampers it. To examine this hypothesis, the article constructs a ‘social capital tripod’, which assumes specific geographical, institutional, and cultural factors to be linked to renewable energy development through social capital. The findings demonstrate that Greenland, being dependent on hydrocarbon import, has a significantly lower expected level of social capital than Iceland, which runs mostly on renewables, therefore generally aligning with the research hypothesis. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Aliaksei PATONIA |
author_facet |
Aliaksei PATONIA |
author_sort |
Aliaksei PATONIA |
title |
Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II |
title_short |
Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II |
title_full |
Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II |
title_fullStr |
Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II |
title_full_unstemmed |
Trust in Ultima Thules: Social Capital and Renewable Energy Development in Iceland and Greenland. Part II |
title_sort |
trust in ultima thules: social capital and renewable energy development in iceland and greenland. part ii |
publisher |
Northern Arctic Federal University |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.42.242 https://doaj.org/article/401e5b44381545daabba24dc97f7e143 |
geographic |
Greenland |
geographic_facet |
Greenland |
genre |
Greenland Iceland |
genre_facet |
Greenland Iceland |
op_source |
Арктика и Север, Vol 42, Iss 42, Pp 207-218 (2021) |
op_relation |
http://www.arcticandnorth.ru/en/article_index_years.php?ELEMENT_ID=354262 https://doaj.org/toc/2221-2698 doi:10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.42.242 2221-2698 https://doaj.org/article/401e5b44381545daabba24dc97f7e143 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.42.242 |
container_title |
Arctic and North |
container_issue |
42 |
container_start_page |
242 |
op_container_end_page |
256 |
_version_ |
1766012474933379072 |