Distinguishing between old and modern permafrost sources in the northeast Siberian land–shelf system with compound-specific δ 2 H analysis

• Published in: The Cryosphere
• Main Authors: J. E. Vonk, T. Tesi, L. Bröder, H. Holmstrand, G. Hugelius, A. Andersson, O. Dudarev, I. Semiletov, Ö. Gustafsson
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2017
• Subjects: Environmental sciences; GE1-350; Geology; QE1-996.5; Arctic; Ice; permafrost; The Cryosphere
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1879-2017; https://doaj.org/article/3ff96b288b554ba79376152b8e44e340

Pleistocene ice complex permafrost deposits contain roughly a quarter of the organic carbon (OC) stored in permafrost (PF) terrain. When permafrost thaws, its OC is remobilized into the (aquatic) environment where it is available for degradation, transport or burial. Aquatic or coastal environments contain sedimentary reservoirs that can serve as archives of past climatic change. As permafrost thaw is increasing throughout the Arctic, these reservoirs are important locations to assess the fate of remobilized permafrost OC. We here present compound-specific deuterium ( δ 2 H) analysis on leaf waxes as a tool to distinguish between OC released from thawing Pleistocene permafrost (ice complex deposits; ICD) and from thawing Holocene permafrost (from near-surface soils). Bulk geochemistry (%OC; δ 13 C; %total nitrogen, TN) was analyzed as well as the concentrations and δ 2 H signatures of long-chain n -alkanes (C 21 to C 33 ) and mid- to long-chain n -alkanoic acids (C 16 to C 30 ) extracted from both ICD-PF samples ( n = 9) and modern vegetation and O-horizon (topsoil-PF) samples ( n = 9) from across the northeast Siberian Arctic. Results show that these topsoil-PF samples have higher %OC, higher OC ∕ TN values and more depleted δ 13 C-OC values than ICD-PF samples, suggesting that these former samples trace a fresher soil and/or vegetation source. Whereas the two investigated sources differ on the bulk geochemical level, they are, however, virtually indistinguishable when using leaf wax concentrations and ratios. However, on the molecular isotope level, leaf wax biomarker δ 2 H values are statistically different between topsoil PF and ICD PF. For example, the mean δ 2 H value of C 29 n -alkane was −246 ± 13 ‰ (mean ± SD) for topsoil PF and −280 ± 12 ‰ for ICD PF. With a dynamic isotopic range (difference between two sources) of 34 to 50 ‰; the isotopic fingerprints of individual, abundant, biomarker molecules from leaf waxes can thus serve as endmembers to distinguish between these two sources. We tested this ...