Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelinesfor Chagas disease
INTRODUCTION: The development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) has increased; this study aimed to assess the quality of CPGs for the management of Chagas disease. METHODS: Following a systematic search of the scientific literature, two reviewers assessed the eligible guidelines using the Appra...
| Published in: | Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0251-2014 https://doaj.org/article/3e82c8f3287543c3a65abc4f614e526b |
| Summary: | INTRODUCTION: The development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) has increased; this study aimed to assess the quality of CPGs for the management of Chagas disease. METHODS: Following a systematic search of the scientific literature, two reviewers assessed the eligible guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. RESULTS: Five CPGs were included. The AGREE domains of scope/purpose, stakeholder involvement, and clarity of presentation were rated well, and the domains of applicability and editorial independence received poor ratings. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of CPGs for Chagas disease is poor, and significant work is required to develop high-quality guidelines. |
|---|