Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform

Abstract Background Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have enabled comprehensive analysis of the gut microbiota, which is closely linked to the health of the host. Consequently, several studies have explored the factors affecting gut microbiota composition. In recent years,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gut Pathogens
Main Authors: Junhyung Kim, Jae-Uk An, Woohyun Kim, Soomin Lee, Seongbeom Cho
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-017-0218-5
https://doaj.org/article/3e6701f96cb04c6e9f803f4e9f389a17
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3e6701f96cb04c6e9f803f4e9f389a17
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3e6701f96cb04c6e9f803f4e9f389a17 2023-05-15T15:49:45+02:00 Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform Junhyung Kim Jae-Uk An Woohyun Kim Soomin Lee Seongbeom Cho 2017-11-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-017-0218-5 https://doaj.org/article/3e6701f96cb04c6e9f803f4e9f389a17 EN eng BMC http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13099-017-0218-5 https://doaj.org/toc/1757-4749 doi:10.1186/s13099-017-0218-5 1757-4749 https://doaj.org/article/3e6701f96cb04c6e9f803f4e9f389a17 Gut Pathogens, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017) Canis lupus familiaris Natural diet Next-generation sequencing Gut microbiota Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology RC799-869 article 2017 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-017-0218-5 2022-12-31T05:05:08Z Abstract Background Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have enabled comprehensive analysis of the gut microbiota, which is closely linked to the health of the host. Consequently, several studies have explored the factors affecting gut microbiota composition. In recent years, increasing number of dog owners are feeding their pets a natural diet i.e., one consisting of bones, raw meat (such as chicken and beef), and vegetables, instead of commercial feed. However, the effect of these diets on the microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) is unclear. Methods and results Six dogs fed a natural diet and five dogs fed a commercial feed were selected; dog fecal metagenomic DNA samples were analyzed using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Pronounced differences in alpha and beta diversities, and taxonomic composition of the core gut microbiota were observed between the two groups. According to alpha diversity, the number of operational taxonomic units, the richness estimates, and diversity indices of microbiota were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the natural diet group than in the commercial feed group. Based on beta diversity, most samples clustered together according to the diet type (p = 0.004). Additionally, the core microbiota between the two groups was different at the phylum, family, and species levels. Marked differences in the taxonomic composition of the core microbiota of the two groups were observed at the species level; Clostridium perfringens (p = 0.017) and Fusobacterium varium (p = 0.030) were more abundant in the natural diet group. Conclusions The gut microbiota of dogs is significantly influenced by diet type (i.e., natural diet and commercial feed). Specifically, dogs fed a natural diet have more diverse and abundant microbial composition in the gut microbiota than dogs fed a commercial feed. In addition, this study suggests that in dogs fed a natural diet, the potential risk of opportunistic infection could be higher, than in dogs fed a commercial feed. The type of diet ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Gut Pathogens 9 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Canis lupus familiaris
Natural diet
Next-generation sequencing
Gut microbiota
Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
RC799-869
spellingShingle Canis lupus familiaris
Natural diet
Next-generation sequencing
Gut microbiota
Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
RC799-869
Junhyung Kim
Jae-Uk An
Woohyun Kim
Soomin Lee
Seongbeom Cho
Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform
topic_facet Canis lupus familiaris
Natural diet
Next-generation sequencing
Gut microbiota
Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
RC799-869
description Abstract Background Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have enabled comprehensive analysis of the gut microbiota, which is closely linked to the health of the host. Consequently, several studies have explored the factors affecting gut microbiota composition. In recent years, increasing number of dog owners are feeding their pets a natural diet i.e., one consisting of bones, raw meat (such as chicken and beef), and vegetables, instead of commercial feed. However, the effect of these diets on the microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) is unclear. Methods and results Six dogs fed a natural diet and five dogs fed a commercial feed were selected; dog fecal metagenomic DNA samples were analyzed using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Pronounced differences in alpha and beta diversities, and taxonomic composition of the core gut microbiota were observed between the two groups. According to alpha diversity, the number of operational taxonomic units, the richness estimates, and diversity indices of microbiota were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the natural diet group than in the commercial feed group. Based on beta diversity, most samples clustered together according to the diet type (p = 0.004). Additionally, the core microbiota between the two groups was different at the phylum, family, and species levels. Marked differences in the taxonomic composition of the core microbiota of the two groups were observed at the species level; Clostridium perfringens (p = 0.017) and Fusobacterium varium (p = 0.030) were more abundant in the natural diet group. Conclusions The gut microbiota of dogs is significantly influenced by diet type (i.e., natural diet and commercial feed). Specifically, dogs fed a natural diet have more diverse and abundant microbial composition in the gut microbiota than dogs fed a commercial feed. In addition, this study suggests that in dogs fed a natural diet, the potential risk of opportunistic infection could be higher, than in dogs fed a commercial feed. The type of diet ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Junhyung Kim
Jae-Uk An
Woohyun Kim
Soomin Lee
Seongbeom Cho
author_facet Junhyung Kim
Jae-Uk An
Woohyun Kim
Soomin Lee
Seongbeom Cho
author_sort Junhyung Kim
title Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform
title_short Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform
title_full Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform
title_fullStr Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform
title_sort differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the illumina miseq platform
publisher BMC
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-017-0218-5
https://doaj.org/article/3e6701f96cb04c6e9f803f4e9f389a17
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_source Gut Pathogens, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017)
op_relation http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13099-017-0218-5
https://doaj.org/toc/1757-4749
doi:10.1186/s13099-017-0218-5
1757-4749
https://doaj.org/article/3e6701f96cb04c6e9f803f4e9f389a17
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-017-0218-5
container_title Gut Pathogens
container_volume 9
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766384786351325184