Frozen: The Potential and Pitfalls of Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology in the Alaskan Arctic

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) offers many advantages for assessing archaeological potential in frozen and partially frozen contexts in high latitude and alpine regions. These settings pose several challenges for GPR, including extreme velocity changes at the interface of frozen and active layers, c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Thomas M. Urban, Jeffrey T. Rasic, Claire Alix, Douglas D. Anderson, Sturt W. Manning, Owen K. Mason, Andrew H. Tremayne, Christopher B. Wolff
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016
Subjects:
Q
Ice
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8121007
https://doaj.org/article/3d6e86a983494bd9b8f121ad96172d4c
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3d6e86a983494bd9b8f121ad96172d4c
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3d6e86a983494bd9b8f121ad96172d4c 2023-05-15T14:54:11+02:00 Frozen: The Potential and Pitfalls of Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology in the Alaskan Arctic Thomas M. Urban Jeffrey T. Rasic Claire Alix Douglas D. Anderson Sturt W. Manning Owen K. Mason Andrew H. Tremayne Christopher B. Wolff 2016-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8121007 https://doaj.org/article/3d6e86a983494bd9b8f121ad96172d4c EN eng MDPI AG http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/12/1007 https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 2072-4292 doi:10.3390/rs8121007 https://doaj.org/article/3d6e86a983494bd9b8f121ad96172d4c Remote Sensing, Vol 8, Iss 12, p 1007 (2016) ground-penetrating radar Alaska Arctic permafrost mammoth Bering Land Bridge Science Q article 2016 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8121007 2022-12-31T07:30:33Z Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) offers many advantages for assessing archaeological potential in frozen and partially frozen contexts in high latitude and alpine regions. These settings pose several challenges for GPR, including extreme velocity changes at the interface of frozen and active layers, cryogenic patterns resulting in anomalies that can easily be mistaken for cultural features, and the difficulty in accessing sites and deploying equipment in remote settings. In this study we discuss some of these challenges while highlighting the potential for this method by describing recent successful investigations with GPR in the region. We draw on cases from Bering Land Bridge National Preserve, Cape Krusenstern National Monument, Kobuk Valley National Park, and Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve. The sites required small aircraft accessibility with light equipment loads and minimal personnel. The substrates we investigate include coastal saturated active layer over permafrost, interior well-drained active layer over permafrost, a frozen thermo-karst lake, and an alpine ice patch. These examples demonstrate that GPR is effective at mapping semi-subterranean house remains in several contexts, including houses with no surface manifestation. GPR is also shown to be effective at mapping anomalies from the skeletal remains of a late Pleistocene mammoth frozen in ice. The potential for using GPR in ice and snow patch archaeology, an area of increasing interest with global environmental change exposing new material each year, is also demonstrated. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Bering Land Bridge Cape Krusenstern Ice permafrost Alaska Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Cape Krusenstern ENVELOPE(-113.903,-113.903,68.401,68.401) Remote Sensing 8 12 1007
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic ground-penetrating radar
Alaska
Arctic
permafrost
mammoth
Bering Land Bridge
Science
Q
spellingShingle ground-penetrating radar
Alaska
Arctic
permafrost
mammoth
Bering Land Bridge
Science
Q
Thomas M. Urban
Jeffrey T. Rasic
Claire Alix
Douglas D. Anderson
Sturt W. Manning
Owen K. Mason
Andrew H. Tremayne
Christopher B. Wolff
Frozen: The Potential and Pitfalls of Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology in the Alaskan Arctic
topic_facet ground-penetrating radar
Alaska
Arctic
permafrost
mammoth
Bering Land Bridge
Science
Q
description Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) offers many advantages for assessing archaeological potential in frozen and partially frozen contexts in high latitude and alpine regions. These settings pose several challenges for GPR, including extreme velocity changes at the interface of frozen and active layers, cryogenic patterns resulting in anomalies that can easily be mistaken for cultural features, and the difficulty in accessing sites and deploying equipment in remote settings. In this study we discuss some of these challenges while highlighting the potential for this method by describing recent successful investigations with GPR in the region. We draw on cases from Bering Land Bridge National Preserve, Cape Krusenstern National Monument, Kobuk Valley National Park, and Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve. The sites required small aircraft accessibility with light equipment loads and minimal personnel. The substrates we investigate include coastal saturated active layer over permafrost, interior well-drained active layer over permafrost, a frozen thermo-karst lake, and an alpine ice patch. These examples demonstrate that GPR is effective at mapping semi-subterranean house remains in several contexts, including houses with no surface manifestation. GPR is also shown to be effective at mapping anomalies from the skeletal remains of a late Pleistocene mammoth frozen in ice. The potential for using GPR in ice and snow patch archaeology, an area of increasing interest with global environmental change exposing new material each year, is also demonstrated.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Thomas M. Urban
Jeffrey T. Rasic
Claire Alix
Douglas D. Anderson
Sturt W. Manning
Owen K. Mason
Andrew H. Tremayne
Christopher B. Wolff
author_facet Thomas M. Urban
Jeffrey T. Rasic
Claire Alix
Douglas D. Anderson
Sturt W. Manning
Owen K. Mason
Andrew H. Tremayne
Christopher B. Wolff
author_sort Thomas M. Urban
title Frozen: The Potential and Pitfalls of Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology in the Alaskan Arctic
title_short Frozen: The Potential and Pitfalls of Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology in the Alaskan Arctic
title_full Frozen: The Potential and Pitfalls of Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology in the Alaskan Arctic
title_fullStr Frozen: The Potential and Pitfalls of Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology in the Alaskan Arctic
title_full_unstemmed Frozen: The Potential and Pitfalls of Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology in the Alaskan Arctic
title_sort frozen: the potential and pitfalls of ground-penetrating radar for archaeology in the alaskan arctic
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8121007
https://doaj.org/article/3d6e86a983494bd9b8f121ad96172d4c
long_lat ENVELOPE(-113.903,-113.903,68.401,68.401)
geographic Arctic
Cape Krusenstern
geographic_facet Arctic
Cape Krusenstern
genre Arctic
Bering Land Bridge
Cape Krusenstern
Ice
permafrost
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic
Bering Land Bridge
Cape Krusenstern
Ice
permafrost
Alaska
op_source Remote Sensing, Vol 8, Iss 12, p 1007 (2016)
op_relation http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/12/1007
https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292
2072-4292
doi:10.3390/rs8121007
https://doaj.org/article/3d6e86a983494bd9b8f121ad96172d4c
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8121007
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 8
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1007
_version_ 1766325906508349440