Kin selection and polygyny: can relatedness lower the polygyny threshold?

Resource polygyny incurs costs of having to share breeding resources for female breeders. When breeding with a relative, however, such costs may be lessened by indirect fitness benefits through kin selection, while benefits from mutualistic behaviour, such as communal defence, may increase. If so, f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Royal Society Open Science
Main Authors: Gaute Grønstøl, Donald Blomqvist, Angela Pauliny, Richard H. Wagner
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2015
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140409
https://doaj.org/article/3d0397dfbab5452385b94bab29ae0869
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3d0397dfbab5452385b94bab29ae0869
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3d0397dfbab5452385b94bab29ae0869 2023-05-15T18:42:34+02:00 Kin selection and polygyny: can relatedness lower the polygyny threshold? Gaute Grønstøl Donald Blomqvist Angela Pauliny Richard H. Wagner 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140409 https://doaj.org/article/3d0397dfbab5452385b94bab29ae0869 EN eng The Royal Society https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.140409 https://doaj.org/toc/2054-5703 2054-5703 doi:10.1098/rsos.140409 https://doaj.org/article/3d0397dfbab5452385b94bab29ae0869 Royal Society Open Science, Vol 2, Iss 6 (2015) kin selection polygyny relatedness mate choice lapwings Science Q article 2015 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140409 2022-12-31T04:17:48Z Resource polygyny incurs costs of having to share breeding resources for female breeders. When breeding with a relative, however, such costs may be lessened by indirect fitness benefits through kin selection, while benefits from mutualistic behaviour, such as communal defence, may increase. If so, females should be less resistant to sharing a territory with a related female than with a non-related one. We investigated whether kin selection may lower the threshold of breeding polygynously, predicting a closer relatedness between polygynous females breeding on the same territory than between females breeding on different territories. Northern lapwings, Vanellus vanellus, are suitable for testing this hypothesis as they are commonly polygynous, both sexes take part in nest defence, and the efficiency of nest defence increases with the number of defenders. Using an index of relatedness derived from DNA fingerprinting, we found that female lapwings that shared polygynous dyads were on average twice as closely related as were random females. Furthermore, relatedness did not correlate with distance between breeders, indicating that our findings cannot be explained by natal philopatry alone. Our results suggest that the polygyny threshold in lapwings may be lowered by inclusive fitness advantages of kin selection. Article in Journal/Newspaper Vanellus vanellus Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Royal Society Open Science 2 6 140409
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic kin selection
polygyny
relatedness
mate choice
lapwings
Science
Q
spellingShingle kin selection
polygyny
relatedness
mate choice
lapwings
Science
Q
Gaute Grønstøl
Donald Blomqvist
Angela Pauliny
Richard H. Wagner
Kin selection and polygyny: can relatedness lower the polygyny threshold?
topic_facet kin selection
polygyny
relatedness
mate choice
lapwings
Science
Q
description Resource polygyny incurs costs of having to share breeding resources for female breeders. When breeding with a relative, however, such costs may be lessened by indirect fitness benefits through kin selection, while benefits from mutualistic behaviour, such as communal defence, may increase. If so, females should be less resistant to sharing a territory with a related female than with a non-related one. We investigated whether kin selection may lower the threshold of breeding polygynously, predicting a closer relatedness between polygynous females breeding on the same territory than between females breeding on different territories. Northern lapwings, Vanellus vanellus, are suitable for testing this hypothesis as they are commonly polygynous, both sexes take part in nest defence, and the efficiency of nest defence increases with the number of defenders. Using an index of relatedness derived from DNA fingerprinting, we found that female lapwings that shared polygynous dyads were on average twice as closely related as were random females. Furthermore, relatedness did not correlate with distance between breeders, indicating that our findings cannot be explained by natal philopatry alone. Our results suggest that the polygyny threshold in lapwings may be lowered by inclusive fitness advantages of kin selection.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Gaute Grønstøl
Donald Blomqvist
Angela Pauliny
Richard H. Wagner
author_facet Gaute Grønstøl
Donald Blomqvist
Angela Pauliny
Richard H. Wagner
author_sort Gaute Grønstøl
title Kin selection and polygyny: can relatedness lower the polygyny threshold?
title_short Kin selection and polygyny: can relatedness lower the polygyny threshold?
title_full Kin selection and polygyny: can relatedness lower the polygyny threshold?
title_fullStr Kin selection and polygyny: can relatedness lower the polygyny threshold?
title_full_unstemmed Kin selection and polygyny: can relatedness lower the polygyny threshold?
title_sort kin selection and polygyny: can relatedness lower the polygyny threshold?
publisher The Royal Society
publishDate 2015
url https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140409
https://doaj.org/article/3d0397dfbab5452385b94bab29ae0869
genre Vanellus vanellus
genre_facet Vanellus vanellus
op_source Royal Society Open Science, Vol 2, Iss 6 (2015)
op_relation https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.140409
https://doaj.org/toc/2054-5703
2054-5703
doi:10.1098/rsos.140409
https://doaj.org/article/3d0397dfbab5452385b94bab29ae0869
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140409
container_title Royal Society Open Science
container_volume 2
container_issue 6
container_start_page 140409
_version_ 1766232280882216960