A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model

Meltwater is important to understanding glacier health and dynamics. Since melt measurements are uncommon, ice ablation estimates are often based on models including the positive degree day (PDD) model. The PDD estimate is popular since it only requires air temperature as input, but suffers from the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: VICTOR C. TSAI, XIAOZHOU RUAN
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.55
https://doaj.org/article/3ccecca28b2c41c99ca55470e64362e3
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3ccecca28b2c41c99ca55470e64362e3
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3ccecca28b2c41c99ca55470e64362e3 2023-05-15T16:21:26+02:00 A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model VICTOR C. TSAI XIAOZHOU RUAN 2018-08-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.55 https://doaj.org/article/3ccecca28b2c41c99ca55470e64362e3 EN eng Cambridge University Press https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143018000552/type/journal_article https://doaj.org/toc/0022-1430 https://doaj.org/toc/1727-5652 doi:10.1017/jog.2018.55 0022-1430 1727-5652 https://doaj.org/article/3ccecca28b2c41c99ca55470e64362e3 Journal of Glaciology, Vol 64, Pp 661-668 (2018) energy balance glacier ablation phenomena melt-surface Environmental sciences GE1-350 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.55 2023-03-12T01:30:59Z Meltwater is important to understanding glacier health and dynamics. Since melt measurements are uncommon, ice ablation estimates are often based on models including the positive degree day (PDD) model. The PDD estimate is popular since it only requires air temperature as input, but suffers from the lack of physical motivation of an energy-balance model. We present a physics-based alternative to the PDD model that still only takes air/surface temperature as input. The model resembles the PDD model except accounting for time lags in ablation when cold ice needs to be warmed. The model is expressed as a differential equation with a single extra parameter related to the efficiency of heating a near-surface layer of ice. With zero thickness, the model reduces to the PDD model, providing a physical basis for the PDD model. Applying the model to data from Greenland, it improves modestly upon the PDD model, with the main improvement being better prediction of early season melting. This new model is a useful compromise, with some of the physics of more realistic models and the simplicity of a PDD model. The model should improve estimates of meltwater production and help constrain PDD parameters when empirical calibration is challenging. Article in Journal/Newspaper glacier Greenland Journal of Glaciology Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Greenland Journal of Glaciology 64 246 661 668
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic energy balance
glacier ablation phenomena
melt-surface
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Meteorology. Climatology
QC851-999
spellingShingle energy balance
glacier ablation phenomena
melt-surface
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Meteorology. Climatology
QC851-999
VICTOR C. TSAI
XIAOZHOU RUAN
A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model
topic_facet energy balance
glacier ablation phenomena
melt-surface
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Meteorology. Climatology
QC851-999
description Meltwater is important to understanding glacier health and dynamics. Since melt measurements are uncommon, ice ablation estimates are often based on models including the positive degree day (PDD) model. The PDD estimate is popular since it only requires air temperature as input, but suffers from the lack of physical motivation of an energy-balance model. We present a physics-based alternative to the PDD model that still only takes air/surface temperature as input. The model resembles the PDD model except accounting for time lags in ablation when cold ice needs to be warmed. The model is expressed as a differential equation with a single extra parameter related to the efficiency of heating a near-surface layer of ice. With zero thickness, the model reduces to the PDD model, providing a physical basis for the PDD model. Applying the model to data from Greenland, it improves modestly upon the PDD model, with the main improvement being better prediction of early season melting. This new model is a useful compromise, with some of the physics of more realistic models and the simplicity of a PDD model. The model should improve estimates of meltwater production and help constrain PDD parameters when empirical calibration is challenging.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author VICTOR C. TSAI
XIAOZHOU RUAN
author_facet VICTOR C. TSAI
XIAOZHOU RUAN
author_sort VICTOR C. TSAI
title A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model
title_short A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model
title_full A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model
title_fullStr A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model
title_full_unstemmed A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model
title_sort simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model
publisher Cambridge University Press
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.55
https://doaj.org/article/3ccecca28b2c41c99ca55470e64362e3
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre glacier
Greenland
Journal of Glaciology
genre_facet glacier
Greenland
Journal of Glaciology
op_source Journal of Glaciology, Vol 64, Pp 661-668 (2018)
op_relation https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143018000552/type/journal_article
https://doaj.org/toc/0022-1430
https://doaj.org/toc/1727-5652
doi:10.1017/jog.2018.55
0022-1430
1727-5652
https://doaj.org/article/3ccecca28b2c41c99ca55470e64362e3
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.55
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 64
container_issue 246
container_start_page 661
op_container_end_page 668
_version_ 1766009430591143936