Eco-Evolutionary Interaction in Competing Phytoplankton: Nutrient Driven Genotype Sorting Likely Explains Dominance Shift and Species Responses to CO2

How ecological and evolutionary processes interact and together determine species and community responses to climate change is poorly understood. We studied long-term dynamics (over approximately 200 asexual generations) in two phytoplankton species, a coccolithophore (Emiliania huxleyi), and a diat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Marine Science
Main Authors: Luisa Listmann, Giannina S. I. Hattich, Birte Matthiessen, Thorsten B. H. Reusch
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Subjects:
CO2
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00634
https://doaj.org/article/3afba24cd1fc482fb64140eef598bd15
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3afba24cd1fc482fb64140eef598bd15
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3afba24cd1fc482fb64140eef598bd15 2023-05-15T17:51:52+02:00 Eco-Evolutionary Interaction in Competing Phytoplankton: Nutrient Driven Genotype Sorting Likely Explains Dominance Shift and Species Responses to CO2 Luisa Listmann Giannina S. I. Hattich Birte Matthiessen Thorsten B. H. Reusch 2020-07-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00634 https://doaj.org/article/3afba24cd1fc482fb64140eef598bd15 EN eng Frontiers Media S.A. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.00634/full https://doaj.org/toc/2296-7745 2296-7745 doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00634 https://doaj.org/article/3afba24cd1fc482fb64140eef598bd15 Frontiers in Marine Science, Vol 7 (2020) eco-evolutionary interaction CO2 ocean acidification competition phytoplankton C. affinis Science Q General. Including nature conservation geographical distribution QH1-199.5 article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00634 2022-12-31T13:34:11Z How ecological and evolutionary processes interact and together determine species and community responses to climate change is poorly understood. We studied long-term dynamics (over approximately 200 asexual generations) in two phytoplankton species, a coccolithophore (Emiliania huxleyi), and a diatom (Chaetoceros affinis), to increased CO2 growing alone, or competing with one another in co-occurrence. To allow for rapid evolutionary responses, the experiment started with a standing genetic variation of nine genotypes in each of the species. Under co-occurrence of both species, we observed a dominance shift from C. affinis to E. huxleyi after about 120 generations in both CO2 treatments, but more pronounced under high CO2. Associated with this shift, we only found weak adaptation to high CO2 in the diatom and none in the coccolithophore in terms of species’ growth rates. In addition, no adaptation to interspecific competition could be observed by comparing the single to the two-species treatments in reciprocal assays, regardless of the CO2 treatment. Nevertheless, highly reproducible genotype sorting left only one genotype remaining for each of the species among all treatments. This strong evolutionary selection coincided with the dominance shift from C. affinis to E. huxleyi. Since all other conditions were kept constant over time, the most parsimonious explanation for the dominance shift is that the strong evolutionary selection was driven by the experimental nutrient conditions, and in turn potentially altered competitive ability of the two species. Thus, observed changes in the simplest possible two-species phytoplankton “community” demonstrated that eco-evolutionary interactions can be critical for predicting community responses to climate change in rapidly dividing organisms such as phytoplankton. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ocean acidification Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Frontiers in Marine Science 7
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic eco-evolutionary interaction
CO2
ocean acidification
competition
phytoplankton
C. affinis
Science
Q
General. Including nature conservation
geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
spellingShingle eco-evolutionary interaction
CO2
ocean acidification
competition
phytoplankton
C. affinis
Science
Q
General. Including nature conservation
geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
Luisa Listmann
Giannina S. I. Hattich
Birte Matthiessen
Thorsten B. H. Reusch
Eco-Evolutionary Interaction in Competing Phytoplankton: Nutrient Driven Genotype Sorting Likely Explains Dominance Shift and Species Responses to CO2
topic_facet eco-evolutionary interaction
CO2
ocean acidification
competition
phytoplankton
C. affinis
Science
Q
General. Including nature conservation
geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
description How ecological and evolutionary processes interact and together determine species and community responses to climate change is poorly understood. We studied long-term dynamics (over approximately 200 asexual generations) in two phytoplankton species, a coccolithophore (Emiliania huxleyi), and a diatom (Chaetoceros affinis), to increased CO2 growing alone, or competing with one another in co-occurrence. To allow for rapid evolutionary responses, the experiment started with a standing genetic variation of nine genotypes in each of the species. Under co-occurrence of both species, we observed a dominance shift from C. affinis to E. huxleyi after about 120 generations in both CO2 treatments, but more pronounced under high CO2. Associated with this shift, we only found weak adaptation to high CO2 in the diatom and none in the coccolithophore in terms of species’ growth rates. In addition, no adaptation to interspecific competition could be observed by comparing the single to the two-species treatments in reciprocal assays, regardless of the CO2 treatment. Nevertheless, highly reproducible genotype sorting left only one genotype remaining for each of the species among all treatments. This strong evolutionary selection coincided with the dominance shift from C. affinis to E. huxleyi. Since all other conditions were kept constant over time, the most parsimonious explanation for the dominance shift is that the strong evolutionary selection was driven by the experimental nutrient conditions, and in turn potentially altered competitive ability of the two species. Thus, observed changes in the simplest possible two-species phytoplankton “community” demonstrated that eco-evolutionary interactions can be critical for predicting community responses to climate change in rapidly dividing organisms such as phytoplankton.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Luisa Listmann
Giannina S. I. Hattich
Birte Matthiessen
Thorsten B. H. Reusch
author_facet Luisa Listmann
Giannina S. I. Hattich
Birte Matthiessen
Thorsten B. H. Reusch
author_sort Luisa Listmann
title Eco-Evolutionary Interaction in Competing Phytoplankton: Nutrient Driven Genotype Sorting Likely Explains Dominance Shift and Species Responses to CO2
title_short Eco-Evolutionary Interaction in Competing Phytoplankton: Nutrient Driven Genotype Sorting Likely Explains Dominance Shift and Species Responses to CO2
title_full Eco-Evolutionary Interaction in Competing Phytoplankton: Nutrient Driven Genotype Sorting Likely Explains Dominance Shift and Species Responses to CO2
title_fullStr Eco-Evolutionary Interaction in Competing Phytoplankton: Nutrient Driven Genotype Sorting Likely Explains Dominance Shift and Species Responses to CO2
title_full_unstemmed Eco-Evolutionary Interaction in Competing Phytoplankton: Nutrient Driven Genotype Sorting Likely Explains Dominance Shift and Species Responses to CO2
title_sort eco-evolutionary interaction in competing phytoplankton: nutrient driven genotype sorting likely explains dominance shift and species responses to co2
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00634
https://doaj.org/article/3afba24cd1fc482fb64140eef598bd15
genre Ocean acidification
genre_facet Ocean acidification
op_source Frontiers in Marine Science, Vol 7 (2020)
op_relation https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.00634/full
https://doaj.org/toc/2296-7745
2296-7745
doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00634
https://doaj.org/article/3afba24cd1fc482fb64140eef598bd15
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00634
container_title Frontiers in Marine Science
container_volume 7
_version_ 1766159158732652544