Indigenous participation in peer review publications and the editorial process: reflections from a workshop

• Published in: Arctic Science
• Main Authors: L.L. Loseto, K. Breton-Honeyman, D.N. Etiendem, N. Johnson, T. Pearce, J. Allen, A. Amos, J. Arqviq, J.E. Baak, É. Bélanger, M.P.T. Bourdages, J.R. Brammer, D. Fawcett, J. Gérin-Lajoie, G. Gilbert, K. Hansen-Craik, E. Loring, A. Perrin, M. Slavitch
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English; French
• Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2020
• Subjects: research; indigenous; inuit; equality; inclusion; arctic; indigenous knowledge; qaujinasuarniq; taimaalluaqatigiigniq; piqasiujiniq; nunaqaqqaaksimajut; Environmental sciences; GE1-350; Environmental engineering; TA170-171; Arctic; ArcticNet
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2020-0023; https://doaj.org/article/3a941230d7874340b4ae40a08e3653b8

This communication paper reflects on discussions from a workshop about Indigenous involvement in the peer review and editorial processes. Arctic-based research is undergoing a paradigm shift to include local Indigenous Peoples, their priorities, and knowledge throughout the research process. This special issue is an excellent example; it highlights research involving partnerships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers to support knowledge co-production. Despite this shift, we find little space within the standard peer review and editorial processes for Indigenous Peoples, their perspectives, and knowledge. To discuss this issue, we organized a half-day workshop at the 2019 ArcticNet Annual Scientific Meeting with a diversity of Indigenous and non-Indigenous participants who are involved in Arctic research. The discussions revealed that answering questions about the involvement of Indigenous Peoples in the peer review and editorial processes largely begins by addressing the challenges of achieving equity in the research process generally. Our discussions demonstrated that further conversations are needed and that no single approach will work in all cases, but that there are several concrete actions that researchers, universities, funding organizations, and publishers can take to begin addressing this issue. Taanna tusaumaqatigiguti paippaaq uqausiqarmat uqallaqatigigutaulauqtunik katimasinnaarutiqaktillugit Nunaqaqqaaksimanirmut qaujisattiarnirmik qimirrulutik ammalu aaqqiksuqtautiuqtillugit pilirianguningit. Ukiuqtaqturmittuq qaujinasuarvik pilirivalliajuugaluaq tukisinarutaugajuktumik piliringaaliqpallialutik piqasiujjauqullugit nunalinni Nunaqaqqaaqsimajut inungit, ammalu qaujimaningit iluunnalimaangani qaujinasuarniup pilirianguningata. Taanna ajjiungittuq akaunngiliuruti piujuaalungmat tukisinaqsitittijjutauninga; ujjirnaqsitittingmat qaujinasuarnirmik piliriqatautittininganit piliriqatigiignningitigu kamakkua Nunaqaqqaaksimajut ammalu uqqurmiut qaujinasuaqtit ikajuqsuiqullugit qaujimanirmik ...