Comparative analysis of shipboard three-component magnetometer (STCM) and proton precession magnetometer (PPM) datasets in the Australian-Antarctic Ridge
Two different types of magnetometer, the Proton Precession Magnetometer (PPM) and the Shipboard Three-Component Magnetometer (STCM), each possess its own strengths and weaknesses in their operation. The PPM can measure the total intensity of the Earth's geomagnetic field without requiring compl...
Published in: | Data in Brief |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109351 https://doaj.org/article/3a37c640690042358366e6641122d7de |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3a37c640690042358366e6641122d7de |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3a37c640690042358366e6641122d7de 2023-09-05T13:14:14+02:00 Comparative analysis of shipboard three-component magnetometer (STCM) and proton precession magnetometer (PPM) datasets in the Australian-Antarctic Ridge Hakkyum Choi Seung-Sep Kim Sung-Hyun Park 2023-08-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109351 https://doaj.org/article/3a37c640690042358366e6641122d7de EN eng Elsevier http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340923004705 https://doaj.org/toc/2352-3409 2352-3409 doi:10.1016/j.dib.2023.109351 https://doaj.org/article/3a37c640690042358366e6641122d7de Data in Brief, Vol 49, Iss , Pp 109351- (2023) Geomagnetic field Vector magnetic field Magnetometer Marine magnetic survey Magnetized seafloor Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics R858-859.7 Science (General) Q1-390 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109351 2023-08-20T00:36:29Z Two different types of magnetometer, the Proton Precession Magnetometer (PPM) and the Shipboard Three-Component Magnetometer (STCM), each possess its own strengths and weaknesses in their operation. The PPM can measure the total intensity of the Earth's geomagnetic field without requiring complicated post-processing and correction. However, its operation is often limited by the condition of the sea surface. In contrast, the STCM can measure three components of the Earth's field -X, Y and Z - and is not restricted by the sea condition. However, the STCM is highly sensitive to ship's viscous magnetization, which introduces significant noise into the data quality and can lead to a loss in measured geomagnetic field. The simultaneous measurements were carried out using both types of magnetometers along the same section within the Australian-Antarctic Ridge. This region experiences strong measurements of the geomagnetic field due to its proximity to the geomagnetic South Pole. We then compared the differences between the two datasets. For each dataset, we calculated a unique linear trend and subsequently removed the discrepancy between the trends. The corrected STCM data exhibited excellent agreement with the PPM data, suggesting the potential for complementary utilization of the STCM along the PPM. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic South pole South pole Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Antarctic Australian Antarctic Ridge ENVELOPE(110.000,110.000,-50.000,-50.000) South Pole Data in Brief 49 109351 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
Geomagnetic field Vector magnetic field Magnetometer Marine magnetic survey Magnetized seafloor Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics R858-859.7 Science (General) Q1-390 |
spellingShingle |
Geomagnetic field Vector magnetic field Magnetometer Marine magnetic survey Magnetized seafloor Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics R858-859.7 Science (General) Q1-390 Hakkyum Choi Seung-Sep Kim Sung-Hyun Park Comparative analysis of shipboard three-component magnetometer (STCM) and proton precession magnetometer (PPM) datasets in the Australian-Antarctic Ridge |
topic_facet |
Geomagnetic field Vector magnetic field Magnetometer Marine magnetic survey Magnetized seafloor Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics R858-859.7 Science (General) Q1-390 |
description |
Two different types of magnetometer, the Proton Precession Magnetometer (PPM) and the Shipboard Three-Component Magnetometer (STCM), each possess its own strengths and weaknesses in their operation. The PPM can measure the total intensity of the Earth's geomagnetic field without requiring complicated post-processing and correction. However, its operation is often limited by the condition of the sea surface. In contrast, the STCM can measure three components of the Earth's field -X, Y and Z - and is not restricted by the sea condition. However, the STCM is highly sensitive to ship's viscous magnetization, which introduces significant noise into the data quality and can lead to a loss in measured geomagnetic field. The simultaneous measurements were carried out using both types of magnetometers along the same section within the Australian-Antarctic Ridge. This region experiences strong measurements of the geomagnetic field due to its proximity to the geomagnetic South Pole. We then compared the differences between the two datasets. For each dataset, we calculated a unique linear trend and subsequently removed the discrepancy between the trends. The corrected STCM data exhibited excellent agreement with the PPM data, suggesting the potential for complementary utilization of the STCM along the PPM. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Hakkyum Choi Seung-Sep Kim Sung-Hyun Park |
author_facet |
Hakkyum Choi Seung-Sep Kim Sung-Hyun Park |
author_sort |
Hakkyum Choi |
title |
Comparative analysis of shipboard three-component magnetometer (STCM) and proton precession magnetometer (PPM) datasets in the Australian-Antarctic Ridge |
title_short |
Comparative analysis of shipboard three-component magnetometer (STCM) and proton precession magnetometer (PPM) datasets in the Australian-Antarctic Ridge |
title_full |
Comparative analysis of shipboard three-component magnetometer (STCM) and proton precession magnetometer (PPM) datasets in the Australian-Antarctic Ridge |
title_fullStr |
Comparative analysis of shipboard three-component magnetometer (STCM) and proton precession magnetometer (PPM) datasets in the Australian-Antarctic Ridge |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative analysis of shipboard three-component magnetometer (STCM) and proton precession magnetometer (PPM) datasets in the Australian-Antarctic Ridge |
title_sort |
comparative analysis of shipboard three-component magnetometer (stcm) and proton precession magnetometer (ppm) datasets in the australian-antarctic ridge |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109351 https://doaj.org/article/3a37c640690042358366e6641122d7de |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(110.000,110.000,-50.000,-50.000) |
geographic |
Antarctic Australian Antarctic Ridge South Pole |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic Australian Antarctic Ridge South Pole |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic South pole South pole |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic South pole South pole |
op_source |
Data in Brief, Vol 49, Iss , Pp 109351- (2023) |
op_relation |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340923004705 https://doaj.org/toc/2352-3409 2352-3409 doi:10.1016/j.dib.2023.109351 https://doaj.org/article/3a37c640690042358366e6641122d7de |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109351 |
container_title |
Data in Brief |
container_volume |
49 |
container_start_page |
109351 |
_version_ |
1776205255026933760 |