Comparative analysis of shipboard three-component magnetometer (STCM) and proton precession magnetometer (PPM) datasets in the Australian-Antarctic Ridge

• Published in: Data in Brief
• Main Authors: Hakkyum Choi, Seung-Sep Kim, Sung-Hyun Park
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2023
• Subjects: Geomagnetic field; Vector magnetic field; Magnetometer; Marine magnetic survey; Magnetized seafloor; Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics; R858-859.7; Science (General); Q1-390; Antarctic; Australian Antarctic Ridge; South Pole; Antarc*; South pole
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109351; https://doaj.org/article/3a37c640690042358366e6641122d7de

Two different types of magnetometer, the Proton Precession Magnetometer (PPM) and the Shipboard Three-Component Magnetometer (STCM), each possess its own strengths and weaknesses in their operation. The PPM can measure the total intensity of the Earth's geomagnetic field without requiring complicated post-processing and correction. However, its operation is often limited by the condition of the sea surface. In contrast, the STCM can measure three components of the Earth's field -X, Y and Z - and is not restricted by the sea condition. However, the STCM is highly sensitive to ship's viscous magnetization, which introduces significant noise into the data quality and can lead to a loss in measured geomagnetic field. The simultaneous measurements were carried out using both types of magnetometers along the same section within the Australian-Antarctic Ridge. This region experiences strong measurements of the geomagnetic field due to its proximity to the geomagnetic South Pole. We then compared the differences between the two datasets. For each dataset, we calculated a unique linear trend and subsequently removed the discrepancy between the trends. The corrected STCM data exhibited excellent agreement with the PPM data, suggesting the potential for complementary utilization of the STCM along the PPM.