Estimating the selectivity of unpaired trawl data: a case study with a pelagic gear

Most selectivity experiments employ either the covered codend or paired gear methods. It is not always possible, however, to use these methods. Owing to operational, biological and/or environmental considerations, there may be no obvious way or it may be inappropriate to pair the test and control da...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientia Marina
Main Authors: Manu Sistiaga, Bent Herrmann, Eduardo Grimaldo, Finbarr G. O’Neill
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas 2016
Subjects:
cod
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04409.26B
https://doaj.org/article/37bf58e18db34401b23ebc040dfa9b2f
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:37bf58e18db34401b23ebc040dfa9b2f
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:37bf58e18db34401b23ebc040dfa9b2f 2023-05-15T15:39:00+02:00 Estimating the selectivity of unpaired trawl data: a case study with a pelagic gear Manu Sistiaga Bent Herrmann Eduardo Grimaldo Finbarr G. O’Neill 2016-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04409.26B https://doaj.org/article/37bf58e18db34401b23ebc040dfa9b2f EN eng Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas http://scientiamarina.revistas.csic.es/index.php/scientiamarina/article/view/1643 https://doaj.org/toc/0214-8358 https://doaj.org/toc/1886-8134 0214-8358 1886-8134 doi:10.3989/scimar.04409.26B https://doaj.org/article/37bf58e18db34401b23ebc040dfa9b2f Scientia Marina, Vol 80, Iss 3, Pp 321-327 (2016) trawl selectivity pelagic fisheries unpaired data cod Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling SH1-691 article 2016 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04409.26B 2022-12-31T15:29:15Z Most selectivity experiments employ either the covered codend or paired gear methods. It is not always possible, however, to use these methods. Owing to operational, biological and/or environmental considerations, there may be no obvious way or it may be inappropriate to pair the test and control data. Hence, it will not be possible to estimate the selectivity of the gear and its uncertainty using standard statistical methods. This study presents a methodology for analysing the selectivity of fishing gears from unpaired test and control data. The uncertainty in the control and test population structures is accounted for by using a double bootstrapping procedure that takes into account both between-haul and within-haul variation. This bootstrapping approach is used to assess the selectivity of two different devices, a 139.5 mm T90 codend and a 135.9 mm codend with 140.9 mm lateral exit windows, in the Barents Sea pelagic cod trawl fishery. The purpose of the experiment was to test and compare the performance of the two devices in pelagic trawl fisheries, where high densities of fish can be encountered. Significant differences were detected between the T90 codend and the codend with the exit windows but only for sizes of cod between 55 and 76 cm. Article in Journal/Newspaper Barents Sea Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Barents Sea Scientia Marina 80 3 321 327
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic trawl selectivity
pelagic fisheries
unpaired data
cod
Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling
SH1-691
spellingShingle trawl selectivity
pelagic fisheries
unpaired data
cod
Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling
SH1-691
Manu Sistiaga
Bent Herrmann
Eduardo Grimaldo
Finbarr G. O’Neill
Estimating the selectivity of unpaired trawl data: a case study with a pelagic gear
topic_facet trawl selectivity
pelagic fisheries
unpaired data
cod
Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling
SH1-691
description Most selectivity experiments employ either the covered codend or paired gear methods. It is not always possible, however, to use these methods. Owing to operational, biological and/or environmental considerations, there may be no obvious way or it may be inappropriate to pair the test and control data. Hence, it will not be possible to estimate the selectivity of the gear and its uncertainty using standard statistical methods. This study presents a methodology for analysing the selectivity of fishing gears from unpaired test and control data. The uncertainty in the control and test population structures is accounted for by using a double bootstrapping procedure that takes into account both between-haul and within-haul variation. This bootstrapping approach is used to assess the selectivity of two different devices, a 139.5 mm T90 codend and a 135.9 mm codend with 140.9 mm lateral exit windows, in the Barents Sea pelagic cod trawl fishery. The purpose of the experiment was to test and compare the performance of the two devices in pelagic trawl fisheries, where high densities of fish can be encountered. Significant differences were detected between the T90 codend and the codend with the exit windows but only for sizes of cod between 55 and 76 cm.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Manu Sistiaga
Bent Herrmann
Eduardo Grimaldo
Finbarr G. O’Neill
author_facet Manu Sistiaga
Bent Herrmann
Eduardo Grimaldo
Finbarr G. O’Neill
author_sort Manu Sistiaga
title Estimating the selectivity of unpaired trawl data: a case study with a pelagic gear
title_short Estimating the selectivity of unpaired trawl data: a case study with a pelagic gear
title_full Estimating the selectivity of unpaired trawl data: a case study with a pelagic gear
title_fullStr Estimating the selectivity of unpaired trawl data: a case study with a pelagic gear
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the selectivity of unpaired trawl data: a case study with a pelagic gear
title_sort estimating the selectivity of unpaired trawl data: a case study with a pelagic gear
publisher Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04409.26B
https://doaj.org/article/37bf58e18db34401b23ebc040dfa9b2f
geographic Barents Sea
geographic_facet Barents Sea
genre Barents Sea
genre_facet Barents Sea
op_source Scientia Marina, Vol 80, Iss 3, Pp 321-327 (2016)
op_relation http://scientiamarina.revistas.csic.es/index.php/scientiamarina/article/view/1643
https://doaj.org/toc/0214-8358
https://doaj.org/toc/1886-8134
0214-8358
1886-8134
doi:10.3989/scimar.04409.26B
https://doaj.org/article/37bf58e18db34401b23ebc040dfa9b2f
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04409.26B
container_title Scientia Marina
container_volume 80
container_issue 3
container_start_page 321
op_container_end_page 327
_version_ 1766370455877320704