Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station?

Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) is one of the four geodetic space techniques contributing to the realisation of terrestrial reference frames (TRFs) as well as to the determination of Earth Rotation Parameters (ERPs). The current SLR tracking network suffers from an insufficient network geometry due to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in Geosciences
Main Authors: A. Kehm, M. Bloßfeld, P. König, F. Seitz
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019
https://doaj.org/article/37b667d6c7324b01b51422b86f95cf20
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:37b667d6c7324b01b51422b86f95cf20
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:37b667d6c7324b01b51422b86f95cf20 2023-05-15T13:31:16+02:00 Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station? A. Kehm M. Bloßfeld P. König F. Seitz 2019-11-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019 https://doaj.org/article/37b667d6c7324b01b51422b86f95cf20 EN eng Copernicus Publications https://www.adv-geosci.net/50/17/2019/adgeo-50-17-2019.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7340 https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7359 doi:10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019 1680-7340 1680-7359 https://doaj.org/article/37b667d6c7324b01b51422b86f95cf20 Advances in Geosciences, Vol 50, Pp 17-25 (2019) Science Q Geology QE1-996.5 Dynamic and structural geology QE500-639.5 article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019 2022-12-31T15:51:56Z Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) is one of the four geodetic space techniques contributing to the realisation of terrestrial reference frames (TRFs) as well as to the determination of Earth Rotation Parameters (ERPs). The current SLR tracking network suffers from an insufficient network geometry due to a lack of stations especially in the southern hemisphere. Previous simulation studies have shown that the extension of the global SLR tracking network is indispensable for reaching the target accuracy of future TRFs according to user requests and the ambitious goals of the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS). The simulation study presented here puts the focus on a determination of the locations where additional SLR stations are most valuable for an improved estimation of the geodetic parameters. Within the present study, we perform a simulation of a set of stations distributed homogeneously over the globe and compare different solutions, always adding one of these simulated stations to the real SLR station network. This approach has been chosen in order to be able to investigate the deficiencies of the existing SLR network and to judge in which regions on the globe an additional SLR station would be most valuable for the improvement of certain geodetic parameters of SLR-derived reference frames. It is shown that the optimum location of a future SLR station depends on the parameter of interest. In case of the ERPs, the main potential for improvement by a single additional station can be shown for locations in polar regions (improvement for y pole up to 7 %) and for locations along the equator for the lengh of day (LOD, improvement up to 1.5 %). The TRF parameters would benefit from an additional station around the pierce points of the axes of the terrestrial reference frame (improvement for t y up to 4 %), the Arctic and the Pacific Ocean region ( t z improved by up to 4.5 %), and the Antarctic and the Indian Ocean region (scale improved by up to 2.2 %). As outcome of this study, it is concluded that an additional ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Antarctic The Antarctic Pacific Indian Advances in Geosciences 50 17 25
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Science
Q
Geology
QE1-996.5
Dynamic and structural geology
QE500-639.5
spellingShingle Science
Q
Geology
QE1-996.5
Dynamic and structural geology
QE500-639.5
A. Kehm
M. Bloßfeld
P. König
F. Seitz
Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station?
topic_facet Science
Q
Geology
QE1-996.5
Dynamic and structural geology
QE500-639.5
description Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) is one of the four geodetic space techniques contributing to the realisation of terrestrial reference frames (TRFs) as well as to the determination of Earth Rotation Parameters (ERPs). The current SLR tracking network suffers from an insufficient network geometry due to a lack of stations especially in the southern hemisphere. Previous simulation studies have shown that the extension of the global SLR tracking network is indispensable for reaching the target accuracy of future TRFs according to user requests and the ambitious goals of the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS). The simulation study presented here puts the focus on a determination of the locations where additional SLR stations are most valuable for an improved estimation of the geodetic parameters. Within the present study, we perform a simulation of a set of stations distributed homogeneously over the globe and compare different solutions, always adding one of these simulated stations to the real SLR station network. This approach has been chosen in order to be able to investigate the deficiencies of the existing SLR network and to judge in which regions on the globe an additional SLR station would be most valuable for the improvement of certain geodetic parameters of SLR-derived reference frames. It is shown that the optimum location of a future SLR station depends on the parameter of interest. In case of the ERPs, the main potential for improvement by a single additional station can be shown for locations in polar regions (improvement for y pole up to 7 %) and for locations along the equator for the lengh of day (LOD, improvement up to 1.5 %). The TRF parameters would benefit from an additional station around the pierce points of the axes of the terrestrial reference frame (improvement for t y up to 4 %), the Arctic and the Pacific Ocean region ( t z improved by up to 4.5 %), and the Antarctic and the Indian Ocean region (scale improved by up to 2.2 %). As outcome of this study, it is concluded that an additional ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author A. Kehm
M. Bloßfeld
P. König
F. Seitz
author_facet A. Kehm
M. Bloßfeld
P. König
F. Seitz
author_sort A. Kehm
title Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station?
title_short Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station?
title_full Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station?
title_fullStr Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station?
title_full_unstemmed Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station?
title_sort future trfs and ggos – where to put the next slr station?
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019
https://doaj.org/article/37b667d6c7324b01b51422b86f95cf20
geographic Arctic
Antarctic
The Antarctic
Pacific
Indian
geographic_facet Arctic
Antarctic
The Antarctic
Pacific
Indian
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
op_source Advances in Geosciences, Vol 50, Pp 17-25 (2019)
op_relation https://www.adv-geosci.net/50/17/2019/adgeo-50-17-2019.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7340
https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7359
doi:10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019
1680-7340
1680-7359
https://doaj.org/article/37b667d6c7324b01b51422b86f95cf20
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019
container_title Advances in Geosciences
container_volume 50
container_start_page 17
op_container_end_page 25
_version_ 1766017131026055168