Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station?
Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) is one of the four geodetic space techniques contributing to the realisation of terrestrial reference frames (TRFs) as well as to the determination of Earth Rotation Parameters (ERPs). The current SLR tracking network suffers from an insufficient network geometry due to...
Published in: | Advances in Geosciences |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019 https://doaj.org/article/37b667d6c7324b01b51422b86f95cf20 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:37b667d6c7324b01b51422b86f95cf20 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:37b667d6c7324b01b51422b86f95cf20 2023-05-15T13:31:16+02:00 Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station? A. Kehm M. Bloßfeld P. König F. Seitz 2019-11-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019 https://doaj.org/article/37b667d6c7324b01b51422b86f95cf20 EN eng Copernicus Publications https://www.adv-geosci.net/50/17/2019/adgeo-50-17-2019.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7340 https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7359 doi:10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019 1680-7340 1680-7359 https://doaj.org/article/37b667d6c7324b01b51422b86f95cf20 Advances in Geosciences, Vol 50, Pp 17-25 (2019) Science Q Geology QE1-996.5 Dynamic and structural geology QE500-639.5 article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019 2022-12-31T15:51:56Z Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) is one of the four geodetic space techniques contributing to the realisation of terrestrial reference frames (TRFs) as well as to the determination of Earth Rotation Parameters (ERPs). The current SLR tracking network suffers from an insufficient network geometry due to a lack of stations especially in the southern hemisphere. Previous simulation studies have shown that the extension of the global SLR tracking network is indispensable for reaching the target accuracy of future TRFs according to user requests and the ambitious goals of the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS). The simulation study presented here puts the focus on a determination of the locations where additional SLR stations are most valuable for an improved estimation of the geodetic parameters. Within the present study, we perform a simulation of a set of stations distributed homogeneously over the globe and compare different solutions, always adding one of these simulated stations to the real SLR station network. This approach has been chosen in order to be able to investigate the deficiencies of the existing SLR network and to judge in which regions on the globe an additional SLR station would be most valuable for the improvement of certain geodetic parameters of SLR-derived reference frames. It is shown that the optimum location of a future SLR station depends on the parameter of interest. In case of the ERPs, the main potential for improvement by a single additional station can be shown for locations in polar regions (improvement for y pole up to 7 %) and for locations along the equator for the lengh of day (LOD, improvement up to 1.5 %). The TRF parameters would benefit from an additional station around the pierce points of the axes of the terrestrial reference frame (improvement for t y up to 4 %), the Arctic and the Pacific Ocean region ( t z improved by up to 4.5 %), and the Antarctic and the Indian Ocean region (scale improved by up to 2.2 %). As outcome of this study, it is concluded that an additional ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Antarctic The Antarctic Pacific Indian Advances in Geosciences 50 17 25 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
Science Q Geology QE1-996.5 Dynamic and structural geology QE500-639.5 |
spellingShingle |
Science Q Geology QE1-996.5 Dynamic and structural geology QE500-639.5 A. Kehm M. Bloßfeld P. König F. Seitz Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station? |
topic_facet |
Science Q Geology QE1-996.5 Dynamic and structural geology QE500-639.5 |
description |
Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) is one of the four geodetic space techniques contributing to the realisation of terrestrial reference frames (TRFs) as well as to the determination of Earth Rotation Parameters (ERPs). The current SLR tracking network suffers from an insufficient network geometry due to a lack of stations especially in the southern hemisphere. Previous simulation studies have shown that the extension of the global SLR tracking network is indispensable for reaching the target accuracy of future TRFs according to user requests and the ambitious goals of the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS). The simulation study presented here puts the focus on a determination of the locations where additional SLR stations are most valuable for an improved estimation of the geodetic parameters. Within the present study, we perform a simulation of a set of stations distributed homogeneously over the globe and compare different solutions, always adding one of these simulated stations to the real SLR station network. This approach has been chosen in order to be able to investigate the deficiencies of the existing SLR network and to judge in which regions on the globe an additional SLR station would be most valuable for the improvement of certain geodetic parameters of SLR-derived reference frames. It is shown that the optimum location of a future SLR station depends on the parameter of interest. In case of the ERPs, the main potential for improvement by a single additional station can be shown for locations in polar regions (improvement for y pole up to 7 %) and for locations along the equator for the lengh of day (LOD, improvement up to 1.5 %). The TRF parameters would benefit from an additional station around the pierce points of the axes of the terrestrial reference frame (improvement for t y up to 4 %), the Arctic and the Pacific Ocean region ( t z improved by up to 4.5 %), and the Antarctic and the Indian Ocean region (scale improved by up to 2.2 %). As outcome of this study, it is concluded that an additional ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
A. Kehm M. Bloßfeld P. König F. Seitz |
author_facet |
A. Kehm M. Bloßfeld P. König F. Seitz |
author_sort |
A. Kehm |
title |
Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station? |
title_short |
Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station? |
title_full |
Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station? |
title_fullStr |
Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station? |
title_sort |
future trfs and ggos – where to put the next slr station? |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019 https://doaj.org/article/37b667d6c7324b01b51422b86f95cf20 |
geographic |
Arctic Antarctic The Antarctic Pacific Indian |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Antarctic The Antarctic Pacific Indian |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Arctic |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Arctic |
op_source |
Advances in Geosciences, Vol 50, Pp 17-25 (2019) |
op_relation |
https://www.adv-geosci.net/50/17/2019/adgeo-50-17-2019.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7340 https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7359 doi:10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019 1680-7340 1680-7359 https://doaj.org/article/37b667d6c7324b01b51422b86f95cf20 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019 |
container_title |
Advances in Geosciences |
container_volume |
50 |
container_start_page |
17 |
op_container_end_page |
25 |
_version_ |
1766017131026055168 |