US–Canada Beaufort Sea Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Perspective of International Law

Introduction. Maritime boundary disputes and exercising sovereignty in the Arctic are of great current interest in the International Law since there is no uniform understanding of the limits of applicability of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 to the Arctic Ocean taking into...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Moscow Journal of International Law
Main Author: I. V. Bunik
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Russian
Published: Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO) 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2018-2-126-137
https://doaj.org/article/3735e13260644f7c8b9b01a181c17ee0
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3735e13260644f7c8b9b01a181c17ee0
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3735e13260644f7c8b9b01a181c17ee0 2024-09-15T17:53:47+00:00 US–Canada Beaufort Sea Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Perspective of International Law I. V. Bunik 2018-11-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2018-2-126-137 https://doaj.org/article/3735e13260644f7c8b9b01a181c17ee0 EN RU eng rus Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO) https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/262 https://doaj.org/toc/0869-0049 https://doaj.org/toc/2619-0893 0869-0049 2619-0893 doi:10.24833/0869-0049-2018-2-126-137 https://doaj.org/article/3735e13260644f7c8b9b01a181c17ee0 Московский журнал международного права, Vol 0, Iss 2, Pp 126-137 (2018) arctic law law of the sea maritime delimitation beaufort sea convention concerning the limits of their respective possessions on the northwest coast of america and the navigation of the pacific ocean 1825 special circumstances in international law equidistance principle indigenous people estoppel principle Law of nations KZ2-6785 Comparative law. International uniform law K520-5582 article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2018-2-126-137 2024-08-05T17:48:51Z Introduction. Maritime boundary disputes and exercising sovereignty in the Arctic are of great current interest in the International Law since there is no uniform understanding of the limits of applicability of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 to the Arctic Ocean taking into account the international customary law and historic rights of the coastal states. One of such disputes is the US-Canada Beaufort Sea maritime boundary dispute which is of vast importance due to the hydrocarbon exploration of these states in the outlined area as well as due to the conclusion and entry into force of the Treaty between the Kingdom of Norway and the Russian Federation concerning Maritime Delimitation and Cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean 2010.Materials and methods. The theoretical background of this research consists of works of distinguished Russian and foreign scholars and specialists in International Law. The analytical framework includes the treaties between Arctic coastal states concerning maritime delimitation (the Convention Concerning the Limits of Their Respective Possessions on the Northwest Coast of America and the Navigation of the Pacific Ocean 1825, Treaty concerning the Cession of the Russian Possessions in North America by his Majesty the Emperor of all the Russia to the United States of America 1867, Agreement between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the maritime boundary 1990), national legislation of the US and Canada, diplomatic notes. The research is based on methods such as formal logic, including analysis, synthesis, analogy and modeling historical research, as well as systematic, historical and comparative methods.Research results. Based on the results of the study, the author notes that there are considerable differences in the US and Canada’s legal stances concerning the disputed area of the Beaufort Sea, including in particular the opposing views of these states on the applicability of the Convention 1825 to their ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Ocean Barents Sea Beaufort Sea Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Moscow Journal of International Law 2 126 137
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
Russian
topic arctic law
law of the sea
maritime delimitation
beaufort sea
convention concerning the limits of their respective possessions on the northwest coast of america and the navigation of the pacific ocean 1825
special circumstances in international law
equidistance principle
indigenous people
estoppel principle
Law of nations
KZ2-6785
Comparative law. International uniform law
K520-5582
spellingShingle arctic law
law of the sea
maritime delimitation
beaufort sea
convention concerning the limits of their respective possessions on the northwest coast of america and the navigation of the pacific ocean 1825
special circumstances in international law
equidistance principle
indigenous people
estoppel principle
Law of nations
KZ2-6785
Comparative law. International uniform law
K520-5582
I. V. Bunik
US–Canada Beaufort Sea Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Perspective of International Law
topic_facet arctic law
law of the sea
maritime delimitation
beaufort sea
convention concerning the limits of their respective possessions on the northwest coast of america and the navigation of the pacific ocean 1825
special circumstances in international law
equidistance principle
indigenous people
estoppel principle
Law of nations
KZ2-6785
Comparative law. International uniform law
K520-5582
description Introduction. Maritime boundary disputes and exercising sovereignty in the Arctic are of great current interest in the International Law since there is no uniform understanding of the limits of applicability of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 to the Arctic Ocean taking into account the international customary law and historic rights of the coastal states. One of such disputes is the US-Canada Beaufort Sea maritime boundary dispute which is of vast importance due to the hydrocarbon exploration of these states in the outlined area as well as due to the conclusion and entry into force of the Treaty between the Kingdom of Norway and the Russian Federation concerning Maritime Delimitation and Cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean 2010.Materials and methods. The theoretical background of this research consists of works of distinguished Russian and foreign scholars and specialists in International Law. The analytical framework includes the treaties between Arctic coastal states concerning maritime delimitation (the Convention Concerning the Limits of Their Respective Possessions on the Northwest Coast of America and the Navigation of the Pacific Ocean 1825, Treaty concerning the Cession of the Russian Possessions in North America by his Majesty the Emperor of all the Russia to the United States of America 1867, Agreement between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the maritime boundary 1990), national legislation of the US and Canada, diplomatic notes. The research is based on methods such as formal logic, including analysis, synthesis, analogy and modeling historical research, as well as systematic, historical and comparative methods.Research results. Based on the results of the study, the author notes that there are considerable differences in the US and Canada’s legal stances concerning the disputed area of the Beaufort Sea, including in particular the opposing views of these states on the applicability of the Convention 1825 to their ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author I. V. Bunik
author_facet I. V. Bunik
author_sort I. V. Bunik
title US–Canada Beaufort Sea Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Perspective of International Law
title_short US–Canada Beaufort Sea Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Perspective of International Law
title_full US–Canada Beaufort Sea Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Perspective of International Law
title_fullStr US–Canada Beaufort Sea Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Perspective of International Law
title_full_unstemmed US–Canada Beaufort Sea Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Perspective of International Law
title_sort us–canada beaufort sea maritime boundary dispute in the perspective of international law
publisher Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO)
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2018-2-126-137
https://doaj.org/article/3735e13260644f7c8b9b01a181c17ee0
genre Arctic Ocean
Barents Sea
Beaufort Sea
genre_facet Arctic Ocean
Barents Sea
Beaufort Sea
op_source Московский журнал международного права, Vol 0, Iss 2, Pp 126-137 (2018)
op_relation https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/262
https://doaj.org/toc/0869-0049
https://doaj.org/toc/2619-0893
0869-0049
2619-0893
doi:10.24833/0869-0049-2018-2-126-137
https://doaj.org/article/3735e13260644f7c8b9b01a181c17ee0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2018-2-126-137
container_title Moscow Journal of International Law
container_issue 2
container_start_page 126
op_container_end_page 137
_version_ 1810429838370013184