Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study
Objectives: This study compared the physical, mental, and social health levels among Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Methods: We sampled from 34 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries and divided physical, mental, and social health i...
Published in: | SAGE Open Medicine |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117753847 https://doaj.org/article/36348b7a08fc42f6af3cf8313c90b731 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:36348b7a08fc42f6af3cf8313c90b731 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:36348b7a08fc42f6af3cf8313c90b731 2023-05-15T16:50:30+02:00 Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study Myung-Bae Park Eun Woo Nam Chun-Bae Kim Hae Jong Lee Kwang-Soo Lee Sang-Baek Koh 2018-02-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117753847 https://doaj.org/article/36348b7a08fc42f6af3cf8313c90b731 EN eng SAGE Publishing https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117753847 https://doaj.org/toc/2050-3121 2050-3121 doi:10.1177/2050312117753847 https://doaj.org/article/36348b7a08fc42f6af3cf8313c90b731 SAGE Open Medicine, Vol 6 (2018) Medicine (General) R5-920 article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117753847 2022-12-31T12:10:50Z Objectives: This study compared the physical, mental, and social health levels among Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Methods: We sampled from 34 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries and divided physical, mental, and social health into three domains based on World Health Organization health definitions. Results: A multivariate hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to group countries that were similar in terms of health. Regarding physical health, Japan, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, and ten more countries reported favorable health conditions. For mental health, Australia, Canada and eight more countries revealed favorable conditions. Finally, in terms of social health, Austria, Finland, Iceland, and seven more countries reported favorable conditions. Sweden and Switzerland reported the best health conditions aggregated across all three domains. Conversely, Estonia, Hungary, and Turkey reported comparatively poorer health across all three domains when compared with other Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Conclusions: We suggested that mental health policy should be further strengthened in cases of Korea and Japan. In case of the Eastern Bloc countries, health policies should be established focusing on health equity for effective improvement of indicators. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Canada SAGE Open Medicine 6 205031211775384 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
Medicine (General) R5-920 |
spellingShingle |
Medicine (General) R5-920 Myung-Bae Park Eun Woo Nam Chun-Bae Kim Hae Jong Lee Kwang-Soo Lee Sang-Baek Koh Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study |
topic_facet |
Medicine (General) R5-920 |
description |
Objectives: This study compared the physical, mental, and social health levels among Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Methods: We sampled from 34 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries and divided physical, mental, and social health into three domains based on World Health Organization health definitions. Results: A multivariate hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to group countries that were similar in terms of health. Regarding physical health, Japan, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, and ten more countries reported favorable health conditions. For mental health, Australia, Canada and eight more countries revealed favorable conditions. Finally, in terms of social health, Austria, Finland, Iceland, and seven more countries reported favorable conditions. Sweden and Switzerland reported the best health conditions aggregated across all three domains. Conversely, Estonia, Hungary, and Turkey reported comparatively poorer health across all three domains when compared with other Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Conclusions: We suggested that mental health policy should be further strengthened in cases of Korea and Japan. In case of the Eastern Bloc countries, health policies should be established focusing on health equity for effective improvement of indicators. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Myung-Bae Park Eun Woo Nam Chun-Bae Kim Hae Jong Lee Kwang-Soo Lee Sang-Baek Koh |
author_facet |
Myung-Bae Park Eun Woo Nam Chun-Bae Kim Hae Jong Lee Kwang-Soo Lee Sang-Baek Koh |
author_sort |
Myung-Bae Park |
title |
Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study |
title_short |
Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study |
title_full |
Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study |
title_fullStr |
Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study |
title_sort |
favorable and unfavorable health conditions within oecd countries: an exploratory study |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117753847 https://doaj.org/article/36348b7a08fc42f6af3cf8313c90b731 |
geographic |
Canada |
geographic_facet |
Canada |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_source |
SAGE Open Medicine, Vol 6 (2018) |
op_relation |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117753847 https://doaj.org/toc/2050-3121 2050-3121 doi:10.1177/2050312117753847 https://doaj.org/article/36348b7a08fc42f6af3cf8313c90b731 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117753847 |
container_title |
SAGE Open Medicine |
container_volume |
6 |
container_start_page |
205031211775384 |
_version_ |
1766040634756431872 |