Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study

Objectives: This study compared the physical, mental, and social health levels among Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Methods: We sampled from 34 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries and divided physical, mental, and social health i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:SAGE Open Medicine
Main Authors: Myung-Bae Park, Eun Woo Nam, Chun-Bae Kim, Hae Jong Lee, Kwang-Soo Lee, Sang-Baek Koh
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117753847
https://doaj.org/article/36348b7a08fc42f6af3cf8313c90b731
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:36348b7a08fc42f6af3cf8313c90b731
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:36348b7a08fc42f6af3cf8313c90b731 2023-05-15T16:50:30+02:00 Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study Myung-Bae Park Eun Woo Nam Chun-Bae Kim Hae Jong Lee Kwang-Soo Lee Sang-Baek Koh 2018-02-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117753847 https://doaj.org/article/36348b7a08fc42f6af3cf8313c90b731 EN eng SAGE Publishing https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117753847 https://doaj.org/toc/2050-3121 2050-3121 doi:10.1177/2050312117753847 https://doaj.org/article/36348b7a08fc42f6af3cf8313c90b731 SAGE Open Medicine, Vol 6 (2018) Medicine (General) R5-920 article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117753847 2022-12-31T12:10:50Z Objectives: This study compared the physical, mental, and social health levels among Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Methods: We sampled from 34 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries and divided physical, mental, and social health into three domains based on World Health Organization health definitions. Results: A multivariate hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to group countries that were similar in terms of health. Regarding physical health, Japan, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, and ten more countries reported favorable health conditions. For mental health, Australia, Canada and eight more countries revealed favorable conditions. Finally, in terms of social health, Austria, Finland, Iceland, and seven more countries reported favorable conditions. Sweden and Switzerland reported the best health conditions aggregated across all three domains. Conversely, Estonia, Hungary, and Turkey reported comparatively poorer health across all three domains when compared with other Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Conclusions: We suggested that mental health policy should be further strengthened in cases of Korea and Japan. In case of the Eastern Bloc countries, health policies should be established focusing on health equity for effective improvement of indicators. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Canada SAGE Open Medicine 6 205031211775384
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Medicine (General)
R5-920
Myung-Bae Park
Eun Woo Nam
Chun-Bae Kim
Hae Jong Lee
Kwang-Soo Lee
Sang-Baek Koh
Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study
topic_facet Medicine (General)
R5-920
description Objectives: This study compared the physical, mental, and social health levels among Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Methods: We sampled from 34 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries and divided physical, mental, and social health into three domains based on World Health Organization health definitions. Results: A multivariate hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to group countries that were similar in terms of health. Regarding physical health, Japan, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, and ten more countries reported favorable health conditions. For mental health, Australia, Canada and eight more countries revealed favorable conditions. Finally, in terms of social health, Austria, Finland, Iceland, and seven more countries reported favorable conditions. Sweden and Switzerland reported the best health conditions aggregated across all three domains. Conversely, Estonia, Hungary, and Turkey reported comparatively poorer health across all three domains when compared with other Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Conclusions: We suggested that mental health policy should be further strengthened in cases of Korea and Japan. In case of the Eastern Bloc countries, health policies should be established focusing on health equity for effective improvement of indicators.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Myung-Bae Park
Eun Woo Nam
Chun-Bae Kim
Hae Jong Lee
Kwang-Soo Lee
Sang-Baek Koh
author_facet Myung-Bae Park
Eun Woo Nam
Chun-Bae Kim
Hae Jong Lee
Kwang-Soo Lee
Sang-Baek Koh
author_sort Myung-Bae Park
title Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study
title_short Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study
title_full Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study
title_fullStr Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study
title_full_unstemmed Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study
title_sort favorable and unfavorable health conditions within oecd countries: an exploratory study
publisher SAGE Publishing
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117753847
https://doaj.org/article/36348b7a08fc42f6af3cf8313c90b731
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source SAGE Open Medicine, Vol 6 (2018)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117753847
https://doaj.org/toc/2050-3121
2050-3121
doi:10.1177/2050312117753847
https://doaj.org/article/36348b7a08fc42f6af3cf8313c90b731
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117753847
container_title SAGE Open Medicine
container_volume 6
container_start_page 205031211775384
_version_ 1766040634756431872