Edge Detectors as Structural Imaging Tools Using Aeromagnetic Data: A Case Study of Sohag Area, Egypt

The present study was designed to give a clear and comprehensive understanding of the structural situation in the Sohag region and surrounding area by applying several edge detectors to aeromagnetic data. In this research, the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) values were removed from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geosciences
Main Authors: Ismael M. Ibraheem, Menna Haggag, Bülent Tezkan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9050211
https://doaj.org/article/349aff7d9b6b479ebb686f06c6d4756e
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:349aff7d9b6b479ebb686f06c6d4756e
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:349aff7d9b6b479ebb686f06c6d4756e 2023-05-15T17:39:16+02:00 Edge Detectors as Structural Imaging Tools Using Aeromagnetic Data: A Case Study of Sohag Area, Egypt Ismael M. Ibraheem Menna Haggag Bülent Tezkan 2019-05-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9050211 https://doaj.org/article/349aff7d9b6b479ebb686f06c6d4756e EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/9/5/211 https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3263 2076-3263 doi:10.3390/geosciences9050211 https://doaj.org/article/349aff7d9b6b479ebb686f06c6d4756e Geosciences, Vol 9, Iss 5, p 211 (2019) magnetic data edge detectors Euler deconvolution Sohag Egypt Geology QE1-996.5 article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9050211 2022-12-31T09:08:14Z The present study was designed to give a clear and comprehensive understanding of the structural situation in the Sohag region and surrounding area by applying several edge detectors to aeromagnetic data. In this research, the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) values were removed from the aeromagnetic data and the data obtained were then reduced to the north magnetic pole (RTP). A combination of different edge detectors was applied to determine the boundaries of the magnetic sources. A good correlation was noticed between these techniques, indicating that their integration can contribute to delineating the structural framework of the area. Consequently, a detailed structural map based on the results was constructed. Generally, E-W, N45-60E, and N15-30W directions represent the main tectonic trends in the survey area. The structural map shows the existence of two main basins constituting the most probable places for hydrocarbon accumulation. The results of this study provide structural information that can constitute an invaluable contribution to the gas and oil exploration process in this promising area. They show also that the decision in choosing the location of the drilled boreholes (Balyana-1 and Gerga) was incorrect, as they were drilled in localities within an area of a thin sedimentary cover. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Magnetic Pole Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Geosciences 9 5 211
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic magnetic data
edge detectors
Euler deconvolution
Sohag
Egypt
Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle magnetic data
edge detectors
Euler deconvolution
Sohag
Egypt
Geology
QE1-996.5
Ismael M. Ibraheem
Menna Haggag
Bülent Tezkan
Edge Detectors as Structural Imaging Tools Using Aeromagnetic Data: A Case Study of Sohag Area, Egypt
topic_facet magnetic data
edge detectors
Euler deconvolution
Sohag
Egypt
Geology
QE1-996.5
description The present study was designed to give a clear and comprehensive understanding of the structural situation in the Sohag region and surrounding area by applying several edge detectors to aeromagnetic data. In this research, the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) values were removed from the aeromagnetic data and the data obtained were then reduced to the north magnetic pole (RTP). A combination of different edge detectors was applied to determine the boundaries of the magnetic sources. A good correlation was noticed between these techniques, indicating that their integration can contribute to delineating the structural framework of the area. Consequently, a detailed structural map based on the results was constructed. Generally, E-W, N45-60E, and N15-30W directions represent the main tectonic trends in the survey area. The structural map shows the existence of two main basins constituting the most probable places for hydrocarbon accumulation. The results of this study provide structural information that can constitute an invaluable contribution to the gas and oil exploration process in this promising area. They show also that the decision in choosing the location of the drilled boreholes (Balyana-1 and Gerga) was incorrect, as they were drilled in localities within an area of a thin sedimentary cover.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ismael M. Ibraheem
Menna Haggag
Bülent Tezkan
author_facet Ismael M. Ibraheem
Menna Haggag
Bülent Tezkan
author_sort Ismael M. Ibraheem
title Edge Detectors as Structural Imaging Tools Using Aeromagnetic Data: A Case Study of Sohag Area, Egypt
title_short Edge Detectors as Structural Imaging Tools Using Aeromagnetic Data: A Case Study of Sohag Area, Egypt
title_full Edge Detectors as Structural Imaging Tools Using Aeromagnetic Data: A Case Study of Sohag Area, Egypt
title_fullStr Edge Detectors as Structural Imaging Tools Using Aeromagnetic Data: A Case Study of Sohag Area, Egypt
title_full_unstemmed Edge Detectors as Structural Imaging Tools Using Aeromagnetic Data: A Case Study of Sohag Area, Egypt
title_sort edge detectors as structural imaging tools using aeromagnetic data: a case study of sohag area, egypt
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9050211
https://doaj.org/article/349aff7d9b6b479ebb686f06c6d4756e
genre North Magnetic Pole
genre_facet North Magnetic Pole
op_source Geosciences, Vol 9, Iss 5, p 211 (2019)
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/9/5/211
https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3263
2076-3263
doi:10.3390/geosciences9050211
https://doaj.org/article/349aff7d9b6b479ebb686f06c6d4756e
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9050211
container_title Geosciences
container_volume 9
container_issue 5
container_start_page 211
_version_ 1766140034263547904