Decision Support for Participatory Forest Planning Using AHP and TOPSIS

Long-term forest management planning often involves several stakeholders with conflicting objectives, creating a complex decision process. Multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) presents a promising framework for finding solutions in terms of suitable trade-offs among the objectives. However, ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forests
Main Authors: Hilma Nilsson, Eva-Maria Nordström, Karin Öhman
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/f7050100
https://doaj.org/article/33c64e86395840d4b3d1bda60545df2c
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:33c64e86395840d4b3d1bda60545df2c
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:33c64e86395840d4b3d1bda60545df2c 2023-05-15T17:44:51+02:00 Decision Support for Participatory Forest Planning Using AHP and TOPSIS Hilma Nilsson Eva-Maria Nordström Karin Öhman 2016-05-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/f7050100 https://doaj.org/article/33c64e86395840d4b3d1bda60545df2c EN eng MDPI AG http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/7/5/100 https://doaj.org/toc/1999-4907 1999-4907 doi:10.3390/f7050100 https://doaj.org/article/33c64e86395840d4b3d1bda60545df2c Forests, Vol 7, Iss 5, p 100 (2016) Analytic Hierarchy Process forest decision support system forest management the Heureka system multiple criteria decision analysis multiple objectives Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution Plant ecology QK900-989 article 2016 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/f7050100 2022-12-31T14:54:44Z Long-term forest management planning often involves several stakeholders with conflicting objectives, creating a complex decision process. Multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) presents a promising framework for finding solutions in terms of suitable trade-offs among the objectives. However, many of the MCDA methods that have been implemented in forest management planning can only be used to compare and evaluate a limited number of management plans, which increases the risk that the most suitable plan is not included in the decision process. The aim of this study is to test whether the combination of two MCDA methods can facilitate the evaluation of a large number of strategic forest management plans in a situation with multiple objectives and several stakeholders. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to set weights for objectives based on stakeholder preferences and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was used to produce an overall ranking of alternatives. This approach was applied to a case study of the Vilhelmina municipality, northern Sweden. The results show that the combination of AHP and TOPSIS is easy to implement in participatory forest planning and takes advantage of the capacity of forest decision support systems to create a wide array of management plans. This increases the possibility that the most suitable plan for all stakeholders will be identified. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Sweden Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Forests 7 12 100
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Analytic Hierarchy Process
forest decision support system
forest management
the Heureka system
multiple criteria decision analysis
multiple objectives
Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution
Plant ecology
QK900-989
spellingShingle Analytic Hierarchy Process
forest decision support system
forest management
the Heureka system
multiple criteria decision analysis
multiple objectives
Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution
Plant ecology
QK900-989
Hilma Nilsson
Eva-Maria Nordström
Karin Öhman
Decision Support for Participatory Forest Planning Using AHP and TOPSIS
topic_facet Analytic Hierarchy Process
forest decision support system
forest management
the Heureka system
multiple criteria decision analysis
multiple objectives
Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution
Plant ecology
QK900-989
description Long-term forest management planning often involves several stakeholders with conflicting objectives, creating a complex decision process. Multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) presents a promising framework for finding solutions in terms of suitable trade-offs among the objectives. However, many of the MCDA methods that have been implemented in forest management planning can only be used to compare and evaluate a limited number of management plans, which increases the risk that the most suitable plan is not included in the decision process. The aim of this study is to test whether the combination of two MCDA methods can facilitate the evaluation of a large number of strategic forest management plans in a situation with multiple objectives and several stakeholders. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to set weights for objectives based on stakeholder preferences and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was used to produce an overall ranking of alternatives. This approach was applied to a case study of the Vilhelmina municipality, northern Sweden. The results show that the combination of AHP and TOPSIS is easy to implement in participatory forest planning and takes advantage of the capacity of forest decision support systems to create a wide array of management plans. This increases the possibility that the most suitable plan for all stakeholders will be identified.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hilma Nilsson
Eva-Maria Nordström
Karin Öhman
author_facet Hilma Nilsson
Eva-Maria Nordström
Karin Öhman
author_sort Hilma Nilsson
title Decision Support for Participatory Forest Planning Using AHP and TOPSIS
title_short Decision Support for Participatory Forest Planning Using AHP and TOPSIS
title_full Decision Support for Participatory Forest Planning Using AHP and TOPSIS
title_fullStr Decision Support for Participatory Forest Planning Using AHP and TOPSIS
title_full_unstemmed Decision Support for Participatory Forest Planning Using AHP and TOPSIS
title_sort decision support for participatory forest planning using ahp and topsis
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.3390/f7050100
https://doaj.org/article/33c64e86395840d4b3d1bda60545df2c
genre Northern Sweden
genre_facet Northern Sweden
op_source Forests, Vol 7, Iss 5, p 100 (2016)
op_relation http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/7/5/100
https://doaj.org/toc/1999-4907
1999-4907
doi:10.3390/f7050100
https://doaj.org/article/33c64e86395840d4b3d1bda60545df2c
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/f7050100
container_title Forests
container_volume 7
container_issue 12
container_start_page 100
_version_ 1766147136806715392