Norwegian State Practice and the Treaty Relating to Spitsbergen (Current International Law Issues)
The author reviews the key international legal actions undertaken by Norway since 1977 in avoidance of the Treaty of 9 February 1920 relating to Spitsbergen (hereinafter - “Spitsbergen Treaty”), as well as their significance in terms of spatial extension of the sovereign rights of Norway in the Arct...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English Russian |
Published: |
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO)
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2016-3-95-103 https://doaj.org/article/31a9989b005749bdb12e9318a47c395b |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:31a9989b005749bdb12e9318a47c395b |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:31a9989b005749bdb12e9318a47c395b 2024-10-13T14:05:33+00:00 Norwegian State Practice and the Treaty Relating to Spitsbergen (Current International Law Issues) Vera M. Savva 2016-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2016-3-95-103 https://doaj.org/article/31a9989b005749bdb12e9318a47c395b EN RU eng rus Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO) https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/158 https://doaj.org/toc/0869-0049 https://doaj.org/toc/2619-0893 https://doaj.org/article/31a9989b005749bdb12e9318a47c395b Московский журнал международного права, Vol 0, Iss 3, Pp 95-103 (2016) шпицберген договор о шпицбергене 1920 года 200-мильная рыбоохранная зона шельф шпицбергена конвенция оон по морскому праву spitsbergen treaty of 9 february 1920 relating to spitsbergen 200-mile fishery protection zone spitsbergen shelf un convention on the law of the sea Law of nations KZ2-6785 Comparative law. International uniform law K520-5582 article 2016 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2016-3-95-103 2024-10-02T16:07:14Z The author reviews the key international legal actions undertaken by Norway since 1977 in avoidance of the Treaty of 9 February 1920 relating to Spitsbergen (hereinafter - “Spitsbergen Treaty”), as well as their significance in terms of spatial extension of the sovereign rights of Norway in the Arctic. It is highlighted that Norway’s policy is based on restrictive interpretation of the Spitsbergen Treaty and replacement of its specifically created status of Spitsbergen by UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. In this connection the author analyses foreign doctrine, legal precedents, which all deny unequivocal application of restrictive approach to interpretation of a treaty, in disregard of its object and purpose. The article considers an “alternative” legal argument of Norway which asserts that Norway’s sovereignty over Spitsbergen has arisen and is currently effective by virtue of the customary law; the above argument is also set aside with reference to legal and factual counterarguments. The author concludes that applicable sources of international law challenge legality of actions that Norway is undertaking, as a result of which Norway’s legal position requires substantive improvement and affirmation. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Spitsbergen Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Norway |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English Russian |
topic |
шпицберген договор о шпицбергене 1920 года 200-мильная рыбоохранная зона шельф шпицбергена конвенция оон по морскому праву spitsbergen treaty of 9 february 1920 relating to spitsbergen 200-mile fishery protection zone spitsbergen shelf un convention on the law of the sea Law of nations KZ2-6785 Comparative law. International uniform law K520-5582 |
spellingShingle |
шпицберген договор о шпицбергене 1920 года 200-мильная рыбоохранная зона шельф шпицбергена конвенция оон по морскому праву spitsbergen treaty of 9 february 1920 relating to spitsbergen 200-mile fishery protection zone spitsbergen shelf un convention on the law of the sea Law of nations KZ2-6785 Comparative law. International uniform law K520-5582 Vera M. Savva Norwegian State Practice and the Treaty Relating to Spitsbergen (Current International Law Issues) |
topic_facet |
шпицберген договор о шпицбергене 1920 года 200-мильная рыбоохранная зона шельф шпицбергена конвенция оон по морскому праву spitsbergen treaty of 9 february 1920 relating to spitsbergen 200-mile fishery protection zone spitsbergen shelf un convention on the law of the sea Law of nations KZ2-6785 Comparative law. International uniform law K520-5582 |
description |
The author reviews the key international legal actions undertaken by Norway since 1977 in avoidance of the Treaty of 9 February 1920 relating to Spitsbergen (hereinafter - “Spitsbergen Treaty”), as well as their significance in terms of spatial extension of the sovereign rights of Norway in the Arctic. It is highlighted that Norway’s policy is based on restrictive interpretation of the Spitsbergen Treaty and replacement of its specifically created status of Spitsbergen by UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. In this connection the author analyses foreign doctrine, legal precedents, which all deny unequivocal application of restrictive approach to interpretation of a treaty, in disregard of its object and purpose. The article considers an “alternative” legal argument of Norway which asserts that Norway’s sovereignty over Spitsbergen has arisen and is currently effective by virtue of the customary law; the above argument is also set aside with reference to legal and factual counterarguments. The author concludes that applicable sources of international law challenge legality of actions that Norway is undertaking, as a result of which Norway’s legal position requires substantive improvement and affirmation. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Vera M. Savva |
author_facet |
Vera M. Savva |
author_sort |
Vera M. Savva |
title |
Norwegian State Practice and the Treaty Relating to Spitsbergen (Current International Law Issues) |
title_short |
Norwegian State Practice and the Treaty Relating to Spitsbergen (Current International Law Issues) |
title_full |
Norwegian State Practice and the Treaty Relating to Spitsbergen (Current International Law Issues) |
title_fullStr |
Norwegian State Practice and the Treaty Relating to Spitsbergen (Current International Law Issues) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Norwegian State Practice and the Treaty Relating to Spitsbergen (Current International Law Issues) |
title_sort |
norwegian state practice and the treaty relating to spitsbergen (current international law issues) |
publisher |
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO) |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2016-3-95-103 https://doaj.org/article/31a9989b005749bdb12e9318a47c395b |
geographic |
Arctic Norway |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Norway |
genre |
Arctic Spitsbergen |
genre_facet |
Arctic Spitsbergen |
op_source |
Московский журнал международного права, Vol 0, Iss 3, Pp 95-103 (2016) |
op_relation |
https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/158 https://doaj.org/toc/0869-0049 https://doaj.org/toc/2619-0893 https://doaj.org/article/31a9989b005749bdb12e9318a47c395b |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2016-3-95-103 |
_version_ |
1812811641962627072 |