A Consistent Combination of Brightness Temperatures from SMOS and SMAP over Polar Oceans for Sea Ice Applications

Passive microwave measurements at L-band from ESA’s Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission can be used to retrieve sea ice thickness of up to 0.5–1.0 m. Since 2015, NASA’s Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission provides brightness temperatures (TB) at the same frequency. Here, we explo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Amelie U. Schmitt, Lars Kaleschke
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040553
https://doaj.org/article/3114a811a85c4635af676edd597e99e5
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3114a811a85c4635af676edd597e99e5
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3114a811a85c4635af676edd597e99e5 2023-05-15T18:16:19+02:00 A Consistent Combination of Brightness Temperatures from SMOS and SMAP over Polar Oceans for Sea Ice Applications Amelie U. Schmitt Lars Kaleschke 2018-04-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040553 https://doaj.org/article/3114a811a85c4635af676edd597e99e5 EN eng MDPI AG http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/4/553 https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 2072-4292 doi:10.3390/rs10040553 https://doaj.org/article/3114a811a85c4635af676edd597e99e5 Remote Sensing, Vol 10, Iss 4, p 553 (2018) SMAP SMOS L-band brightness temperature sea ice thickness Science Q article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040553 2022-12-31T11:22:47Z Passive microwave measurements at L-band from ESA’s Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission can be used to retrieve sea ice thickness of up to 0.5–1.0 m. Since 2015, NASA’s Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission provides brightness temperatures (TB) at the same frequency. Here, we explore the possibility of combining SMOS and SMAP TBs for sea ice thickness retrieval. First, we compare daily TBs over polar ocean and sea ice regions. For this purpose, the multi-angular SMOS measurements have to be fitted to the SMAP incidence angle of 40 ∘ . Using a synthetical dataset for testing, we evaluate the performance of different fitting methods. We find that a two-step regression fitting method performs best, yielding a high accuracy even for a small number of measurements of only 15. Generally, SMOS and SMAP TBs agree very well with correlations exceeding 0.99 over sea ice but show an intensity bias of about 2.7 K over both ocean and sea ice regions. This bias can be adjusted using a linear fit resulting in a very good agreement of the retrieved sea ice thicknesses. The main advantages of a combined product are the increased number of daily overpasses leading to an improved data coverage also towards lower latitudes, as well as a continuation of retrieved timeseries if one of the sensors stops delivering data. Article in Journal/Newspaper Sea ice Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Remote Sensing 10 4 553
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic SMAP
SMOS
L-band
brightness temperature
sea ice thickness
Science
Q
spellingShingle SMAP
SMOS
L-band
brightness temperature
sea ice thickness
Science
Q
Amelie U. Schmitt
Lars Kaleschke
A Consistent Combination of Brightness Temperatures from SMOS and SMAP over Polar Oceans for Sea Ice Applications
topic_facet SMAP
SMOS
L-band
brightness temperature
sea ice thickness
Science
Q
description Passive microwave measurements at L-band from ESA’s Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission can be used to retrieve sea ice thickness of up to 0.5–1.0 m. Since 2015, NASA’s Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission provides brightness temperatures (TB) at the same frequency. Here, we explore the possibility of combining SMOS and SMAP TBs for sea ice thickness retrieval. First, we compare daily TBs over polar ocean and sea ice regions. For this purpose, the multi-angular SMOS measurements have to be fitted to the SMAP incidence angle of 40 ∘ . Using a synthetical dataset for testing, we evaluate the performance of different fitting methods. We find that a two-step regression fitting method performs best, yielding a high accuracy even for a small number of measurements of only 15. Generally, SMOS and SMAP TBs agree very well with correlations exceeding 0.99 over sea ice but show an intensity bias of about 2.7 K over both ocean and sea ice regions. This bias can be adjusted using a linear fit resulting in a very good agreement of the retrieved sea ice thicknesses. The main advantages of a combined product are the increased number of daily overpasses leading to an improved data coverage also towards lower latitudes, as well as a continuation of retrieved timeseries if one of the sensors stops delivering data.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Amelie U. Schmitt
Lars Kaleschke
author_facet Amelie U. Schmitt
Lars Kaleschke
author_sort Amelie U. Schmitt
title A Consistent Combination of Brightness Temperatures from SMOS and SMAP over Polar Oceans for Sea Ice Applications
title_short A Consistent Combination of Brightness Temperatures from SMOS and SMAP over Polar Oceans for Sea Ice Applications
title_full A Consistent Combination of Brightness Temperatures from SMOS and SMAP over Polar Oceans for Sea Ice Applications
title_fullStr A Consistent Combination of Brightness Temperatures from SMOS and SMAP over Polar Oceans for Sea Ice Applications
title_full_unstemmed A Consistent Combination of Brightness Temperatures from SMOS and SMAP over Polar Oceans for Sea Ice Applications
title_sort consistent combination of brightness temperatures from smos and smap over polar oceans for sea ice applications
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040553
https://doaj.org/article/3114a811a85c4635af676edd597e99e5
genre Sea ice
genre_facet Sea ice
op_source Remote Sensing, Vol 10, Iss 4, p 553 (2018)
op_relation http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/4/553
https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292
2072-4292
doi:10.3390/rs10040553
https://doaj.org/article/3114a811a85c4635af676edd597e99e5
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040553
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 10
container_issue 4
container_start_page 553
_version_ 1766189856341360640